No, I think there's just a few very interesting similarities between Wales and New Zealand.
Also, who said anything about anthropomorphism?
Advertisement
by 1000 Cats » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:46 pm
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Octabrinaland » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:48 pm
1000 Cats wrote:Octabrinaland wrote:
Maybe they're siblings.
Very, very long distance siblings.
Who just so happen to both like having sexy with anthropomorphic cloud creatures.
No, I think there's just a few very interesting similarities between Wales and New Zealand.
Also, who said anything about anthropomorphism?
by Terra Malatora » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:49 pm
by Alqania » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:49 pm
Iuuvic wrote:JJ Place wrote:
I could lump myself as a bisexual, then I'd be lying. I'm not specifically attracted only to males and females, that maintains the base of attraction to originate because of gender. I'm not pansexual either, my attractions are separate, from those declared that particular term. I'm not being high and might, I'm explaining my sexual life.
You would not be lying if you do, in-fact, have sex w/ both men & women w/o having a particular preferance for either.
Also, how do your attractions differ from pansexual attractions?
by Meryuma » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:50 pm
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by 1000 Cats » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:50 pm
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Umbra Ac Silentium » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:51 pm
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.
by Octabrinaland » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:52 pm
1000 Cats wrote:Octabrinaland wrote:
I just imagined that perhaps our friends who are attracted to sheep just may see them as more than animals.
Naw, the running joke is that there are more sheep in Wales/New Zealand than there are people, so the people find it a lot easier to locate the sheep of their dreams than the man/woman of their dreams. Leading to jokes like this (SFW, don't worry).
by Lauralestria » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:52 pm
by EvilDarkMagicians » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:53 pm
Takaram wrote:What can I say, cock is awesome.
by Eggy216 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:53 pm
by EvilDarkMagicians » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:54 pm
by Lauralestria » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:58 pm
The Darwinian People wrote:Bisexual, leaning significantly more to the straight side of things. I'd say 70% straight and 30% gay. But that's only when it comes to aesthetics. If I like a person because of their personality then gender doesn't really matter to me.
by Zepplien » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:59 pm
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:00 pm
Zepplien wrote:Do other bisexuals find it weird the Straits and gays only like one gender, I thought it was weird.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Umbra Ac Silentium » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:00 pm
Zepplien wrote:Do other bisexuals find it weird the Straits and gays only like one gender, I thought it was weird.
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.
by Iuuvic » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:04 pm
Alqania wrote:Iuuvic wrote:
You would not be lying if you do, in-fact, have sex w/ both men & women w/o having a particular preferance for either.
Also, how do your attractions differ from pansexual attractions?
By your definition, a virgin would have no sexual orientation/be asexual (or autosexual, if we include that). Sexual orientation is not determined solely by what genders one's sexual partners have.
Let people define themselves.
Me? I define myself sexually as gay, based on social gender. I am rather biemotional though.
by Alqania » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:09 pm
Iuuvic wrote:Alqania wrote:
By your definition, a virgin would have no sexual orientation/be asexual (or autosexual, if we include that). Sexual orientation is not determined solely by what genders one's sexual partners have.
Let people define themselves.
Me? I define myself sexually as gay, based on social gender. I am rather biemotional though.
Actually virgins would be covered under any of the 4 major orientations(if they have reached sexual maturity, if not their is no reason to classify their orientation); however, attraction to a sex is not the same as a sexual preferance.
I don't much care how someone defines themselves, but I'm sure their definition can be lumped into any of the four major categories. Just because you are atracted to the individual does not mean that individuals sex is all the sudden nonexistant; or that when you are having sex w/ that person they are genderless (even when discussing inter-sex peoples you could say you are bi-sexual, in some way).
To put it simply: For the sake of classification, everyone gets a title.
by JJ Place » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:11 pm
Iuuvic wrote:JJ Place wrote:
I could lump myself as a bisexual, then I'd be lying. I'm not specifically attracted only to males and females, that maintains the base of attraction to originate because of gender. I'm not pansexual either, my attractions are separate, from those declared that particular term. I'm not being high and might, I'm explaining my sexual life.
You would not be lying if you do, in-fact, have sex w/ both men & women w/o having a particular preferance for either.
Also, how do your attractions differ from pansexual attractions?
by EvilDarkMagicians » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:15 pm
by Iuuvic » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:15 pm
Alqania wrote:Iuuvic wrote:
Actually virgins would be covered under any of the 4 major orientations(if they have reached sexual maturity, if not their is no reason to classify their orientation); however, attraction to a sex is not the same as a sexual preferance.
I don't much care how someone defines themselves, but I'm sure their definition can be lumped into any of the four major categories. Just because you are atracted to the individual does not mean that individuals sex is all the sudden nonexistant; or that when you are having sex w/ that person they are genderless (even when discussing inter-sex peoples you could say you are bi-sexual, in some way).
To put it simply: For the sake of classification, everyone gets a title.
So you want to label everyone in one of four categories? Why do you feel the need to do that?
by Trotskylvania » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:16 pm
Lessnt wrote:Women can either be Bi or straight.
Men can either be straight or gay.
Anything else means the person is confused and fooling themselves.
My opinions.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Google [Bot], Life empire, New Temecula, Post War America, Statesburg
Advertisement