NATION

PASSWORD

9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Saint Clair Island
Minister
 
Posts: 3233
Founded: Feb 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Saint Clair Island » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:44 pm

Unterzagersdorf wrote:
EternalNight wrote:
Unterzagersdorf wrote:
Now THAT is coincidence. What happened on 9/11 and the days before hand was executed on purpose. There were also NORAD drills going on the during the morning of 9/11 that had to do with hijacked aircraft and the insertion of false radar blips. This is why the aircraft were not intercepted. The NORAD pilots couldn't sort out the false incidents from the real ones. NORAD had never failed. On 9/11, they failed three times in one hour. They were deliberately confused.


One of the reasons the planes were not intercepted is that some of the bases with tactical fighter wings were closed and the squadrons that did scramble had to fly longer distances.

There is also the fact that though hijacking had happened before, turning planes into ASM's had not.


NORAD ran exercises in the days prior to 9/11 that dealt with turing hijacked planes into missiles.

Really? Well, maybe 9/11 was just a very realistic NORAD exercise.
Signatures are for losers.

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:45 pm

This feels like arguing with a religious person.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Unterzagersdorf
Diplomat
 
Posts: 541
Founded: Jul 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Unterzagersdorf » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:45 pm

Deleted
Last edited by Unterzagersdorf on Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05

User avatar
Rhodmhire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17421
Founded: Jun 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Rhodmhire » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:47 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:This feels like arguing with a religious person.


Unless it's Chuck Norris.

Because, you know, you don't argue with him in the first place.
Last edited by Rhodmhire on Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Part of me grew up here. But part of growing up is leaving parts of ourselves behind.

User avatar
Moreau Catholic High
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 410
Founded: Feb 15, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Moreau Catholic High » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:47 pm

We're calling for your evidence. Your claim is that 9/11 is an inside job.

Where is your evidence to back that claim up? You have produced none.
I think I kill threads.

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:47 pm

Unterzagersdorf wrote:If you call this evidence, then shame on you.


I NEVER stated a position. I've only been showing how your "evidence" doesn't count as evidence.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Kantria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1381
Founded: Sep 06, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Kantria » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:48 pm

Unterzagersdorf wrote:
Moreau Catholic High wrote:
Incorrect. This is how debate works. UT has provided his argument, and he has provided his evidence. His claim has been made.

Now it's your turn.


UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
You claim it's an inside job. The burden of proof is on you.


If you call this evidence, then shame on you.


Can't you just humor him? I mean, you've got to have some evidence that it was an inside job and not the doing of invisible magic snow pixies.
Straight, white, cis male U.S. American
Secular humanist
Social democrat
Transhumanist
Techno-utopian
Atheist (6.9)
Registered Democrat

I reserve the right to compromise, change my mind and otherwise ignore ideals in favor of pragmatic, effective solutions that benefit society. Small steps forward are still progress.

User avatar
Samatolian City-States
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Samatolian City-States » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:49 pm

The fact that the guy who came up with the theory hasn't been in any suspicious car accidents is enough to make me call bullshit.
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Corruption is evil. Therefore, power is evil. Absolute power is absolute evil.

User avatar
Unterzagersdorf
Diplomat
 
Posts: 541
Founded: Jul 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Unterzagersdorf » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:49 pm

Deleted
Last edited by Unterzagersdorf on Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:51 pm

Unterzagersdorf wrote:My evidence, based on observation, research, and thought, instead of reading some report put out by the government, is not considered "evidence" at all. Now that's fucked up.


OK, what is your evidence? So far all I've heard is coincidence. That's not exactly convincing. People use coincidences to defend the existence of god, too.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby North Suran » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:51 pm

Unterzagersdorf wrote:My evidence, based on watching Loose Change a couple of times and throwing darts at a poster of George Bush instead of reading some factual, well-informed report, is not considered "evidence" at all. Now that's fucked up.

Fixed.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111675
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:52 pm

Saint Clair Island wrote:
Unterzagersdorf wrote:
EternalNight wrote:One of the reasons the planes were not intercepted is that some of the bases with tactical fighter wings were closed and the squadrons that did scramble had to fly longer distances.

There is also the fact that though hijacking had happened before, turning planes into ASM's had not.


NORAD ran exercises in the days prior to 9/11 that dealt with turing hijacked planes into missiles.

Really? Well, maybe 9/11 was just a very realistic NORAD exercise.

Maybe that's all it was and the Towers are really still there, except everyone in the world bought into the faked footage shown by the government-controlled media (they are, you know, controlled by everyone except the companies that own them) that we all still think they're gone. The company that owns the World Trade Center keeps calling the news stations, trying to explain, but when they do they're dismissed and told it is a terrible, cruel thing to mock the people who lost loved ones. Then the company tries to explain that those people aren't dead, they're all still at the WTC, living on hot dogs and brats and stuff from push cart vendors, their friends don't see them, their families think they're dead, and that's when the news people hang up.

That's easily as plausible as saying that the attacks were staged by government agents who have kept their silence meticulously for almost eight full years. I laugh, Unterzagersdorf. And by the way, you're the one making the extraordinary claim, the burden of proof is on you. Your evidence must be better than that presented to debunk it and you need to have it accepted by credible sources, as, for instance, the NY Times, the Washington Post, Fox News, MSNBC, you know, those sorts of people.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Moreau Catholic High
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 410
Founded: Feb 15, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Moreau Catholic High » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:52 pm

Unterzagersdorf wrote:
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Unterzagersdorf wrote:If you call this evidence, then shame on you.


I NEVER stated a position. I've only been showing how your "evidence" doesn't count as evidence.


My evidence, based on observation, research, and thought, instead of reading some report put out by the government, is not considered "evidence" at all. Now that's fucked up.


Alright, cough up your observations and research and let's examine them and see if they hold water.
I think I kill threads.

User avatar
Saint Clair Island
Minister
 
Posts: 3233
Founded: Feb 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Saint Clair Island » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:53 pm

North Suran wrote:
Unterzagersdorf wrote:My evidence, based on watching Loose Change a couple of times and throwing darts at a poster of George Bush instead of reading some factual, well-informed report, is not considered "evidence" at all. Now that's fucked up.

Fixed.

I have evidence for my theory about aliens shooting JFK as well... just google "aliens shot jfk" and you'll find it!
Signatures are for losers.

User avatar
EternalNight
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 400
Founded: Jul 15, 2009
Benevolent Dictatorship

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby EternalNight » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:53 pm

Unterzagersdorf wrote:
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Unterzagersdorf wrote:If you call this evidence, then shame on you.


I NEVER stated a position. I've only been showing how your "evidence" doesn't count as evidence.


My evidence, based on observation, research, and thought, instead of reading some report put out by the government, is not considered "evidence" at all. Now that's fucked up.


Then if you have such "evidence", why not go to the Dept Of Justice?

On a nther side of this, to pull some stunt like this off would require a lot of people. Even assuming the George Bush, who was an incompetent twit, could put this all together there is one (well, many) flaw).

Anyone taking part in something like this would be executed if it got out. Assuming they were not just dragged from their homes and set on fire while alive. Considering how much other things are leaked, the odds of being able to keep this secret would be astronomically low.

You are accusing the US Government of High Treason. That is not something to be done lightly.
You think when you die you go to Heaven or Hell...
You come to US!


Hallowed are the First Triune

ΜΘΓ

User avatar
Unterzagersdorf
Diplomat
 
Posts: 541
Founded: Jul 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Unterzagersdorf » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:56 pm

Deleted
Last edited by Unterzagersdorf on Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05

User avatar
Kantria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1381
Founded: Sep 06, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Kantria » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:56 pm

EternalNight wrote:You are accusing the US Government of High Treason. That is not something to be done lightly.


I don't disagree with you, but, well...


lol
Straight, white, cis male U.S. American
Secular humanist
Social democrat
Transhumanist
Techno-utopian
Atheist (6.9)
Registered Democrat

I reserve the right to compromise, change my mind and otherwise ignore ideals in favor of pragmatic, effective solutions that benefit society. Small steps forward are still progress.

User avatar
Happi-Land III
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 47
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Happi-Land III » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:56 pm

Kalysk wrote:I think the- em, the 7 WTC collapsed due to explosives though.


No, they collapsed because of the tons of debris that rained upon it and led to a catastrophic structural failure. And the "puffs of smoke" coming from the World Trade Centers were cause of the explosive force of air from the impact rushing through floors and blowing out window and office shit.[/quote]

Didn't the Borders Bookstore motherlode get flattened with that?

If 9/11 really was a CIA job, they would have done a way better job. Also, if you believe in 9/11 conspiracies, you may as well believe in Kuiper Belt aliens, secret missions to Pluto, demonic sacrifices by world leaders, lizard-people ruling the earth and flying pigs. Thank you, goodnight and take your medication.
Last edited by Happi-Land III on Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I have a huge army, thousands of nukes, an economy of 97/100, a place in the First World and the most atheistic population in the region. And you have political correctness. Ha.

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby North Suran » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:56 pm

Saint Clair Island wrote:I have evidence for my theory about aliens shooting JFK as well... just google "aliens shot jfk" and you'll find it!

This was the first thing that came up when I Googled that.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Space Libertines
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Space Libertines » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:57 pm

North Suran wrote:
Unterzagersdorf wrote:My evidence, based on watching Loose Change a couple of times and throwing darts at a poster of George Bush instead of reading some factual, well-informed report, is not considered "evidence" at all. Now that's fucked up.

Fixed.

lmao
Ok, I think there is a chance that 9-11 might have been an inside job (keyword: might), but that editing right there is hilarious!

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby North Suran » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:58 pm

Unterzagersdorf wrote:A report that said it could not explain where the money to finance 9/11 came from, so it stated that the funding for 9/11 was of "little practical significance." Yeah, some well-informed report.

Well, since your entire argument seems to consist of "The Government planned 9/11; the facts are neither here nor there!", you're hardly one to criticise the document for not being well-informed.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Saint Clair Island
Minister
 
Posts: 3233
Founded: Feb 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Saint Clair Island » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:58 pm

Farnhamia wrote:Maybe that's all it was and the Towers are really still there, except everyone in the world bought into the faked footage shown by the government-controlled media (they are, you know, controlled by everyone except the companies that own them) that we all still think they're gone. The company that owns the World Trade Center keeps calling the news stations, trying to explain, but when they do they're dismissed and told it is a terrible, cruel thing to mock the people who lost loved ones. Then the company tries to explain that those people aren't dead, they're all still at the WTC, living on hot dogs and brats and stuff from push cart vendors, their friends don't see them, their families think they're dead, and that's when the news people hang up.

That's easily as plausible as saying that the attacks were staged by government agents who have kept their silence meticulously for almost eight full years. I laugh, Unterzagersdorf. And by the way, you're the one making the extraordinary claim, the burden of proof is on you. Your evidence must be better than that presented to debunk it and you need to have it accepted by credible sources, as, for instance, the NY Times, the Washington Post, Fox News, MSNBC, you know, those sorts of people.

No, it was a very realistic NORAD exercise. The towers are gone all right.

See, the air defense people kept fucking up the simulations during the exercise: failing to intercept the planes at the right time, or blowing them up with Sidewinders and killing all of the passengers within, or something. The general who was running the exercises finally went on down to the simulation rooms to complain: why were the results so bad? We have the best military in the world, dammit. And the colonel who was keeping an eye on the pilots said, it's not our fault, the men know it's a simulation, if there were a real event it'd be a lot easier for them to prevent it because it'd be a real threat. So the general said, all right, I'll send a few spec-ops to hijack some planes and fly them into buildings in new york and washington on tuesday, we'll see how well the boys hold up in a real emergency....

Needless to say, heads rolled at NORAD afterwards. It was officially blamed on terrorists, of course, because it just wouldn't look right for people to learn that the agency trusted with defending America's airspace had messed up.
Signatures are for losers.

User avatar
Saint Clair Island
Minister
 
Posts: 3233
Founded: Feb 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Saint Clair Island » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:59 pm

North Suran wrote:
Saint Clair Island wrote:I have evidence for my theory about aliens shooting JFK as well... just google "aliens shot jfk" and you'll find it!

This was the first thing that came up when I Googled that.

See? PROOF! Refute plz
Signatures are for losers.

User avatar
Saint Clair Island
Minister
 
Posts: 3233
Founded: Feb 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby Saint Clair Island » Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:00 pm

Comaack wrote:A week before Lincoln was shot he was in Monroe, Maryland.
A week before Kennedy was shot he was in Marilyn Monroe

Fixed the last bit for you.
Signatures are for losers.

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: 9/11 a inside job? Seriously?

Postby North Suran » Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:00 pm

Comaack wrote:-snip-

This clearly proves that the 1980s was just an elaborate hoax to get us to wear sparkly outfits and sing really shitty bubblegum pop.
Last edited by North Suran on Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: A m e n r i a, Aerlanica, Angeloid Astraea, Grinning Dragon, Point Blob, Reich of the New World Order, Riviere Renard

Advertisement

Remove ads