Gauthier wrote:Can anyone name a country in the modern age that has successfully kept a homogenous racial and ethnic composition by active legislation?
Arab nations, China, and Israel.
Advertisement

by -St George » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:47 am
The Matthew Islands wrote:-St George wrote:'People' are idiots. The general public are idiots. Think about it, those people that answer these polls about immigration, that appear in the Daily Fail, etc, are that chav family from down the estate, or the skinhead drunk in the local pub.
So everyone who is against tightening controls on immigration into a more controlled way, not stopping it outright just putting more controls on it, is an uneducated Chav or a Skinhead who hates foreigners? As opposed to people who acknowledging the benefits of Immigration but just want more control?
Do you live in an area with high amounts of Immigrants, or for lack of a better phrase, ethnic Minorities?

by EvilDarkMagicians » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:54 am

by Seigleterre » Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:39 am


by Molgravia » Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:53 am
Trixiestan wrote:Funny thing is, we've had black people in this country for literally centuries. For example, John Blanke:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/blackhistory/early_times/blanke.htm

by Angleter » Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:13 am
-St George wrote:The Matthew Islands wrote:So everyone who is against tightening controls on immigration into a more controlled way, not stopping it outright just putting more controls on it, is an uneducated Chav or a Skinhead who hates foreigners? As opposed to people who acknowledging the benefits of Immigration but just want more control?
Do you live in an area with high amounts of Immigrants, or for lack of a better phrase, ethnic Minorities?
You are confusing support for the BNP and the policies espoused by the Daily Fail for support for a reduction of immigration. It was the former I was addressing. Of course some people want immigration to be reduced, and some people make good arguments. However, the fact remains that we have international commits and pledges on immigration, due to membership of the EU, and leadership of the Commonwealth. Further to this, even with unemployment at 70 year highs, immigrants are still finding employment. Why? Because a large number of the unemployed don't want/will not work in jobs they perceive as crap. So what is the Employment Officer at this places to do? Not hire anyone and hope that little Jimmy Eight Kids will get off his ass and and reject benefits in order to work a job he sees as 'crap', or hire Abdul, just off the both, with a work visa, who'll work for minimum wage?
Its funny in a sad way that Tories want competition in everything but the job market.
by Alyakia » Sat Jul 23, 2011 2:30 pm
Angleter wrote:-St George wrote:You are confusing support for the BNP and the policies espoused by the Daily Fail for support for a reduction of immigration. It was the former I was addressing. Of course some people want immigration to be reduced, and some people make good arguments. However, the fact remains that we have international commits and pledges on immigration, due to membership of the EU, and leadership of the Commonwealth. Further to this, even with unemployment at 70 year highs, immigrants are still finding employment. Why? Because a large number of the unemployed don't want/will not work in jobs they perceive as crap. So what is the Employment Officer at this places to do? Not hire anyone and hope that little Jimmy Eight Kids will get off his ass and and reject benefits in order to work a job he sees as 'crap', or hire Abdul, just off the both, with a work visa, who'll work for minimum wage?
Its funny in a sad way that Tories want competition in everything but the job market.
The fact that we 'lead' the Commonwealth doesn't mean we have any commitment to them on immigration. The EU membership is an unfortunate commitment that we ought to remedy. And I'm all for allowing immigrants in to work here for a few months and then go home, but not for allowing them to stay for evermore if they so desire. Also, it may help if we actually encouraged Jimmy Eight Kids to get off his arse, instead of tolerating his conscious refusal to work.

by Forster Keys » Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:09 pm


by Liriena » Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:00 pm
H-Alba wrote:I would like to know what you think about the British National Party.
I personally find them as nothing more then racist cunts (Can I say that on this website? if not, sorry), and most people who are members of the BNP are racist ignorant people.
For example, the BNP song "Don't Unpack, You're Going Back" is one of the most idiotic and racist songs I have ever heard... I find it hard to believe people can like that song, let alone believe the things sung about, and what the party teaches! (For those who haven't heard it, here is a link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OqkMjx0 ... re=related)
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by The House of Petain » Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:02 pm

by Mosasauria » Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:05 pm

by Cthag-antil » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:32 am

by Cyber Utopia » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:42 am
Liriena wrote:I think they should all be sent to jail for life, and deprived of any means to communicate with the public.
I mean, if you allow a group of people like this to actually participate in a democratic system, you are seriously jeopardizing Human Rights and Democracy.
Feazanthia wrote:Remember - every time you chuck an asteroid at a planet, Bruce Willis gets a sappy self-sacrifice scene in a shitty movie.
Last edited by Jenrak on Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Fixed the spelling error in the title; you can thank me later.

by Liriena » Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:34 am
Cyber Utopia wrote:the Bigoted Numpty Party olololLiriena wrote:I think they should all be sent to jail for life, and deprived of any means to communicate with the public.
I mean, if you allow a group of people like this to actually participate in a democratic system, you are seriously jeopardizing Human Rights and Democracy.
Excluding people from democracy doesn't sound very democratic.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Wikipedia and Universe » Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:53 am
An ODECON Naval Analyst wrote:Superior tactics and training can in fact triumph over force of numbers and missile spam.
Bottle wrote:This is not rocket surgery, folks.
Senestrum wrote:This is relativity, the theory that takes everything we know about the world, bends it over, and fucks it to death with a spiked dildo.

by Gauthier » Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:03 am

by Southern United Africa » Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:15 am
If you mean the AWB that I think you mean, then true fucking that!Wikipedia and Universe wrote:When I first heard of them, their ties to the AWB pretty much gave away to me who they are.

by Serrland » Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:14 pm
Angleter wrote:-St George wrote:You are confusing support for the BNP and the policies espoused by the Daily Fail for support for a reduction of immigration. It was the former I was addressing. Of course some people want immigration to be reduced, and some people make good arguments. However, the fact remains that we have international commits and pledges on immigration, due to membership of the EU, and leadership of the Commonwealth. Further to this, even with unemployment at 70 year highs, immigrants are still finding employment. Why? Because a large number of the unemployed don't want/will not work in jobs they perceive as crap. So what is the Employment Officer at this places to do? Not hire anyone and hope that little Jimmy Eight Kids will get off his ass and and reject benefits in order to work a job he sees as 'crap', or hire Abdul, just off the both, with a work visa, who'll work for minimum wage?
Its funny in a sad way that Tories want competition in everything but the job market.
The fact that we 'lead' the Commonwealth doesn't mean we have any commitment to them on immigration. The EU membership is an unfortunate commitment that we ought to remedy. And I'm all for allowing immigrants in to work here for a few months and then go home, but not for allowing them to stay for evermore if they so desire. Also, it may help if we actually encouraged Jimmy Eight Kids to get off his arse, instead of tolerating his conscious refusal to work.
by The Matthew Islands » Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:18 pm
Serrland wrote:
This is a debate I'm following pretty closely. I am very seriously considering a job hunt in the UK (either England or Scotland) if I don't get into or choose not to go to grad school ( a decision I have to make within the next months). The immigration question is fascinating to me and could really have an impact on my later life.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by Serrland » Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:22 pm
The Matthew Islands wrote:Serrland wrote:
This is a debate I'm following pretty closely. I am very seriously considering a job hunt in the UK (either England or Scotland) if I don't get into or choose not to go to grad school ( a decision I have to make within the next months). The immigration question is fascinating to me and could really have an impact on my later life.
Relax. As I pointed out before, people in Britain know that there are benefits to Immigration and more or less want Immigration to continue, just not at current levels and with more control.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, Bovad, Cannot think of a name, Fractalnavel, Restructured Russia, Saiwana, The Sherpa Empire
Advertisement