NATION

PASSWORD

Jesus died for you.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
South Waxhaw
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Oct 09, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby South Waxhaw » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:52 am

Candalia wrote:
South Waxhaw wrote:To start off let's get all other religions out of the way. They all believe man is basically good. Which is not even close to reality.
Now then atheism: problem of energy coming from non energy- solved: creation. Problem of mans evil: solved: sin nature. Problem of morality: solved: from God


Energy isn't coming from nothing, it is generated by molecules and cells when they react to each other. Morals are something that every person has and will discover.

Also how is it accurate that everything revolves around the Earth and that the Earth is flat?

Is it a miracle that when you rub your hands together, the rubbing action produces warmth, is that a miracle that god created just now? Nope, it is a reaction of the cells of your body rubbing against each other, thus warming the air molecules.

(Sorry if some of the terminology isn't correct, English isn't my 1st language.)

Where do the molecules and cells come from? And also can we please keep this debate about the Bible and not beliefs the Catholic Church last held centuries ago?

User avatar
Candalia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 48
Founded: Oct 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Candalia » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:53 am

The Alma Mater wrote:
South Waxhaw wrote:Okay a lot of these deal with evil. If I am understanding you are arguing that man is not evil. How then is there war all around? Why is there rape? Murder?


Because god likes to masturbate to those. Who are we to deny him his pleasure ?


Wouln't be the first time we see controversy in religion. Intercourse for pleasure and masturbation is a sin that will automatically send you deep into hell. So about lass than 1% of men will get to heaven.

User avatar
South Waxhaw
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Oct 09, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby South Waxhaw » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:54 am

Erinkita wrote:
South Waxhaw wrote:So you're saying you know that God implied that?

If we take Genesis to be an accurate account of events, then it's obvious from God's words that he was misleading them.
Do you honestly mean to tell me that God said "Eat the fruit and you will die" and intended Adam and Eve to get any impression other than that eating the fruit would cause them to die?

I daresay it's a tad bit of a stretch to say we know implications from a translation of a language that's been dead for almost 2 mellenia

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:55 am

South Waxhaw wrote:Okay a lot of these deal with evil. If I am understanding you are arguing that man is not evil. How then is there war all around? Why is there rape? Murder?

Because human beings are flawed animals, not children of any god.
It makes much more sense actually.

I prefer to think of mankind as the Enlightened Animals who are forever moving forward, the eternal struggle to improve ourselves.
Instead of sinful creatures who have fallen from grace.
Last edited by Genivaria on Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:55 am

Candalia wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:
Because god likes to masturbate to those. Who are we to deny him his pleasure ?


Wouln't be the first time we see controversy in religion. Intercourse for pleasure and masturbation is a sin that will automatically send you deep into hell. So about lass less than 1% of men people will get to heaven.

Fixed
Lass wrote:A girl or young woman.

Less wrote:A smaller amount of; not as much.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:55 am

Candalia wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:
Because god likes to masturbate to those. Who are we to deny him his pleasure ?


Wouln't be the first time we see controversy in religion. Intercourse for pleasure and masturbation is a sin that will automatically send you deep into hell. So about lass than 1% of men will get to heaven.


Well, not necessarily. According to the Egyptians, the world was created by the god Atum-Ra masturbating. The Greeks and Romans certainly had a lot of stories where life occured when gods "spilled their seed". Etc. Etc.

So for some, masturbation is good ;)
Last edited by The Alma Mater on Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:56 am, edited 2 times in total.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Erinkita
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14478
Founded: Sep 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Erinkita » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:56 am

South Waxhaw wrote:
Erinkita wrote:If we take Genesis to be an accurate account of events, then it's obvious from God's words that he was misleading them.
Do you honestly mean to tell me that God said "Eat the fruit and you will die" and intended Adam and Eve to get any impression other than that eating the fruit would cause them to die?

I daresay it's a tad bit of a stretch to say we know implications from a translation of a language that's been dead for almost 2 mellenia

Very true, but that cuts both ways. You can't invoke mistranslation solely on the parts you find inconvenient. If you're going to bring unreliability of language into question, everything in the entire book becomes untrustworthy.
Loan me a dragon, I wanna see space.
Justice for Jane Doe

User avatar
Candalia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 48
Founded: Oct 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Candalia » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:57 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Candalia wrote:
Wouln't be the first time we see controversy in religion. Intercourse for pleasure and masturbation is a sin that will automatically send you deep into hell. So about lass less than 1% of men people will get to heaven.

Fixed
Lass wrote:A girl or young woman.

Less wrote:A smaller amount of; not as much.


I know the differences, just an innocent typo.

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:58 am

South Waxhaw wrote:Where do the molecules and cells come from?


Molecules are formed of elementary "particles." Elementary quanta are just minimal perturbations in the quantum fields of nature. Quantum fields don't have to come from anywhere. No known mechanism can make them disappear. They could easily have existed since the beginning of time, if time had a beginning.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:58 am

Candalia wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Fixed



I know the differences, just an innocent typo.

Wasn't sure... You did say English wasn't your first language... Was actually trying to be helpful, not trying to be a dick...
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Candalia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 48
Founded: Oct 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Candalia » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:00 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Candalia wrote:
I know the differences, just an innocent typo.

Wasn't sure... You did say English wasn't your first language... Was actually trying to be helpful, not trying to be a dick...


Thanks to wonderful chances I can speak it almost as well as my native language, except for maybe the most scientific sentences.

It's okay, don't worry about it.
Last edited by Candalia on Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:19 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111671
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:03 am

South Waxhaw wrote:
Erinkita wrote:If we take Genesis to be an accurate account of events, then it's obvious from God's words that he was misleading them.
Do you honestly mean to tell me that God said "Eat the fruit and you will die" and intended Adam and Eve to get any impression other than that eating the fruit would cause them to die?

I daresay it's a tad bit of a stretch to say we know implications from a translation of a language that's been dead for almost 2 mellenia

Hebrew isn't a dead language. People have been studying the Old Testament in that language continuously for millennia.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
South Waxhaw
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Oct 09, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby South Waxhaw » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:09 am

Farnhamia wrote:
South Waxhaw wrote:I daresay it's a tad bit of a stretch to say we know implications from a translation of a language that's been dead for almost 2 mellenia

Hebrew isn't a dead language. People have been studying the Old Testament in that language continuously for millennia.

A dead language is one that is no longer in common use and ancient Hebrew falls in that category
And I know it's been studied for mellinia. My father can read and write it

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:11 am

Is it just me or is there something romantic and inspiring about a tale of struggle and success.
We were once so small, little better then any other animal. And now look at us.

This quote by The Warrior Hearted says it well.


The Warrior Hearted wrote:in all honesty, its because we are built 90% wrong for sruvival.

We dont have claws, we dont large teeth, we are weak, we are slow, we waste pointless energy on brains, and we are free game for anything bigger then us that is hungry.



So we changed the rules. No claws? Get a rock, smash it on another rock and suddenly you have a "claw". Too slow to hunt well? Put a "claw" on the end of a long stick and throw it. No natural way to stay warm in the cold? Rip the skin off an animal and wear it. Not enough? Rub two sticks together till you create fire.

Getting bored and tired of hunting? Plant a small seed, come back later and eat. Not efficient enough? do it on a large scale, take care of the crops, and eat on a more reliable basis.

Stone tools not cutting it anymore? Throw some bluish green rocks in a really hot fire and poor it into a tool shape. Makeyourself copper tools. Copper too rare? Make an even hotter fire, throw a few reddish brown rocks into it and hammer it into a shape you want.




And history continues like this to modern day. We are the ultimate underdogs. We started with nothing and changed the rules of survival. We decide what lives and dies, not nature. We took the future and are never going to give it up, it is ours now.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
DaWoad
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9066
Founded: Nov 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby DaWoad » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:12 am

South Waxhaw wrote:
Candalia wrote:
Energy isn't coming from nothing, it is generated by molecules and cells when they react to each other. Morals are something that every person has and will discover.

Also how is it accurate that everything revolves around the Earth and that the Earth is flat?

Is it a miracle that when you rub your hands together, the rubbing action produces warmth, is that a miracle that god created just now? Nope, it is a reaction of the cells of your body rubbing against each other, thus warming the air molecules.

(Sorry if some of the terminology isn't correct, English isn't my 1st language.)

Where do the molecules and cells come from?

abiogenisis----->big bang----->quantum theory
just because it's easier to say "creation!" doesn't mean it's right.
And also can we please keep this debate about the Bible and not beliefs the Catholic Church last held centuries ago?

er? you brought it up?
Last edited by DaWoad on Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Official Nation States Trainer
Factbook:http://nationstates.wikia.com/wiki/User:Dawoad
Alliances:The Hegemony, The GDF, SCUTUM

Supporter of making [citation needed] the official NSG way to say "source?"

User avatar
South Waxhaw
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Oct 09, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby South Waxhaw » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:12 am

The Rich Port wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:1: Source?
2: I assume you can provide evidence that all people are basically evil then?
3: Methinks you have no clue what atheism is...
4: Yay! Christianity solves a problem that it artificially imposes! :roll:
5: :rofl: Only christians can be moral... :roll:


1.) He shouldn't (and probably won't) even bother. Outright fabrication.
2.) He most certainly can't. Statistically impossible.
3.) He doesn't. Not all atheists believe in spontaneous matter manifestation.
4.) Really convenient, IMO. They're never wrong because the problem never existed.
5.) The part that really insults me.

1) The Deadliest Moster~ J.F. Baldwin
2) You're right I can't. So name me someone who isn't
3) so how did the world come to be?
4) if man has no sin nature why are the youngest children most disobedient of all age groups?
5)I take it then you never have felt remorse over doing anything?

User avatar
South Waxhaw
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Oct 09, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby South Waxhaw » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:14 am

DaWoad wrote:
South Waxhaw wrote:Where do the molecules and cells come from?





abiogenisis----->big bang----->quantum theory
just because it's easier to say "creation!" doesn't mean it's right.
And also can we please keep this debate about the Bible and not beliefs the Catholic Church last held centuries ago?

er? you brought it up?

Abiogenesis has no evidence whatsoever
And I did not bring up that

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:17 am

South Waxhaw wrote:4) if man has no sin nature why are the youngest children most disobedient of all age groups?


Because the ideas that humans are essentially good and that humans are essentially evil are both extremely simplistic and represent a false dichotomy.

Also, I don't really see much evidence that the youngest of children are the most disobedient of all. Nonetheless:

1. Children who are sufficiently young, like less than 3 years old, tend not to be old enough to understand social norms yet, so they behave in an amoral, not an immoral, manner.

2. Being disobedient is not equivalent to being evil. Sometimes authority is wrong, and thus disobedience is the right thing to do.

See, this is what I mean about overly simplistic thinking.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
Candalia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 48
Founded: Oct 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Candalia » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:17 am

South Waxhaw wrote:
DaWoad wrote:abiogenisis----->big bang----->quantum theory
just because it's easier to say "creation!" doesn't mean it's right.

er? you brought it up?

Abiogenesis has no evidence whatsoever
And I did not bring up that


Neither does creationism.

Then again, science is actually working on proving everything in the world that is scientifically correct.

User avatar
DaWoad
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9066
Founded: Nov 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby DaWoad » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:18 am

South Waxhaw wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
1.) He shouldn't (and probably won't) even bother. Outright fabrication.
2.) He most certainly can't. Statistically impossible.
3.) He doesn't. Not all atheists believe in spontaneous matter manifestation.
4.) Really convenient, IMO. They're never wrong because the problem never existed.
5.) The part that really insults me.

1) The Deadliest Moster~ J.F. Baldwin

I very much doubt it and cite page please.
2) You're right I can't. So name me someone who isn't

who isn't evil? The vast majority of people aren''t evil. A specific example? Jack Layton.
3) so how did the world come to be?

big bang theory there are a bunch of subtheories including a cyclical universe theory and etc. Some atheists just say they don't know.
4) if man has no sin nature why are the youngest children most disobedient of all age groups?

because obedience is a learned trait.
5)I take it then you never have felt remorse over doing anything?

that doesn't follow
Last edited by DaWoad on Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Official Nation States Trainer
Factbook:http://nationstates.wikia.com/wiki/User:Dawoad
Alliances:The Hegemony, The GDF, SCUTUM

Supporter of making [citation needed] the official NSG way to say "source?"

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:19 am

South Waxhaw wrote:Abiogenesis has no evidence whatsoever


False. There is not yet enough evidence to conclusively decide which model of abiogenesis actually happened. However, we know of several that do work, and we know that it is possible.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
DaWoad
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9066
Founded: Nov 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby DaWoad » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:20 am

South Waxhaw wrote:
DaWoad wrote:abiogenisis----->big bang----->quantum theory
just because it's easier to say "creation!" doesn't mean it's right.

er? you brought it up?

Abiogenesis has no evidence whatsoever
And I did not bring up that

Abiogenesis has been performed in a lab setting.

you very much did:
Now then atheism: problem of energy coming from non energy- solved: creation. Problem of mans evil: solved: sin nature. Problem of morality: solved: from God
Official Nation States Trainer
Factbook:http://nationstates.wikia.com/wiki/User:Dawoad
Alliances:The Hegemony, The GDF, SCUTUM

Supporter of making [citation needed] the official NSG way to say "source?"

User avatar
Erinkita
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14478
Founded: Sep 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Erinkita » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:26 am

South Waxhaw wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
1.) He shouldn't (and probably won't) even bother. Outright fabrication.
2.) He most certainly can't. Statistically impossible.
3.) He doesn't. Not all atheists believe in spontaneous matter manifestation.
4.) Really convenient, IMO. They're never wrong because the problem never existed.
5.) The part that really insults me.

1) The Deadliest Moster~ J.F. Baldwin
2) You're right I can't. So name me someone who isn't
3) so how did the world come to be?
4) if man has no sin nature why are the youngest children most disobedient of all age groups?
5)I take it then you never have felt remorse over doing anything?

1) I'm gonna leave that one alone
2) I'm not. I suspect that you aren't either.
3)
The geological history of Earth is believed to have begun 4.567 billion years ago[1] when the planets of the Solar System were formed out of the solar nebula, a disk-shaped mass of dust and gas left over from the formation of the Sun. Initially molten, the outer layer of the planet Earth cooled to form a solid crust when water began accumulating in the atmosphere. The Moon formed soon afterwards, possibly as the result of a Mars-sized object with about 10% of the Earth's mass,[2] known as Theia, impacting the Earth in a glancing blow.[3] Some of this object's mass merged with the Earth and a portion was ejected into space, but enough material survived to form an orbiting moon.

Outgassing and volcanic activity produced the primordial atmosphere. Condensing water vapor, augmented by ice delivered by comets, produced the oceans.[4]

As the surface continually reshaped itself over hundreds of millions of years, continents formed and broke up. The continents migrated across the surface, occasionally combining to form a supercontinent. Roughly 750 Ma (million years ago),[5] the earliest-known supercontinent Rodinia, began to break apart. The continents later recombined to form Pannotia, 600–540 Ma,[5] then finally Pangaea, which broke apart 180 Ma.[5][6]

4) Are they? I would contest that. Also, disobedience =/= evil.
5) Why would you assume something like that? That's both insulting and random.
Loan me a dragon, I wanna see space.
Justice for Jane Doe

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111671
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:28 am

South Waxhaw wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
1.) He shouldn't (and probably won't) even bother. Outright fabrication.
2.) He most certainly can't. Statistically impossible.
3.) He doesn't. Not all atheists believe in spontaneous matter manifestation.
4.) Really convenient, IMO. They're never wrong because the problem never existed.
5.) The part that really insults me.

1) The Deadliest Moster~ J.F. Baldwin
2) You're right I can't. So name me someone who isn't
3) so how did the world come to be?
4) if man has no sin nature why are the youngest children most disobedient of all age groups?
5)I take it then you never have felt remorse over doing anything?

Just on #4, that younger children are more disobedient (if they are and for that you'll need to provide sources) has nothing to do with "sin" or "God." All children try to get away with things. The ones born first are subjected to stricter rules probably because their parents are unsure of what to do and are worried about what might happen. As the parents acquire experience, they relax the rules, having learned that kids are pretty resilient. Of course, the older siblings are outraged by this, but such is life.

And on #5, remorse does not need Yahweh and his pronouncements from the mountain top. People in and of themselves are capable of remorse without the threat of divine punishment.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
South Waxhaw
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Oct 09, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby South Waxhaw » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:30 am

DaWoad wrote:
South Waxhaw wrote:1) The Deadliest Moster~ J.F. Baldwin

I very much doubt it and cite page please.
2) You're right I can't. So name me someone who isn't

who isn't evil? The vast majority of people aren''t evil. A specific example? Jack Layton.
3) so how did the world come to be?

big bang theory there are a bunch of subtheories including a cyclical universe theory and etc. Some atheists just say they don't know.
4) if man has no sin nature why are the youngest children most disobedient of all age groups?

because obedience is a learned trait.
5)I take it then you never have felt remorse over doing anything?

that doesn't follow

page 26

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, EuroStralia, Floofybit, Greater Miami Shores 3, Necroghastia, Senscaria, Thepeopl, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads