The_pantless_hero wrote:Intangelon wrote:Why is it that when some decry the cost of a Mac, they fail to include the cost of operation. I've never needed a new sound card, virus subscription, etc. I don't think that makes the costs of Mac v PC equal, but it makes them much closer than the figures some like to bandy about. Especially over time. I've not dropped a dime on my Mac in four years, and it's still doing everything I need and want it to do.
1) No one needs a new soundcard, they were always nonrequired upgrades. And didn't they stop being popular 10 years ago?
Connecting a soundcard to the system rather than running off the motherboard reduces the load on the CPU, particularly if you get a good soundcard. Audiophiles and gamers are always interested in better performance.
The_pantless_hero wrote:1a) Never mind the fact that to upgrade a Mac you have to buy overpriced Apple parts AND Apple discourages users from upgrading their Macs.
Granted.
The_pantless_hero wrote:2) I don't need a virus subscription either. There are at least 3 free antiviruses. And if you arn't an idiot, you can get away with using the free scanners for the big names (they don't charge you to scan, only for protection and removal of less than ohfuckinggodtheworldisdoomed threats, depending on the company)
And no, it doesn't make their costs anywhere closer.
You may not need a subscription but you certainly need the software and the overhead it creates on your system resources. Not to mention that additional time necessary to maintain the machine. Yes, you could make the classic user mistake of just letting the program run automatically without ever checking the logs or manually launching a deep scan, but then you put yourself at higher risk of infection and deserve whatever you get.
And no, it's not all about market share making Microsoft a bigger target. It's also about architecture making Microsoft a bigger target as well. Why hunt for snipe when a pheasant is so much easier to hit?