Serrland wrote:Mosasauria wrote:Source?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14259356
the neo-nazi bit is mostly conjecture based on information available.
Seems like this was in connection with the bombings...
Advertisement

by Mosasauria » Fri Jul 22, 2011 7:56 pm
Serrland wrote:Mosasauria wrote:Source?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14259356
the neo-nazi bit is mostly conjecture based on information available.

by Tekania » Fri Jul 22, 2011 7:57 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Veblenia wrote:
First, there's no indication the shooter was also the bomber. Second, how is this not terrorism? A bomb was detonated outside a government building, and the members of the Labour Party youth wing were massacred. It's pretty straightforward political violence, possibly a group activity.
Violence and/or damage to property to attempt to institute change in the policy or behaviour of a government? Almost definitively 'terrorism', isn't it?

by New Freedomstan » Fri Jul 22, 2011 7:57 pm
GraySoap wrote:New Freedomstan wrote:It seems to have been because he thought the Labour Party (ie, the government) are to soft on muslims.
Source please? So far everything about this storing mentioned earlier has been, more or less wrong. First it was Muslim terrorists, then a gang of Neo-Nazis, and now just some guy who appears to have been very upset... about something.

by Derpusherpus » Fri Jul 22, 2011 7:58 pm

by Derpusherpus » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:01 pm
Veblenia wrote:Derpusherpus wrote:Unno if I'd call it terrorism, bro. I think the guy is just a psycho with a conviction.
First, there's no indication the shooter was also the bomber. Second, how is this not terrorism? A bomb was detonated outside a government building, and the members of the Labour Party youth wing were massacred. It's pretty straightforward political violence, possibly a group activity.

by Glorious Norway » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:03 pm
Derpusherpus wrote:Veblenia wrote:
First, there's no indication the shooter was also the bomber. Second, how is this not terrorism? A bomb was detonated outside a government building, and the members of the Labour Party youth wing were massacred. It's pretty straightforward political violence, possibly a group activity.
Both attacks were perpetrated by the same person. The news, read them.
Ok yes, it was terrorism.

by Veblenia » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:03 pm
Glorious Norway wrote:Veblenia wrote:
First, there's no indication the shooter was also the bomber. Second, how is this not terrorism? A bomb was detonated outside a government building, and the members of the Labour Party youth wing were massacred. It's pretty straightforward political violence, possibly a group activity.
Everything indicates that the shooter was also the bomber. Based on witness reports.

by Lackadaisical2 » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:04 pm
Icketopia wrote:Cameroi wrote:i would still more suspect capitalism chauvanists, or even our (america's) own intelligence services (who ARE perfectly capable of attacking even an allie, if they thought that was what it would take to keep them supporting an overly long extended knee-jerk military over reaction).
but i also think, whatever actually happened, especially if it was the latter, some poor retarded person who forgot to take their pills that morning is who will officially end up getting blamed.
Finally, a voice of reason
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by GraySoap » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:05 pm

by Herskerstad » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:05 pm
Derpusherpus wrote:Veblenia wrote:
First, there's no indication the shooter was also the bomber. Second, how is this not terrorism? A bomb was detonated outside a government building, and the members of the Labour Party youth wing were massacred. It's pretty straightforward political violence, possibly a group activity.
Both attacks were perpetrated by the same person. The news, read it.
Ok yes, it was terrorism.

by Glorious Norway » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:06 pm

by Mosasauria » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:07 pm

by Grave_n_idle » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:08 pm
Glorious Norway wrote:Rumours say that witnesses have seen him talking on a mobile phone, which might indicate that he had help.

by Veblenia » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:09 pm

by Gauthier » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:11 pm

by Greed and Death » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:14 pm

by Harata » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:15 pm
Gauthier wrote:Veblenia wrote:
I never claimed they weren't connected. I figured an accomplice might have planted the Oslo bomb.
Given that he was in a police uniform and intended to evade capture, it's not completely farfetched that he could have planned the attacks in an attempt to blame it on "Muslim extremism" and thus provoke the government towards hardline immigration and cultural policies.

by Glorious Norway » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:15 pm
Gauthier wrote:Veblenia wrote:
I never claimed they weren't connected. I figured an accomplice might have planted the Oslo bomb.
Given that he was in a police uniform and intended to evade capture, it's not completely farfetched that he could have planned the attacks in an attempt to blame it on "Muslim extremism" and thus provoke the government towards hardline immigration and cultural policies.

by Derpusherpus » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:16 pm

by Glorious Norway » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:16 pm
Harata wrote:Gauthier wrote:
Given that he was in a police uniform and intended to evade capture, it's not completely farfetched that he could have planned the attacks in an attempt to blame it on "Muslim extremism" and thus provoke the government towards hardline immigration and cultural policies.
Or he might've worn the uniform to get close to the people he was trying to kill. Judging by the scope of the attacks it seems unlikely that he would've expected to be able to escape, disguise or no.

by Harata » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:20 pm
Derpusherpus wrote:http://www.document.no/anders-behring-breivik/
Some of the tard's poorly written hatespeech on the internet about
Muslims and the left.

by Glorious Norway » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:23 pm

by Derpusherpus » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:25 pm
Glorious Norway wrote:Harata wrote:
Or he might've worn the uniform to get close to the people he was trying to kill. Judging by the scope of the attacks it seems unlikely that he would've expected to be able to escape, disguise or no.
He did wear the uniform for that reason. He came to the island, gathered the youth claiming to wanting to share information about the Oslo bombings, and then killed them, execution style.

by Glorious Norway » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:27 pm
Derpusherpus wrote:Glorious Norway wrote:
He did wear the uniform for that reason. He came to the island, gathered the youth claiming to wanting to share information about the Oslo bombings, and then killed them, execution style.
He must've been using a fully automatic gun to get that many kills before they'd all fled. I thought automatic guns were extremely hard to get your hands on here unless you're in the army. He was not.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Canarsia, Empire of Colia, EuroStralia, Forsher, La Xinga, Neu California, Ryemarch, Zalium
Advertisement