
Advertisement

by JuNii » Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:52 pm


by Hittanryan » Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:53 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:Hittanryan wrote:What the parents thought would depend on their political bent. It's a peaceful protest, not a riot.
That said, You-Gi-Owe wouldn't be making a stink about this if it was a teabagger protest blocking traffic somewhere. An openly conservative news outlet from the other side of the country probably isn't the most reliable source for an anti-corporate protest in New York, either.
Any arrests at Tea Party events?
Any Tea Party types cited for blocking traffic?
Any Tea Party type even leaving litter after one of their events?
I think the answer to those three questions is, "no".

by Genivaria » Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:54 pm
JuNii wrote:we're at the start of another ressession... I got an Idea... Let's try to shut down wall street!


by Revolutopia » Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:55 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:
Ya got me. I forgot about that particular incident and fringe group of the tea party.

by Augustus Este » Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:57 pm

by Genivaria » Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:58 pm
Augustus Este wrote:Wait, you do realize that revolution doesn't actually have to mean an armed uprising,it just means rapid change over a short period of time.

by Central Slavia » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:00 pm
Genivaria wrote:Augustus Este wrote:Wait, you do realize that revolution doesn't actually have to mean an armed uprising,it just means rapid change over a short period of time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velvet_Revolution
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]

by Gauthier » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:04 pm
Revolutopia wrote:You-Gi-Owe wrote:Ya got me. I forgot about that particular incident and fringe group of the tea party.
Got to love how when the side supporting your cause is arrest they are just fringe, yet the otherside the is arrested it proof of the entire movement.
Additionally, I should be no surprise that the police are more willing to arrest youths then they are people who are middle age or seniors, as one group has more political clout. Can you guess who?
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:05 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:Hittanryan wrote:What the parents thought would depend on their political bent. It's a peaceful protest, not a riot.
That said, You-Gi-Owe wouldn't be making a stink about this if it was a teabagger protest blocking traffic somewhere. An openly conservative news outlet from the other side of the country probably isn't the most reliable source for an anti-corporate protest in New York, either.
Any arrests at Tea Party events?
You-Gi-Owe wrote:I think the answer to those three questions is, "no".

by Gauthier » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:09 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:You-Gi-Owe wrote:Any arrests at Tea Party events?
Three people arrested at a tea party rally in Arizona.
Ten arrested here
this one with video.

by Iron Chariots » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:10 pm
Gauthier wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Three people arrested at a tea party rally in Arizona.
Ten arrested here
this one with video.
Remember, those are all fringe members who do not represent the actual Tea Party. Now if they had been union members, those thugs would have represented ALL unions.

by Beringovia » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:20 pm

by Patoma » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:20 pm

by Patoma » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:21 pm

by Romatticus » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:24 pm
ChaosPetra wrote:So let me get this straight. You say it's going to be historic, then say it's a ruse by law enforcement? You act untouchable, as if your knowledge of computers makes you God. Which, from what I have seen of your posts, that would sum up Anon perfectly. Idiots with a God complex. You all act as if you are noble crusaders, fighting for the voice of the people, when in reality, they hate you. Anon is an abnoxius, self-rightous, self-serving organisation, and I laugh everytime one is arrested. That is the lolz that I get from Anon. Wake up and smell the shit.
Those who act influence history. Those who sit and laugh at those with the gall and balls to act are nothing more than the impotent bystanders wallowing in their own intellectual-sophistry. I admire Anon, as I admire the leaders of WikiLeaks. They drop stones into the churning pool of life, and the tidal waves caused by their "antics" will influence history for the centuries to come, one dropped stone at a time. One DDoS attact at a time, and one tsunami of revealed telegrams at a time, these individuals will change the course of the future despite your scorn.

by Soviet Haaregrad » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:25 pm
Beringovia wrote:If parents had seen me take part in this sort of protest while I was in college, they would have shaken their heads, and admonished me to be careful, but as long as I was doing my school work and getting good grades i would not have been cut off.
If I had a kid in college and know he/she were taking part in this protests, I would have him or her kidnapped and deprogramed.

by Revolutopia » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:28 pm

by Soviet Haaregrad » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:30 pm
Revolutopia wrote:I don't know how my parents would react as during their youth teenagers and college students had a deep respect for the government and conservative society.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Vietnam_War_movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-wave_feminism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_movement
Yep, just a deep respect for authority and no protesting for them.

by Gauthier » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:31 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Revolutopia wrote:I don't know how my parents would react as during their youth teenagers and college students had a deep respect for the government and conservative society.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Vietnam_War_movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-wave_feminism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_movement
Yep, just a deep respect for authority and no protesting for them.
But those were dirty pinkos too and if it weren't for conservatives saving civilization from them you'd all be speaking Commie.

by Revolutopia » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:34 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Revolutopia wrote:I don't know how my parents would react as during their youth teenagers and college students had a deep respect for the government and conservative society.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Vietnam_War_movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-wave_feminism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_movement
Yep, just a deep respect for authority and no protesting for them.
But those were dirty pinkos too and if it weren't for conservatives saving civilization from them you'd all be speaking Commie.

by Romatticus » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:37 pm
Ailiailia wrote:Galla- wrote:
Because releasing classified military information and informants doesn't deny others the use of their own lives.
It may not be Wikileaks' stated aim, but it is their de facto aim.
It's ridiculous that you try to make me defend Wikileaks. Anonymous isn't Wikileaks, they differ in significant ways, and I'm done explaining it to you.
If you want to argue about the rights and wrongs of Wikileaks, go make a thread about it.


by Samdruptse » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:40 pm

by Farnhamia » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:44 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Chacapoya, Cuba 2022 RP, EuroStralia, Evinea, Glomb, Herador, Libertarian Right, Major-Tom, Port Caverton, Rary, Western Theram
Advertisement