The Rich Port wrote:The Alma Mater wrote:
To be fair, it IS possible the story was a tad bit... molested. Perhaps God offered humanity a choice:
A) living as animals in paradise, never learning, never growing, never accomplishing anything - but never knowing misery or loss either
B) Becoming mortals, able to suffer - but also able to grow. And one day, become Gods equal. Or perhaps even more.
and instead of being tempted by the serpent, humanities representatives picked B after careful consideration.
Of course, this version does kinda conflict with the whole concept of Dogma certain churches adore so much. It also significantly changes the meaning of the concept of "Sin".
But hey. It makes God a whole lot more likeable.
What is this? A LOGICAL COMPROMISE? IN A THREAD ABOUT RELIGION?! BLASPHEMY
Well, it is not really a compromise - since my version is incompatible with just about all doctrines - AND contradicts the Biblebooks we still have.
But hey. I could always proclaim myself the prophet of a new faith and write a third testament




That's how schisms happen.
