The Parkus Empire wrote:Coccygia wrote:If somebody is amoral a la Harry Lime they would see nothing wrong with torturing someone to death just for laughs. Not Mr. Lime's thing, I admit, but consider the Marquis de Sade, for example. Amoral with a taste for inflicting pain (mostly in his fiction, admittedly.) Or mobsters like Whitey Bulger. The two things overlap and are both reprehensible.
I'm saying that Harry Lime didn't derive satisfaction directly from the suffering of others, and thus isn't a good example to use for an immoral (it looks like you're using "amoral" to mean "immoral", here) sadist. I mean, fuck, out of all the comparisons you could have drawn from abundant literature and history to someone who wanted to rape and torture just 'cuz, Harry Lime was a poor option. Marquis de Sade would have been much more apt. Bulger, not so much, as he wasn't a sociopath despite his being sadistic.
Whitey wasn't a sociopath? Oh well, I'll let that slide, I was just using him as an example of a vicious mob boss. I don't know all that much about the guy but he seems like a sociopath to me.
Actually I looked back at my original post in the other thread...I was using Lime as an example of someone with no moral scruples whatsoever (which is what I mean by amoral, which is pretty much the same as a sociopath or psychopath), not a sadist (I understood Furious Grandmothers' post in that sense - that he had no compunction about killing for $1,000,000, and copnsidered the "new experience" factor a bonus - not the same exactly as sadism).
My main point is that, fine, Lime isn't a sadist, he's just as bad if not worse. Not being a sadist doesn't really make him any better.
Someone like him could probably do more damage than a sadist, because of his indifference to his victims.
And anyway...we're talking about a fictional character here. Kind of pointless to analyze him as though he were real. Of course there are plenty of real-life guys like Lime.
Still, I rather enjoyed the quibbling.



