Outer Chaosmosis wrote:Enemies? It is very telling that you think in such terms.
Isn't it? I find ideology a very important matter.
Advertisement

by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:16 pm
Outer Chaosmosis wrote:Enemies? It is very telling that you think in such terms.

by Trotskylvania » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:16 pm
Militia Alliance wrote:The IRS agent gets scared of a little fairy but is willing to shove a foot long hunk of meat down her throat...
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

by Outer Chaosmosis » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:18 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Isn't it? I find ideology a very important matter.

by Broncanus » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:19 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:And how is he not in a greater position than Bachmann, of all people?
They're both human. The least he could do is not sound like that whiny anarchist you mentioned and just call her Rep. or Mrs.. It's not a very hard thing to do at all, and demonstrates a higher level of maturity than Bachmann will ever know.

by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:21 pm
Outer Chaosmosis wrote:Again, that (and your particular take on the matter) sounds like a personal problem. Pathetic, really.

by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:21 pm
Broncanus wrote:it what way did he ever sound whiny or like an anarchist? NEVER. he should "you should be ashamed cause im a second class citizen because of you"
please point out where anti government plays into that? please point me to the whiny part.
being whiny is when you stub your toe and bitch about it for 3 days.
standing up for your rights its telling an elected official that you will not be called a barbarian and sit and take it like a good lap dog!

by Outer Chaosmosis » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:23 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Oh dear me. I've been insulted. On the internet.

by Buffett and Colbert » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:23 pm
Broncanus wrote:standing up for your rights its telling an elected official that you will not be called a barbarian and sit and take it like a good lap dog!
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:23 pm
Outer Chaosmosis wrote:No, you have been told something worth knowing about yourself. You are welcome, by the way. Whether you chose to acknowledge it is, I would suppose, your own business. But please, do not let me interrupt your delusional reduction of the world to an ugly game of "Us" vs "Them."

by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:24 pm
Polruan wrote:I've never seen a flattering definition of "ideology", if you mean "principles" then sure.
1. A system of ideas and ideals, esp. one that forms the basis of economic or political policy:

by Outer Chaosmosis » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:29 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Dear me, this one has claws.

by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:31 pm
Outer Chaosmosis wrote:Fascinating. You truly cannot escape this oppositional mindset of yours. Any comment is either an attack to which you must respond or a friendly move that you must support. You are incapable of seeing constructive criticism. As a result, I would imagine that, jesting aside, you could not, in fact, be a "contenda" even if you wanted to (as you seem to). Tell me, have you always had this problem or has it arisen in response to some trauma or other in your life? Or, perhaps, is it a response to generalized feelings of inadequacy?

by Devious Imposters » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:32 pm

by Outer Chaosmosis » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:35 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:It all started when I was a boy. My grandfather regularly pressured me to join the Imperial Navy, and I continually tried to remind him Japan's glory days were over. Those were dark times indeed.

by Trotskylvania » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:35 pm
Outer Chaosmosis wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Dear me, this one has claws.
Fascinating. You truly cannot escape this oppositional mindset of yours. Any comment is either an attack to which you must respond or a friendly move that you must support. You are incapable of seeing constructive criticism. As a result, I would imagine that, jesting aside, you could not, in fact, be a "contenda" even if you wanted to (as you seem to). Tell me, have you always had this problem or has it arisen in response to some trauma or other in your life? Or, perhaps, is it a response to generalized feelings of inadequacy?

Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:37 pm
Outer Chaosmosis wrote:And yet you persist in an oppositional mindset reminiscent of those very "glory days!" I think we are looking at classic displacement: you sublimate your feelings about being unable to live up to your grandfather's impossible expectations by mentally substituting a narrative of Grand Conflict; an ersatz struggle worthy of those expectations.

by Outer Chaosmosis » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:41 pm
Trotskylvania wrote:Playing psychiatrist on the internet is certainly a constructive, respectful attitude

by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:43 pm
Outer Chaosmosis wrote:And it would appear I have discovered still more misplaced antagonism! Tell me, do you always feel the need to intervene in conflicts involving others? Does it, perhaps, fulfill some need, on your part, to "save" people? Or, perhaps, your inclinations tend more towards being a judge, a figure imposing order upon a world that has been (by your reckoning) cruel or unfair to you? Does it make you feel better to make comments like the one above? Does it let you pretend to be in control when, in fact, your own life is characterized by feelings of deep insecurity?

by Canadian Davsland » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:43 pm

by Honyockers » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:47 pm

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:48 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Outer Chaosmosis wrote:And it would appear I have discovered still more misplaced antagonism! Tell me, do you always feel the need to intervene in conflicts involving others? Does it, perhaps, fulfill some need, on your part, to "save" people? Or, perhaps, your inclinations tend more towards being a judge, a figure imposing order upon a world that has been (by your reckoning) cruel or unfair to you? Does it make you feel better to make comments like the one above? Does it let you pretend to be in control when, in fact, your own life is characterized by feelings of deep insecurity?
Perhaps your need to analyze and disparage others in a manner you probably feel is subtle is borne from a subconscious desire to correct your own inner demons?
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:49 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Perhaps your need to analyze and disparage others in a manner you probably feel is subtle is borne from a subconscious desire to correct your own inner demons?
*puts on spectacles* I-AHEM AHEM... I belief zat ihr ubsession viz analyzis schtems vrom an unvulfilled longing. Vere you... abused zeksually as a kinder? Neverzeless, ihr problemz schtem vrom ihr unfulfilled zeksual vantasies. Ihr vater's penis made you jealous, perghaps? No matter, ze true problem ist ihr unrezolved veelings tovawrdz ihr mutter. You lash out, perhapz in vrustration at ihr inability to akt on it, ja?

by Seperates » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:50 pm
Honyockers wrote:In the real world the practice of having sex with the same gender is deviate (a person whose sexual behavior departs from the norm in a way that is considered socially or morally unacceptable). By real world I mean nature, not the the world of the humans pretending they are gods! Be as gay as you like but you are still a deviate and will be shunned.

by Trotskylvania » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:51 pm
Outer Chaosmosis wrote:Trotskylvania wrote:Playing psychiatrist on the internet is certainly a constructive, respectful attitude
And it would appear I have discovered still more misplaced antagonism! Tell me, do you always feel the need to intervene in conflicts involving others? Does it, perhaps, fulfill some need, on your part, to "save" people? Or, perhaps, your inclinations tend more towards being a judge, a figure imposing order upon a world that has been (by your reckoning) cruel or unfair to you? Does it make you feel better to make comments like the one above? Does it let you pretend to be in control when, in fact, your own life is characterized by feelings of deep insecurity?
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cachard Calia, Cannot think of a name, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Ifreann
Advertisement