Advertisement

by Offenheim » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:15 pm

by Der Teutoniker » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:34 pm
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Second of all, the Galactic Republic would never have fought against what they described as 'separatists' in a giant war, if people were simply allowed to leave.
South Lorenya wrote:occasionally we get someone who has a rap sheet longer than Jormungandr
Austin Setzer wrote:We found a couple of ancient documents, turned them into the bible, and now its the symbol of christianity.
ARM Forces wrote:Strep-throat is an infection in the throat, caused by eating too much refined sugar! Rubbing more sugar directly on it is the worst thing you can possibly do.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Communism and anarchy; same unachievable end, different impractical means.

by Der Teutoniker » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:37 pm
Offenheim wrote:The only civilians killed are the contractors on the second Death Star.
South Lorenya wrote:occasionally we get someone who has a rap sheet longer than Jormungandr
Austin Setzer wrote:We found a couple of ancient documents, turned them into the bible, and now its the symbol of christianity.
ARM Forces wrote:Strep-throat is an infection in the throat, caused by eating too much refined sugar! Rubbing more sugar directly on it is the worst thing you can possibly do.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Communism and anarchy; same unachievable end, different impractical means.

by JJ Place » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:55 pm

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:57 pm
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Nightkill the Emperor » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:58 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:59 pm

Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Nightkill the Emperor » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:00 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:01 pm
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Nightkill the Emperor » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:05 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:07 pm

Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Wikkiwallana » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:07 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:08 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:08 pm


Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Wikkiwallana » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:06 pm
GreaterPacificNations wrote:New Manvir wrote:And Mussolini kept the trains running on time, or so we're told.
Also, these people blew up a FUCKING PLANET with probably billions of inhabitants.
A rebel planet. The empire says that Alderan was state sponsor of terrorism- that they were ading, abetting and harbouring violent, armed rebels. Alderaan was a military target, the fact that they fight their war by hiding behind innocent women and children is what causes this kind of collatoral damage. The skulking rebellion killed the people of Alderaan- they would never been in the crossfire if the rebellion had faced the Empire out in the open like men.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Putria » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:18 pm
JJ Place wrote:Putria wrote:
In the EU, "New Alderaan" is indeed founded.
Secondly, not-every-single Alderaan citizen was on the homeworld.
New Alderaan was founded by 60,000 Alderaan citizens in exile off of Alderaan. The remaining 1.97 billion citizens of Alderaan where killed in the blast. The second liberation of New Alderaan brought the entire population of Alderaan citizens down to 13,000, from over 1,970,000,000 citizens. The population founding the new world is minute, compared to those killed by the Death Star's blast.

by Wikkiwallana » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:46 pm
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:They had the right to secede and not be a part of the Republic. The fact that dozens of extra-Republic organizations existed proved this. It was their attempted execution of Republican diplomatic representatives that started the fighting, and in the large, the warmongering of Palpatine.
I'm not sure that I agree. While certain outer rim worlds were beyond the governance of the centralised Galactic republic, I don't think that translates to a right to secede. Tatooine is in huttspace, for one thing- which explains why they weren't directly administered by the galactic republic. However that is EU. Nevertheless, Tatooine could just well be frontier. Same goes for Kamino, really, which is waaay out on the edge of the outer rim.
Apart from those two, we don't hear of a single world that is not in the Galactic Repiblic.
Second of all, the Galactic Republic would never have fought against what they described as 'separatists' in a giant war, if people were simply allowed to leave.

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Orangi » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:48 pm

by Offenheim » Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:43 am
Der Teutoniker wrote:Offenheim wrote:The only civilians killed are the contractors on the second Death Star.
EU: The First Death Star was constructed by slaves (prisoners I think.)
Not sure if the Second Death Star was built with slave labor, I'd actually imagine that it was made by an Imperial Labor Crew... and likely not "civilians" in any meaningful sense.
It's also possible that many contractors were evacuated. The Emperor knew that an attack was coming, might as well get all non-essential crew off the station in case something goes wrong.

by GreaterPacificNations » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:39 am
Not really. We destroyed entire cities all the time here on earth. Alderaan was more like a city-state in the scale of the Galactic Empire. It's odd that they only had one livable planet in their system.Tahar Joblis wrote:The difference between "invade" and "destroy" is a pretty significant way.
We don't know that it was wholly unnecessary. We can only assume that if the monarch and the heir apparent of Alderaan themselves were rebel agent, that Alderaan would have been a hotbed of rebel activity. They were removing a port in the storm for rebels on the run.A country which has a leadership which harbours, abets, and colludes with terrorists hostile to a powerful nation's interests gets invaded- lots of innocents die as inevitable collateral damage as this hub of state sponsored terrorism is neutralised.
A planet which has a leadership which harbours, abets, and colludes with terrorists hostile to a powerful nation's interests gets destroyed- lots of innocents die as collateral damage wholly unnecessarily as this hub of state sponsored terrorism is neutralised.
In a galaxy full of populated systems, many of which have many planets, an empire destroys a single planet under the control ofan enemy organisation.itself.
Fixed for factual accuracy.
I'd say you'd be wrong. You think democracy held the world by the balls in the cold war? MAD did. Now if USA dropped a few tactical nukes on Iraq, the world wouldn't plunge into nuclear war. But America could expect a fierce global response from virtually all allies and rivals- not just Russia. Long standing strategic parters would distance themselves from them, Rivals would be more justified in hard line negotiations in even unreleated diplomatic spheres. The world runs on 'soft power' these days- which is built on international rapport and diplomacy. USA would lose lots and lots of face- which would harm the nation's long term interests.On a planet full of populated countries, many of which have many cities, an military power destroys two cities under the control of an enemy organisation.
The numbers aren't all that important- the main thing is that they are big- and show an inordinately high collateral damage ratio.
That was the extent of my comparison, to show that destroying a planet that is a known hub of terrorism, and accepting the collateral damage, is akin to bombing the shit out of some place full of terrorists, knowing 90% of the people that will die are innocent.
Horror, but the wrong kind of horror. Anyhow, the problem wasn't that they wouldn't face negative reactions from their subjects after they did it- It was that they did not have the obstacle of a community of also powerful and armed peers who didn't want them to do that- and could prevent them from doing so simply with posturing.
Which do you think kept Bush from using even small "tactical" nukes? His "buddy" Putin, or the notion that he'd be out on his ass in 2004?
I say (B).
And yet look to the countless thousands of sacking, razings, carpet bombings, and couple of nukings of cities that weren't counted as genocide. Why? Oh because if you killing lots of civilians without the purposeful intent of simply exterminating them, then it isn't genocide, it's an unnacceptably high rate of collateral damage in a strategic military campaign.I'd say it's more like doing in a city. Given the context. They had thousands of human realms. The empire destroyed one single planet that had a leadership that was not only sympathetic, but helpful to an insurrectionary terrorist organisation.
A city-state with its own distinctive culture, ethnicity, traditions, et cetera.
Doing so in the modern day would easily qualify as genocide. Look! You can kill mere thousands of people IRL and have it be genocide! Your appeal to scale is hereby dismissed.
No, the emperor does know. Not only did he issue a death warrant for Bail Organa when he first took power (unsuccessful and apparently withdrawn), but he correctly intercepted an Alderaanian consular ship which was indeed carrying plans of the death star. Additionally, later in the film we discover he leaked the plans simply to lure the rebellion out.No it wasn't, not at all. We know that Bail Organa worked with Obi Wan Kenobi and Yoda, we know that his daughter did the same. Together they are this and the next generation of Alderaanian leadership. That is like having a working relationship with Osama bin laden. These jedi fundamentalists were sworn with religious fervor to the destruction of the empire simply because of the Emperor's faith conflicted with their own. Alderaan was a sponsor of insurrection and rebellion in the Galactic empire, and so you can say they were justified in striking it- if not wise.
We know; the Emperor does not. The evidence Vader had on hand after capturing Leia amounted to exactly that - tracing a directional signal sent from the last known location of a Chinese spy and finding Caroline Kennedy on a yacht in that general direction, and blowing up Massachusetts when interrogating her didn't reveal the presence of any plans.
Right, but I'm not talking about a nuke. I'm talking about the wanton and reckless slaughter of millions of innocent civilians being considered as collateral damage when effected in pursuit of a legitimate tactical goal.Their attitude may have been careless, but their tools much better. There have been documented roughly 100,000 direct civilian casualties (ref); a total number of excess deaths (1-1.5 million) mostly via indirect cause (health effects). The ratio of combatant to civilian deaths may be awful, but that has to do with the very small number of combatants. In the general neighborhood of a million civilians died in the Vietnam War (ref).
Yes, we wish there had been fewer, and it is a great scandal that the US army was comparatively careless; but it was not a bloody invasion, and even the deaths indirectly caused, via the state of unrest and occupation, are far beneath that that a single megaton device landing in the middle of Baghdad would have inflicted.
Careful on that godwin trigger. The scale is important- as even a strategically justified bombing campaign that destroyed every man woman and child in the middle east probably would be considered genocide, even if it wasn't done for that purpose. But Alderaan wasjust a planet- and planets in the Glactic Empire are plentiful. The point is that it doesn't qualify simply due to egregiousness alone.See above. I have thoroughly debunked the appeal to scale. The destruction of Alderaan is indisputably monstrous and cannot be justified with anything less mind-boggling than what Holocaust apologists deploy.
However, Lucas didn't make a comparison to my argumentive defence of the strategic validity of a death-star strike on Alderaan to defence of the Holocaust- something you've done twice now, proving wonderfully both the spirit and point of Godwins law- that we can be arguing something like star wars and still someone has to make comparisons between their opponent's argument and nazism.Aaaand godwin.
You mean Lucas loses? He's the one that decided to design the Empire after the Nazis. No, I'm not kidding. I also already pointed this out.
Nice try, but we weren't arguing about the aesthetic design cues behind the empire. We were talking about the strategic justifiablity and validity of a death star strike against a terror state- and you of your own accord chalked it up to holocaust denial. Thats a godwin.Don't like comparisons to Nazis? Then pick a subject that doesn't involve fascism, jackbooted thugs, and the triumph of totalitarianism over anything resembling individual rights.
by The Matthew Islands » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:18 am
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by New East Ireland » Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:41 am

by Yaltabaoth » Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:07 am
by Meridiani Planum » Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:17 am

by GreaterPacificNations » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:00 am
Meridiani Planum wrote:
I've scanned through the script for Ep II, and what you say appears to be true. Here is all that Count Dooku really says on the subject:
COUNT DOOKU
The Chancellor means well, M'Lady
but he is incompetent. He has
promised to cut the bureaucracy,
but the bureaucrats are stronger
than ever, no? Senator, the
Republic cannot be fixed. It is
time to start over. The
democratic process in the Republic
is a sham, a shell game played
on the voters. It will not be long
before the cult of greed, called
the Republic, will lose even the
pretext of democracy and freedom.
The thing is... Count Dooku is probably right about all that he says here, although for more reasons than he is letting on. I still think it would have been great if Chancellor Palpatine would have somehow failed to get the Republic to refuse the requests of the Separatists to leave, thus allowing them to do so. It might have unwittingly allowed the creation of something good.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Holy Marsh, Ostroeuropa
Advertisement