Is it OK to hit a girl?

[Grave_n_idle]

Women demand equal rights, and so they should be treated as such.

If a guy assaults me, I'll fight back. If a woman assaults me, I'll fight back. Equal rights, and not that I have anything against women, but if you want to be treated like a man then you're going to be treated like a man.

So only bum sex from now on?

[Germania Alliance]

Women demand equal rights, and so they should be treated as such.

If a guy assaults me, I'll fight back. If a woman assaults me, I'll fight back. Equal rights, and not that I have anything against women, but if you want to be treated like a man then you're going to be treated like a man.

So only bum sex from now on?

I'd rather have no sex in that case.

[Katonazag]

To the OP:

The only time it's ok for a man to hit a woman is if the woman has a deadly weapon or is endangering life. Otherwise, when force must be used to end a violent confrontation in said scenario, restraining her or putting her to the floor is more apropos. Throwing closed-fist punches is reserved for man-to-man.

[Primorea]

Women demand equal rights, and so they should be treated as such.

If a guy assaults me, I'll fight back. If a woman assaults me, I'll fight back. Equal rights, and not that I have anything against women, but if you want to be treated like a man then you're going to be treated like a man.

I completely agree. Don't you think women went from "we want equal rights" to "we want more priveleges"? I wouldn't be surprised if women made the rule saying it's not OK to hit a girl. But hey, I have nothing against women. I think both genders should be treated equally, and women should not be treated better than men.

[Grave_n_idle]

To the OP:

The only time it's ok for a man to hit a woman is if the woman has a deadly weapon or is endangering life. Otherwise, when force must be used to end a violent confrontation in said scenario, restraining her or putting her to the floor is more apropos. Throwing closed-fist punches is reserved for man-to-man.

Why?

Vaginas emit a no-fist field?

[Primorea]

Women demand equal rights, and so they should be treated as such.

If a guy assaults me, I'll fight back. If a woman assaults me, I'll fight back. Equal rights, and not that I have anything against women, but if you want to be treated like a man then you're going to be treated like a man.

So only bum sex from now on?

If a law is proposed saying only anal sex is allowed, the human race will die out from lack of reproduction. I hope no one would imply that.

[Freelanderness]

To the OP:

The only time it's ok for a man to hit a woman is if the woman has a deadly weapon or is endangering life. Otherwise, when force must be used to end a violent confrontation in said scenario, restraining her or putting her to the floor is more apropos. Throwing closed-fist punches is reserved for man-to-man.

Why wouldn't you do the same for a man? It seems to me that less people would get hurt that way.

[Germania Alliance]

Then in that case, the human race would depend on the rapists.

But wouldn't that mean that the child would be illegal?

I shudder to think.

[The Parkus Empire]

I say it's wrong to hit a girl.

If males can prove that we're still capable of chivalry, perhaps the women's rights people will quiet down and get back to making sammiches.

Not sure women enjoy being treated as helpless widdle children any more than you would.

[The Parkus Empire]

Women demand equal rights, and so they should be treated as such.

If a guy assaults me, I'll fight back. If a woman assaults me, I'll fight back. Equal rights, and not that I have anything against women, but if you want to be treated like a man then you're going to be treated like a man.

I completely agree. Don't you think women went from "we want equal rights" to "we want more priveleges"? I wouldn't be surprised if women made the rule saying it's not OK to hit a girl. But hey, I have nothing against women. I think both genders should be treated equally, and women should not be treated better than men.

Nobody likes to be hit, but the concept of women being weak, laughable shits stretches back far before the equal rights movement.

[Nova Nacio]

Only if deserved, especially in self-defense, should anyone male, female , or otherwise, does someone deserve to be hit.

Like I do. For stating the bloody obvious!

[Katonazag]

To the OP:

The only time it's ok for a man to hit a woman is if the woman has a deadly weapon or is endangering life. Otherwise, when force must be used to end a violent confrontation in said scenario, restraining her or putting her to the floor is more apropos. Throwing closed-fist punches is reserved for man-to-man.

Why?

Vaginas emit a no-fist field?

Because generally, it's an uneven match. It's not what a gentlemen does when faced with the scenario. So yes, my opinion here comes from my personal set of morals and ethics.

[The Parkus Empire]

Because generally, it's an uneven match.

I guess you don't understand: fighting, like, actual fighting, isn't a game.

[Katonazag]

To the OP:

The only time it's ok for a man to hit a woman is if the woman has a deadly weapon or is endangering life. Otherwise, when force must be used to end a violent confrontation in said scenario, restraining her or putting her to the floor is more apropos. Throwing closed-fist punches is reserved for man-to-man.

Why wouldn't you do the same for a man? It seems to me that less people would get hurt that way.

Depends if it's of a personal nature or not. I've handled plenty of people due to my job, both men and women, and those aren't personal. I've never used a closed-fist, elbow, or knee strike on any of them - in fact, I could go to jail for doing so unless they're about to overpower me.

If it's personal, I very much do intend to hurt the other man. Badly. That's not something appropriate to do to a woman, even if it's personal.

[Germania Alliance]

Because generally, it's an uneven match.

I guess you don't understand: fighting, like, actual fighting, isn't a game.

The only "uneven" match I could imagine is a man approaching an unarmed woman with a firearm, but that's already criminal and goes both ways.

If a woman came after me and hit me, I'd probably let it slip. If she repeatedly hit me, I'd hit her back, and it would escalate from there on out.

[The Parkus Empire]

Why wouldn't you do the same for a man? It seems to me that less people would get hurt that way.

Depends if it's of a personal nature or not. I've handled plenty of people due to my job, both men and women, and those aren't personal. I've never used a closed-fist, elbow, or knee strike on any of them - in fact, I could go to jail for doing so unless they're about to overpower me.

If it's personal, I very much do intend to hurt the other man. Badly. That's not something appropriate to do to a woman, even if it's personal.

So you only hurt men who have similar muscle mass and height to you?

I don't get it. If the whole point is to hurt somebody, then why the fuck do you want them to be able to resist?

[Grave_n_idle]

So only bum sex from now on?

If a law is proposed saying only anal sex is allowed, the human race will die out from lack of reproduction. I hope no one would imply that.

If they want to be treated like a man, they're going to be treated like a man. You can't stick your dick in a man's vagina, because he doesn't have one - so women who want equality can only get bum sex.

QED.

[Gilthador]

It is as OK as it is to hit a boy or anyone else. If they hit first or otherwise earned it, than yes.

[Strebedia]

Yes, its OK if they are annoying the fuck out of you with their naggy tone of voice.

[Grave_n_idle]

Why?

Vaginas emit a no-fist field?

Because generally, it's an uneven match. It's not what a gentlemen does when faced with the scenario. So yes, my opinion here comes from my personal set of morals and ethics.

A 'gentleman' doesn't go around beating on anyone, male or female - so I don't see what that has to do with it.

As for it being an uneven match, when I was walking home one day, age about 12, I got attacked by a couple of kids a couple of years older than me. I fought back, because it being an 'uneven match' seems irrelevant when someone is trying to kick you repeatedly in the face.

[The Parkus Empire]

Yes, its OK if they are annoying the fuck out of you with their naggy tone of voice.

Sean Connery?

[Verdisia]

If she hit you first, maybe, and if she clearly intends to do you harm.

If someone (male or female) just loses their cool, the wiser course is not one of retaliation.

If you need to defend yourself however, incapacitate her if possible.

[Katonazag]

Depends if it's of a personal nature or not. I've handled plenty of people due to my job, both men and women, and those aren't personal. I've never used a closed-fist, elbow, or knee strike on any of them - in fact, I could go to jail for doing so unless they're about to overpower me.

If it's personal, I very much do intend to hurt the other man. Badly. That's not something appropriate to do to a woman, even if it's personal.

So you only hurt men who have similar muscle mass and height to you?

I don't get it. If the whole point is to hurt somebody, then why the fuck do you want them to be able to resist?

No, I'm actually less physically intimidating than most. I'm just naturally more vicious, something which I have to be disciplined about and spend a lot of energy restraining. And you actually hit on the point - it depends on whether I intend to hurt them or not. If I don't intend to hurt them, and it's a physical fight, they are likely going to end up in handcuffs or medical restraints.

[The Parkus Empire]

A 'gentleman' doesn't go around beating on anyone, male or female - so I don't see what that has to do with it.

His concept of "gentlemanly" might date back to when it was okay to fistfight, or even shoot or stab, those who upset you, provided it was all done "fair". :/

[The Parkus Empire]

So you only hurt men who have similar muscle mass and height to you?

I don't get it. If the whole point is to hurt somebody, then why the fuck do you want them to be able to resist?

No, I'm actually less physically intimidating than most. I'm just naturally more vicious, something which I have to be disciplined about and spend a lot of energy restraining. And you actually hit on the point - it depends on whether I intend to hurt them or not. If I don't intend to hurt them, and it's a physical fight, they are likely going to end up in handcuffs or medical restraints.

Why is it okay to intend to hurt a man, but not a woman?