
I think that Japan, South Korea, and the US are the only countries in the developed world with the death penalty.
Advertisement

by Keronians » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:34 am


by Delanshar » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:34 am

by Keronians » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:35 am
Delanshar wrote:-St George wrote:It costs more to execute them.
I'm so damn sick of that argument.
A bullet costs around 8-40 cents, keeping them alive for their entire lives as well as providing security, housing, etc, costs well into the hundreds of thousands.
Execution per se doesn't cost more than keeping them alive, nobody can argue that it does. It's just all the stupid bureaucracy and endless bs appeals (which are done to satisfy you lot) added to the fact that the prisoner isn't dead yet (thus your still paying for everything I mentioned before) that make executions costly.
In other words...
appeals are what make the death penalty so expensive, the reason there are so many appeals is to satisfy the anti-death crowd (you). Ergo, executions are only expensive to satisfy you thus you can't complain about it's cost since your the reason for it.
I'm in favor of a quick bullet to the head within one week of the guilty verdict.


by Delanshar » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:35 am

by Horsefish » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:36 am
Delanshar wrote:pff....Americans aren't afraid of what a few fringe bleeding hearts have to say: We administer true justice.
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.

by Keronians » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:36 am

by Alyakia » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:37 am

by Keronians » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:37 am

by Delanshar » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:38 am
Keronians wrote:Delanshar wrote:
I'm so damn sick of that argument.
A bullet costs around 8-40 cents, keeping them alive for their entire lives as well as providing security, housing, etc, costs well into the hundreds of thousands.
Execution per se doesn't cost more than keeping them alive, nobody can argue that it does. It's just all the stupid bureaucracy and endless bs appeals (which are done to satisfy you lot) added to the fact that the prisoner isn't dead yet (thus your still paying for everything I mentioned before) that make executions costly.
In other words...
appeals are what make the death penalty so expensive, the reason there are so many appeals is to satisfy the anti-death crowd (you). Ergo, executions are only expensive to satisfy you thus you can't complain about it's cost since your the reason for it.
I'm in favor of a quick bullet to the head within one week of the guilty verdict.
So we execute more innocents, amirite?

by Keronians » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:38 am

by Alyakia » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:38 am
Delanshar wrote:-St George wrote:It costs more to execute them.
I'm so damn sick of that argument.
A bullet costs around 8-40 cents, keeping them alive for their entire lives as well as providing security, housing, etc, costs well into the hundreds of thousands.
Execution per se doesn't cost more than keeping them alive, nobody can argue that it does. It's just all the stupid bureaucracy and endless bs appeals (which are done to satisfy you lot) added to the fact that the prisoner isn't dead yet (thus your still paying for everything I mentioned before) that make executions costly.
In other words...
appeals are what make the death penalty so expensive, the reason there are so many appeals is to satisfy the anti-death crowd (you). Ergo, executions are only expensive to satisfy you thus you can't complain about it's cost since your the reason for it.
I'm in favor of a quick bullet to the head within one week of the guilty verdict.
by Alyakia » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:39 am
Delanshar wrote:
notice I said AFTER a guilty verdict..
contrary to popular belief, an appeal isn't a new trial,
An appeal simply means that the convicted is sprouting out random reasons why they thing they shouldn't be killed "I'm old, I won't do it again- promise!" etc

by Keronians » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:39 am
Delanshar wrote:
notice I said AFTER a guilty verdict..
contrary to popular belief, an appeal isn't a new trial,
An appeal simply means that the convicted is sprouting out random reasons why they thing they shouldn't be killed "I'm old, I won't do it again- promise!" etc

by Greater Nilfgaard » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:40 am

by Horsefish » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:40 am
Delanshar wrote:notice I said AFTER a guilty verdict..
contrary to popular belief, an appeal isn't a new trial,
An appeal simply means that the convicted is sprouting out random reasons why they thing they shouldn't be killed "I'm old, I won't do it again- promise!" etc

Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.

by Keronians » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:42 am

by Delanshar » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:42 am
Keronians wrote:Delanshar wrote:
notice I said AFTER a guilty verdict..
contrary to popular belief, an appeal isn't a new trial,
An appeal simply means that the convicted is sprouting out random reasons why they thing they shouldn't be killed "I'm old, I won't do it again- promise!" etc
Which has jackshit to do with the fact that appeals eliminate innocents from death row.
Around 8% of those on death row are wrongly convicted. Appeals process takes out 7% of them.

by Keronians » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:45 am

by Delanshar » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:49 am

by Yingtong Yiddle I Po » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:56 am
Delanshar wrote:pff....Americans aren't afraid of what a few fringe bleeding hearts have to say: We administer true justice.

by Burtonea » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:58 am
After decades of moral arguments reaching biblical proportions, after long, twisted journeys to the nation’s highest court and back, the death penalty may be abandoned by several states for a reason having nothing to do with right or wrong:
Money.
Turns out, it is cheaper to imprison killers for life than to execute them, according to a series of recent surveys. Tens of millions of dollars cheaper, politicians are learning, during a tumbling recession when nearly every state faces job cuts and massive deficits....
Death penalty trials are more expensive for several reasons: They often require extra lawyers; there are strict experience requirements for attorneys, leading to lengthy appellate waits while capable counsel is sought for the accused; security costs are higher, as well as costs for processing evidence — DNA testing, for example, is far more expensive than simple blood analyses. After sentencing, prices continue to rise. It costs more to house death row inmates, who are held in segregated sections, in individual cells, with guards delivering everything from daily meals to toilet paper."

by The Narexian Socialist States » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:50 am

by The Narexian Socialist States » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:54 am
Burtonea wrote:People who believe the death penalty is cheaper should read this article, if it hasn't been posted already.After decades of moral arguments reaching biblical proportions, after long, twisted journeys to the nation’s highest court and back, the death penalty may be abandoned by several states for a reason having nothing to do with right or wrong:
Money.
Turns out, it is cheaper to imprison killers for life than to execute them, according to a series of recent surveys. Tens of millions of dollars cheaper, politicians are learning, during a tumbling recession when nearly every state faces job cuts and massive deficits....
Death penalty trials are more expensive for several reasons: They often require extra lawyers; there are strict experience requirements for attorneys, leading to lengthy appellate waits while capable counsel is sought for the accused; security costs are higher, as well as costs for processing evidence — DNA testing, for example, is far more expensive than simple blood analyses. After sentencing, prices continue to rise. It costs more to house death row inmates, who are held in segregated sections, in individual cells, with guards delivering everything from daily meals to toilet paper."

by Strykla » Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:02 am
Keronians wrote:Delanshar wrote:
I'm so damn sick of that argument.
A bullet costs around 8-40 cents, keeping them alive for their entire lives as well as providing security, housing, etc, costs well into the hundreds of thousands.
Execution per se doesn't cost more than keeping them alive, nobody can argue that it does. It's just all the stupid bureaucracy and endless bs appeals (which are done to satisfy you lot) added to the fact that the prisoner isn't dead yet (thus your still paying for everything I mentioned before) that make executions costly.
In other words...
appeals are what make the death penalty so expensive, the reason there are so many appeals is to satisfy the anti-death crowd (you). Ergo, executions are only expensive to satisfy you thus you can't complain about it's cost since your the reason for it.
I'm in favor of a quick bullet to the head within one week of the guilty verdict.
So we execute more innocents, amirite?

by The Narexian Socialist States » Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:05 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Belgania, Best Mexico, Bombadil, Bovad, Castille de Italia, Celritannia, Dreria, Google [Bot], Hispida, Luna Amore, Pizza Friday Forever91, South Miruva, The Two Jerseys
Advertisement