Yup.
Advertisement

by Nadkor » Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:52 pm

by Devious Imposters » Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:55 pm

by UCUMAY » Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:56 pm
Devious Imposters wrote:I just found out that Oral sex is illegal In Florida..
I am in soooooo much trouble...

by Fartsniffage » Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:56 pm
Nadkor wrote:Macapule Island wrote:In England, we have all sorts of archaic and useless laws. For example, it is illegal for a taxi not to have hay for the horses, and you can still kill a Scotsman inYork with a bow.Storica wrote:where i live people are alowed to shoot the welsh with a longbow if they are in the cathedral
False.

by Nadkor » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:03 pm

by The Republic of Lanos » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:05 pm
Devious Imposters wrote:I just found out that Oral sex is illegal In Florida..
I am in soooooo much trouble...

by Nadkor » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:05 pm

by Scandigrad » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:07 pm

by Shinjitai » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:09 pm

by Fartsniffage » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:12 pm
Nadkor wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Why is it false?
Because if you use a bow to kill a Scotsman or a Welshman in either York or the cathedral you will be arrested, charged, tried, and convicted of murder.
There may once have been a statute or something passed that, for example, said that you could shoot a Scotsman with a bow in York, but even if it has never been explicitly repealed the doctrine of implied repeal means it is no longer in force. If it even existed in the first place.


by Devious Imposters » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:12 pm

by Nadkor » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:14 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Nadkor wrote:
Because if you use a bow to kill a Scotsman or a Welshman in either York or the cathedral you will be arrested, charged, tried, and convicted of murder.
There may once have been a statute or something passed that, for example, said that you could shoot a Scotsman with a bow in York, but even if it has never been explicitly repealed the doctrine of implied repeal means it is no longer in force. If it even existed in the first place.
See, saying more than just "False" is far more illuminating than not.

by Fartsniffage » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:16 pm

by The darkness esscence » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:17 pm

by Shinjitai » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:18 pm

by Nadkor » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:24 pm

by Nadkor » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:24 pm

by Macapule Island » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:38 pm
Nadkor wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Why is it false?
Because if you use a bow to kill a Scotsman or a Welshman in either York or the cathedral you will be arrested, charged, tried, and convicted of murder.
There may once have been a statute or something passed that, for example, said that you could shoot a Scotsman with a bow in York, but even if it has never been explicitly repealed the doctrine of implied repeal means it is no longer in force. If it even existed in the first place.

by Macapule Island » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:41 pm

by Shinjitai » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:43 pm
Macapule Island wrote:Also, I just remembered that someone cannot enter Westminster Palace in a suit of armour.

by Nadkor » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:44 pm
Macapule Island wrote:Nadkor wrote:
Because if you use a bow to kill a Scotsman or a Welshman in either York or the cathedral you will be arrested, charged, tried, and convicted of murder.
There may once have been a statute or something passed that, for example, said that you could shoot a Scotsman with a bow in York, but even if it has never been explicitly repealed the doctrine of implied repeal means it is no longer in force. If it even existed in the first place.
That's obvious, but the point is the law still exists.
An extremely good lawyer could somehow get that person off, probably...
And thus it is not false.
Another, a pregnant woman is allowed to urinate into a policemans hat. This too is fact.

by New Unsociety » Wed Sep 07, 2011 3:42 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bagiyagaram, Kashimura, Minoa, Norse Inuit Union, Picairn, Querria, Spirit of Hope, The Notorious Mad Jack, The Rio Grande River Basin, Vassenor, Violene Islands
Advertisement