Advertisement

by Hairless Kitten II » Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:41 am

by Andorias » Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:49 am
RoI2 wrote:Barringtonia wrote:Execute that bastard!
Why?
It would be interesting to perform an experiment whereby this story is presented to a sampling of, say, 1, 000 people.
The only question would be: what do you think? - and a short blank space for the answer, less that 100 words,
I'd like to see the difference between those whose thoughts turn directly to revenge on the perpetrator and those who consider the plight of the victim,
If I could break it all down by gender age and etc., I'd like to see those results,
That would be interesting. I don't see the point in revenge.

by Hairless Kitten II » Fri Aug 28, 2009 4:14 am
Andorias wrote:RoI2 wrote:Barringtonia wrote:Execute that bastard!
Why?
It would be interesting to perform an experiment whereby this story is presented to a sampling of, say, 1, 000 people.
The only question would be: what do you think? - and a short blank space for the answer, less that 100 words,
I'd like to see the difference between those whose thoughts turn directly to revenge on the perpetrator and those who consider the plight of the victim,
If I could break it all down by gender age and etc., I'd like to see those results,
That would be interesting. I don't see the point in revenge.
Well he ruined her life so we're going to ruin his. The wife is a bitch too.
There should be a reset button for events like this.

by Greed and Death » Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:37 am

by Barringtonia » Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:47 am

by Ashmoria » Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:51 am
Barringtonia wrote:Wait, how did you assholes make it so I'm quoted as saying 'Execute the bastard',
That's not right, that's not right at all,

by Buffett and Colbert » Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:52 am
Hairless Kitten II wrote:I'm glad she escaped.
Now she'll write a book, there will be a movie soon and she will get extremely rich. Which is good.
It's not that rare that women have knowledge of the criminal behaviour of their husbands and even help them in this kind of crimes.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Huerdae » Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:54 am
Xiscapia wrote:It amused her for a time to wonder if the two fleets could not see each other, so she could imagine them blindly stabbing in the dark, like a game of tag, if tag was played with rocket launchers in pitch blackness.
[17:15] <Telros> OH HO HO, YOU THOUGHT HUE WAS OUT OF LUCK, DID YOU
[17:15] <Telros> KUKUKU, HE HAS REINFORCEMENTS
[17:15] <Telros> FOR TELROS IS REINFORCEMENTS MAN
Rezo wrote:If your battleship turrets have a smaller calibre than your penis is long, you're doing it wrong.

by Ashmoria » Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:57 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Hairless Kitten II wrote:I'm glad she escaped.
Now she'll write a book, there will be a movie soon and she will get extremely rich. Which is good.
It's not that rare that women have knowledge of the criminal behaviour of their husbands and even help them in this kind of crimes.
/end thread
Is there really anything more to discuss?

by Ifreann » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:11 am
You-Gi-Owe wrote:Kyronea wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8225621.stm
I am...I am just...I'm not sure I have any words for this. The emotional side of me rages for some sort of harsh punishment towards the kidnappers, but the rational side of me forces me to ask, what sort of punishment can we justify for this without treating the crime with an emotional bias?
Eighteen years, to begin with, in hard labor. The time she was gone from her family? Seems fair and rational.
Part of me wants to repeatedly waterboard this bastard and his wife, though.

by Chazaka » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:14 am
Huerdae wrote:18 years.
We don't put people in prison that long very often, even. That's effectively where she was, even if she became acclimated. And assuming rape, as well...
...as far as I'm concerned, those two destroyed her life. I would honestly try them for murder.
She missed what most people consider the prime of her life. From 11 to 29, she was a prisoner. What would your life be like, if you were missing that part of your life? Could you even get a reasonable job?

by The Ben Boys » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:17 am


by Chazaka » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:18 am
Phillip Garrido has a conviction for rape and was paroled in 1999, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

by Virtud Tierra » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:28 am

by Farnhamia » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:31 am
Virtud Tierra wrote:The local radio station DJ is pretty sure she was'nt actually physically trapped at that location, since she made no attempt to escape for 18 years. It sounds like the girl ran away, abandoned her family and decided to live with the sex offender dude and his wife in just a normal fucked up relationship and she decided to live in the guy's backyard.
Or maybe I'm just being cynical, but I find it harder to believe that she was some sort of unwilling prisoner that never had an oppurtunity to escape untill the old man accidently/intentionally brought her to his goddamn parole officer.

by Ifreann » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:33 am
Chazaka wrote:I'm confused about this part:Phillip Garrido has a conviction for rape and was paroled in 1999, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
If one is paroled doesn't that mean one was in jail for at least a time? and if she was abducted in 1991, who was watching her during the time he was in jail/on trial?

by Chazaka » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:35 am
Ifreann wrote:Chazaka wrote:I'm confused about this part:Phillip Garrido has a conviction for rape and was paroled in 1999, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
If one is paroled doesn't that mean one was in jail for at least a time? and if she was abducted in 1991, who was watching her during the time he was in jail/on trial?
Who says anyone needed to watch her? She could have been physically restrained. Or she could have been too afraid to try and escape.
Edit: Or Stockholm Syndrome.
The local radio station DJ is pretty sure she was'nt actually physically trapped at that location, since she made no attempt to escape for 18 years. It sounds like the girl ran away, abandoned her family and decided to live with the sex offender dude and his wife in just a normal fucked up relationship and she decided to live in the guy's backyard.
Or maybe I'm just being cynical, but I find it harder to believe that she was some sort of unwilling prisoner that never had an oppurtunity to escape untill the old man accidently/intentionally brought her to his goddamn parole officer.

by Yazdegerd » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:41 am
Kyronea wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8225621.stmMissing US girl found 18 years on
A US woman found after being abducted as a girl in 1991 gave birth to two children fathered by her alleged kidnapper, police say.
Jaycee Lee Dugard and the children, aged 11 and 15, were kept in a "hidden backyard within a backyard".
Alleged kidnapper Phillip Garrido, 58, and his wife Nancy Garrido, 54, are being held in custody in California.
DNA tests are being done to establish Ms Dugard's identity, but meanwhile she has been reunited with her mother.
Ms Dugard disappeared in 1991, aged 11, from outside her Lake Tahoe home, apparently taken by two people.
El Dorado County Undersheriff Fred Kollar she had lived with the couple, isolated from view at a property in Antioch near San Francisco since the kidnapping.
"The tents and outbuildings in the backyard were placed in a strategic arrangement to inhibit outside viewing and to isolate the victims from outside contact."
The three spent "most of their lives" there, he said, adding that they had never been to school or seen a doctor.
Their identities were revealed after Mr Garrido was spotted by police at the University of California Berkeley campus with the two young children.
He raised suspicions because as a registered sex offender he was not allowed to be with young children.
Phillip Garrido has a conviction for rape and was paroled in 1999, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
He was called in by his parole officer for questioning, and brought the two children and a young woman he called Allissa with him.
During questioning he revealed that Allissa was actually Ms Dugard. She also confirmed her identity to police.
At the Antioch property, there was also a vehicle hidden in the backyard which matched the vehicle originally described at the time of the abduction, Mr Kollar said.
"It's a pretty spectacular story just to find someone like that. Someone we assumed was dead," said Bill Clark, a senior prosecutor in El Dorado County.
Jimmie Lee, a local police spokesman, said Mr Garrido was also being held for investigation of rape by force, lewd and lascivious acts with a minor and sexual penetration.
Under suspicion
As news spread of Ms Dugard's apparent re-appearance, her stepfather Carl Probyn told ABC News in the US that her family was now convinced she was coming back to them.
"I had personally given up hope," he said, saying that he just wanted to find the people responsible.
Mr Probyn was watching on 10 June 1991, as the young girl was apparently taken away by two unidentified people.
The incident occurred as she was walking from her home to a school bus stop in the southern Lake Tahoe town of Meyers.
“ She sounds like she's okay. I hope she's been well treated this entire 18 years ”
Carl Probyn Stepfather
Her stepfather - who initially came under suspicion in her disappearance and is now estranged from Ms Dugard's mother - has described how a stranger drove up and grabbed Ms Dugard, bundling her into a grey car even as she tried to resist by kicking and screaming.
Mr Probyn believed a man and woman were in the vehicle. Despite several false reports of sightings in the intervening years, Ms Dugard was never seen again.
"She sounds like she's okay," he said.
"She had a conversation with my wife and she remembers things. I hope she's been well treated this entire 18 years."
"To have this happen where we get her back alive, and where she remembers things from the past, and to have people in custody is a triple win," he told the Sacramento Bee newspaper.
I am...I am just...I'm not sure I have any words for this. The emotional side of me rages for some sort of harsh punishment towards the kidnappers, but the rational side of me forces me to ask, what sort of punishment can we justify for this without treating the crime with an emotional bias?

by Barringtonia » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:42 am
Farnhamia wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:The local radio station DJ is pretty sure she was'nt actually physically trapped at that location, since she made no attempt to escape for 18 years. It sounds like the girl ran away, abandoned her family and decided to live with the sex offender dude and his wife in just a normal fucked up relationship and she decided to live in the guy's backyard.
Or maybe I'm just being cynical, but I find it harder to believe that she was some sort of unwilling prisoner that never had an oppurtunity to escape untill the old man accidently/intentionally brought her to his goddamn parole officer.
The local DJ, huh? Where's his degree in psychology from?
Stockholm Syndrome?

by Dimoniquid » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:48 am

by JewCat » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:58 am

by Hairless Kitten II » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:00 am
JewCat wrote:thats just a little messed up.
how could his wife be okay with him having sex with this kid?![]()
or worse, he threatened her too?
what a messed up situation....
however, it is nice that she was reunited with her family.

by JewCat » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:08 am
Barringtonia wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:The local radio station DJ is pretty sure she was'nt actually physically trapped at that location, since she made no attempt to escape for 18 years. It sounds like the girl ran away, abandoned her family and decided to live with the sex offender dude and his wife in just a normal fucked up relationship and she decided to live in the guy's backyard.
Or maybe I'm just being cynical, but I find it harder to believe that she was some sort of unwilling prisoner that never had an oppurtunity to escape untill the old man accidently/intentionally brought her to his goddamn parole officer.
The local DJ, huh? Where's his degree in psychology from?
Stockholm Syndrome?
It doesn't really have to be Stockholm Syndrome, which can be part but separate to why she didn't try to escape.
We've no idea of the first few days, the first few weeks, the extent to which we was kept captive. Her reward for not struggling, for not trying to escape, is a little freedom, a loosening of the ropes, an extra meal...
After a while she's basically institutionalised, that's more a reason than identifying with her captor as such.
That radio Dj is an insensitive and uneducated asshole, to cast such aspersions over her based on the end of her captivity, when she had some degree of freedom compared to the start of her captivity, and the basic rape she went through,
Horrifying, some people comment with no thought,

by Chazaka » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:15 am
Phillip Garrido wrote:"Wait until you hear the story of what took place at this house," he said. "You are going to be completely impressed. It's a disgusting thing that took place with me at the beginning. But I turned my life completely around, and to be able to understand that, you have to start there."
Turning his life around kept him busy for "the last several years,'' Garrido said, adding the big surprise will come from Dugard.
"You're going to find the most powerful story coming from the witness, the victim — you wait. If you take this a step at a time, you're going to fall over backwards and in the end, you're going to find the most powerful heartwarming story.'' he said.
Garrido had served time for kidnapping a woman in the Lake Tahoe area in 1976 and driving her to Reno, where he sexually assaulted her. He was given a 50-year federal sentence and a five-years-to-life sentence to be served concurrently. He was paroled in Nevada in 1988.

by Virtud Tierra » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:21 am
Chazaka wrote:Oh my, the guy had a business called God's Desire.. and the neighbors were suspicious, and called the sheriff before and he did investigate but didn't find anything it seems...
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_13222539?source=most_viewed
The alleged kidnapper/prev is one crazy fu**Phillip Garrido wrote:You're going to find the most powerful story coming from the witness, the victim — you wait. If you take this a step at a time, you're going to fall over backwards and in the end, you're going to find the most powerful heartwarming story.'' he said.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Alris, American Legionaries, Atomtopia, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Card Puppet 9, Duvniask, El Lazaro, Ifreann, Inlumino, Jilia, Juansonia, La Xinga, Nazbol England, New Anarchisticstan, Saiwana, Settentrionalia, The free romanians, The Jamesian Republic, The Sherpa Empire, The United Kingdom of King Charles III, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement