Xsyne wrote:None of them. Instead, we should start unrecognizing recognized nations.
Which ones then?
Advertisement

by West Vandengaarde » Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:56 am
Xsyne wrote:None of them. Instead, we should start unrecognizing recognized nations.

by Horsefish » Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:57 am
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.

by New East Ireland » Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:16 pm
Archnar wrote:Know that I think about it the British Antarctic Territory should probably be recognised

by Beringovia » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:47 pm
Pingxiang wrote:Beringovia wrote:The thread, as I understand it, is about recognition of de-facto independent states. The current government of Purto Rico does not claim to be independent, and does not seek independence. You may not be aware of this but Puerto Rico has a democratically elected government, and there have been three referendums between 1967 and 1998 in Puerto Rico's political status. In each case fewer than 5% of Puerto Ricans voted for independence. Yes, there are some Puerto Ricans who want independence, but they are definitely not the majority.
Do you have a for the establishment of a second RP republic in 1950? I could find no references to it, though 1950 was the year that the US Congress passed enabling legislation for holding the convention which, ultimately, drew up PR's current constitution.
I'm not as familiar with the situation in Greenland, but my impression is that it is esentially similar in that it is not independent but does have a democratically elected government which exercices a great deal of autonomy, but does not claim independence, or seek independence.
Heard someone say the govt. of PR. is democratic in that they have elections every four years but during those four years they are dictatorial since they do not listen to the people. If the people complain they say that the elections are in four years. So every four years the same thing continues. It is has if they are manipulating democracy.
Read this on when they declared Independence for a second time (Second Republic)
http://nylatinojournal.com/home/puerto_ ... ution.html
Found a talk show that talked about it - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgMsMiVvZJk
Concerning Greenland, the Greenlanders had a referendum in 2008 which they got a majority Yes vote for more autonomy. So the Danes gave them more autonomy in 2009. There Inuit language would become official language and more revenue sharing for the Greenlanders. If they are able to become independent in the future they would be the first Inuit Independent nation. Inuit and Eskimos are under flags of other nations.
Read this - http://factoidz.com/greenland-a-fight-for-autonomy/
and this
http://tumeke.blogspot.com/2008/11/gree ... olony.html

by Unilisia » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:55 pm
Kemaliste wrote:East Turkestan, Bashkortostan, Chuvashia, Gagauzia, Crimea, Tatarstan, Tuva, Altai Republic, Karachay-Cherkessia, Khakassia, Yakutiya, Kabardino-Balkaria, Taymyria, Karakalpakstan, Salarstan (aka Xunhua Salar), South Azerbaijan (part of Iran), Western Thrace
This is for dividersLong live Turks !

Tiami wrote:I bow before the mighty Uni.
Lackadaisical2 wrote:If it shocked Uni, I know I don't want to read it.
You win.
Kylarnatia wrote:Steep hill + wheelchair + my lap - I think we know where that goes ;)
Katganistan wrote:That is fucking stupid.
L Ron Cupboard wrote:He appears to be propelling himself out of the flames with explosive diarrhea while his mother does jazz hands.
Mike the Progressive wrote:Because women are gods, men are pigs, and we, the males, deserve to all be castrated.
Neo Arcad wrote:Uni doesn't sleep. She waits.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Collector: "Why are these coins all sticky?"

by West Vandengaarde » Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:06 pm
Unilisia wrote:Kemaliste wrote:East Turkestan, Bashkortostan, Chuvashia, Gagauzia, Crimea, Tatarstan, Tuva, Altai Republic, Karachay-Cherkessia, Khakassia, Yakutiya, Kabardino-Balkaria, Taymyria, Karakalpakstan, Salarstan (aka Xunhua Salar), South Azerbaijan (part of Iran), Western Thrace
This is for dividersLong live Turks !
Holy mother of fuck you just raped the Motherland

by -St George » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:39 am

by -St George » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:40 am

by Distruzio » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:42 am

by Vecherd » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:02 am

by -St George » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:08 am
Vecherd wrote:The Confederate States of America
Svalbard
Western-Norway
Basque country
Transinitsra
Dissolving the UK and giving Cornwall independence.
Bavaria

by Vecherd » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:11 am
-St George wrote:Vecherd wrote:The Confederate States of America
Svalbard
Western-Norway
Basque country
Transinitsra
Dissolving the UK and giving Cornwall independence.
Bavaria
Any of those actually profess a desire for independence? Aside from ETA, I'm not sure how well Basque separatism is supported in the Basque Country.

by -St George » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:20 am

by -St George » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:23 am
Ustex wrote:Kurdistan. 40 million people without a nation state is preposterous.

by Serbia and Herzegovina (Ancient) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:23 am

by Calldar » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:26 am
New East Ireland wrote:Antarctican Republic FTW!

by -St George » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:27 am

by Kemaliste » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:32 am
Ustex wrote:And anyway, if the treaty of Sèvres (1920) had been honoured, Kurdistan would already have existed. The "national interests" of Turkey, Iran, and Iraq can cry me a river.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Infected Mushroom, Ryemarch, Shazbotdom, The Champions League, Umeria, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement