Orlkjestad wrote:Forster Keys wrote:
Mountain that has a significant Orthodox monastery on it AFAIK. I'm agnostic too.Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Athos
Well, grazie.
Bitte schoen.
Advertisement

by Forster Keys » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:54 am
Orlkjestad wrote:Forster Keys wrote:
Mountain that has a significant Orthodox monastery on it AFAIK. I'm agnostic too.Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Athos
Well, grazie.

by Kalaspia-Shimarata » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:55 am
Orlkjestad wrote:Forster Keys wrote:
Mountain that has a significant Orthodox monastery on it AFAIK. I'm agnostic too.Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Athos
Well, grazie.

by Orlkjestad » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:56 am

by Kalaspia-Shimarata » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:59 am

by Forster Keys » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:00 am

by Starkindler » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:02 am
Saiwania wrote:The Bible has a solution to the Israel/Arab conflicts, give the land to the Jews. :p

by Forster Keys » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:02 am
Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:Discussion:
Simple if Turkey remains in Isreal, World War Three will start!

by Orlkjestad » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:11 am

by Barrasso » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:16 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Well the US would be stuck in a quandry. NATO vs. Israel. If Israel attacked, legally the US would have to fight Israel because Turkey is NATO.
Turkey attacks Israel? US would take Israel's side. Or not. Obama's stance on Israel make the Israelis skeptical if he would bring the US to their side during another Arab invasion. The US would have to choose which nation to lose if both fight each other.

by Orlkjestad » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:17 am
Barrasso wrote:The Republic of Lanos wrote:Well the US would be stuck in a quandry. NATO vs. Israel. If Israel attacked, legally the US would have to fight Israel because Turkey is NATO.
Turkey attacks Israel? US would take Israel's side. Or not. Obama's stance on Israel make the Israelis skeptical if he would bring the US to their side during another Arab invasion. The US would have to choose which nation to lose if both fight each other.
Why the hell do we have to side with anyone? i mean realisticaly speaking we will but really we should just let them fight their god damn war and worry about our selfs

by -St George » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:25 am
Barrasso wrote:The Republic of Lanos wrote:Well the US would be stuck in a quandry. NATO vs. Israel. If Israel attacked, legally the US would have to fight Israel because Turkey is NATO.
Turkey attacks Israel? US would take Israel's side. Or not. Obama's stance on Israel make the Israelis skeptical if he would bring the US to their side during another Arab invasion. The US would have to choose which nation to lose if both fight each other.
Why the hell do we have to side with anyone? i mean realisticaly speaking we will but really we should just let them fight their god damn war and worry about our selfs

by Orlkjestad » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:27 am

by Malgrave » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:35 am

Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

by Kalaspia-Shimarata » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:42 am

by Barrasso » Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:13 am
Orlkjestad wrote:Barrasso wrote:Why the hell do we have to side with anyone? i mean realisticaly speaking we will but really we should just let them fight their god damn war and worry about our selfs
Unfortunately, I fear that if we side with Israel, NATO will hate us. If we side with Turkey, Israel will hate us. If we stay neutral, everybody will hate us.

by Volnotova » Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:02 am
Kemaliste wrote:We proved our power in great war of independence against most powerful countries.

by UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:29 am
Vitaphone Racing wrote:UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:
1. Turkey has been purchasing the same type of stuff from the US that Israel has been buying. Though I don't know about the past two years.
2. Both countries engage in conscripting. Both have veterans from recent active combat operations. The Israelis against the Palestinians and the Turks against the Kurds.
Turkish equipment, while American, isn't of the same ilk as what Israel posseses. For example, Turkey still uses F-4 Phantoms, Israel uses F-15's. This trend is evident through every branch of their armed forces.
Think big picture. Turkey hasn't been involved in a full scale war since the days of the Ottoman empire. Israel has much, much more combat experience against a similarly equipped and similarly numbered foe.

by Keronians » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:30 am

by Keronians » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:32 am

by Angleter » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:34 am

by Keronians » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:36 am
Angleter wrote:Keronians wrote:
Maintain neutrality.
Turkey is an ally, and so is Israel.
Personally, if it ever came down to it, I'd abandon Israel in a flash.
Or send a peacekeeping force to the Eastern Med and stop them doing anything. Not that either side would probably be able to get the air superiority to actually launch a land invasion anyway, of course.

by UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:36 am
Costa Fiero wrote:I take it no one's bothered to look at the latest UN report which came out this month.

by UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:47 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Costa Fiero wrote:
You're forgetting the fact that it says Israel was wrong to react the way they did. My point was, it justifies the blockade.
The blockade itself is fine. Israel's ideas about how to enforce a blockade are what should be, and what are being, condemned.

by Farnhamia » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:48 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Necroghastia, Risottia, Rusozak, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies
Advertisement