NATION

PASSWORD

Is it OK to hit a girl?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

In today's society, is it, morally speaking, still worse for a male to hit a female?

Yes
220
36%
No
289
48%
Girl fight! Girl fight! Girl fight!
96
16%
 
Total votes : 605

User avatar
Guernseyland
Envoy
 
Posts: 260
Founded: Jul 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Guernseyland » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:33 am

The Kangaroo Republic wrote:Abuse is always terrible. But sadly, even today, female on male abuse is much more accepted than male on female abuse.

The kangaroo's true (hey, that rhymes!) You shouldn't hit anyone anyway, but gender's don't matter.
Welcome to Guernseyland, The Ashkakea Area
NationStates Trainer (approval pending)
Socialist (liberal)
Animal-Guernseyland Bulldog
Currency-Decimonnaie
Motto-Exspectata ut a valde terra.
Capital-Old Guernsey City
Leader-Dr. James Smith
Religion-Protestant
Other Crap-
Economic Left/Right: -6.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.36

User avatar
New East Ireland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6215
Founded: Sep 25, 2010
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby New East Ireland » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:33 am

Fionnuala_Saoirse wrote:
Iterium wrote:No but its alot better then what happens if you stop them (i like having my hearing and nuts) and besides, if they do too much they feel "sorry" if you get my drift 8)


Your girlfriend sounds like an absolute fuckwit

I kinda like the sound of it.
"A joke is a very serious thing."

- Winston Churchill



User avatar
Fionnuala_Saoirse
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5242
Founded: Nov 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Fionnuala_Saoirse » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:33 am

It's amazing that some people need a massive rule book with every potential situation explained for them
Stupid Telegrams Received :

- "Isn't your name the name of the female Branch of the IRA" -- Benian Republic

User avatar
Rambhutan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5227
Founded: Jul 28, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rambhutan » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:33 am

Vetok wrote:It doesn't matter. Even if a frigging midget walked up and tried to 'swing' at me, (this is a colloquialism that you foreigners undoubtedly don't know) I'd still punch them. It's a matter of self defence. You can't just give someone a bloody nose if they're intent on smacking you one, you put them down and don't give them a chance to get up and try again.

And to prevent someone like you misrepresenting this as an example 'violent behaviour', this is realistic and in line with the expectation of self-defence in the UK, and undoubtedly elsewhere.


I really don't think any UK jury would decide you used reasonable force punching a midget to the ground.
Are we there yet?

Overherelandistan wrote: I chalange you to find a better one that isnt even worse

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:33 am

Siylva wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
You know for some weird reason I read that as woman. Hmm. Maybe it is too early for rum.


Aha, well I think it's sad that someone would read that and perceive a maternal tone. I would think that this is what most civilized people agree upon, that hitting anyone is wrong.


Spare the rod, spoil the child (if we are to talk about kids). I mean was spanked as a child and I turned out okay *twitches, sobs in the corner, drowns myself in alcohol*

User avatar
-St George
Senator
 
Posts: 4537
Founded: Apr 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby -St George » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:34 am

Only if she's handcuffed face down to the bed.
[19:12] <Amitabho> I mean, a little niggling voice tells me this is impossible, but then my voice of reason kicks in
[21:07] <@Milograd> I totally endorse the unfair moderation.
01:46 Goobergunch I could support StGeorge's nuts for the GOP nomination
( Anemos was here )
Also, Bonobos

User avatar
Tsarsgrad
Minister
 
Posts: 2542
Founded: Jun 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsarsgrad » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:34 am

Unilisia wrote:
Mr Bananagrabber wrote:You don't get to hit anybody unless it's in defense or you have their permission.


Pretty much this. Although to be honest, I see more girls beating guys than the other way around.


Same Here
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Yeah? Well I Am An American, and proud of it. Rawr. *waves flag* Just not always of my fellow Americans, whom I would on occasion like to beat about the head and shoulders repeatedly to try and knock out the stupid. >_>
Inquisitor of the NS Ōrdō Logicae- Fighting against fallacies and ignorance.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
-Theodore Roosevelt
And on the pedestal these words appear: I am Ozymandias, king of kings, ye who are mighty, look upon my works, and despair.
@}-;-'---

User avatar
Iterium
Diplomat
 
Posts: 683
Founded: Jun 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Iterium » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:34 am

Fionnuala_Saoirse wrote:
Iterium wrote:No but its alot better then what happens if you stop them (i like having my hearing and nuts) and besides, if they do too much they feel "sorry" if you get my drift 8)


Your girlfriend sounds like an absolute fuckwit

Not in a relationship atm thx to my ex-girlfriend's friend.

I hate her timing, i really really do :evil:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Iterium wrote:lemme guess, they tried to teach you that it isnt sanitary to beat your neighbor with a raw chicken.

i never got that rule personally.


You're meant to beat them with a whisk, silly. Till they're soft, fluffy and they've stopped twitching.

User avatar
Siylva
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: Feb 26, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Siylva » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:34 am

Katganistan wrote:
Siylva wrote:
Did any of you try threatening to take away something she held dear? Or providing a positive incentive for her if she stopped hitting people.

Its just, I've never been around a child so unruly that she could break her parent's nose and I can't really imagine a child that isn't more or less easily cajoled by their parents at that age.

Just because you can't imagine it does not mean it doesn't exist. And yes, she had things taken away, and it was explained, so please, don't try to move the goalposts again.


Relax a bit?

I only said I couldn't imagine it, I didn't mean to imply that i didn't believe it happened.

It's a statement of the difficulty of my trying to comprehend something outside of my experience, not me saying "Oh, well, I kind of find it hard to believe this happened."

No goalpost moved, not everything is contention.

User avatar
New East Ireland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6215
Founded: Sep 25, 2010
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby New East Ireland » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:35 am

-St George wrote:Only if she's handcuffed face down to the bed.

Damn straight.
"A joke is a very serious thing."

- Winston Churchill



User avatar
Andonam
Diplomat
 
Posts: 932
Founded: May 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Andonam » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:36 am

If you choose to slap me, then I can choose to slap you. I don't give a rip of what gender you are except for when it comes to choice of dates, sports teams, and what bathroom you should be in.
THIS IS PERSIA!

I do not personally share the veiws expressed by my nation. In reality, I am a Masculinsit, not a Chauvist. Andonam is created to act as a satire of modern feminist "theory". If you slap me, I maintain the right to slap you back;deal with it.

Masulinist, Atheist, Pro-Government.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:36 am

-St George wrote:Only if she's handcuffed face down to the bed.


Now, now, George. We don't want to hear about your rape fantasies.

User avatar
Hakkalakkazakka
Attaché
 
Posts: 81
Founded: Jul 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakkalakkazakka » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:36 am

Even in self defence I wouldn't hit a girl, a male is another story, I'll just hold her tight and hug her.
Triggerwarning: This white cis male is prone to misogyny.
My posts can/always include sarcasm, irony, nostalgia to the old NS community and simple hard non biased truth.
"Son, I have one thing to tell - Don't you f***ing dare go anywhere near my car again, you son-of-a-bitch." -Octabrinaland

User avatar
Rhodmhire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17421
Founded: Jun 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodmhire » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:36 am

Where does she land on the scale?

What? It's a good measuring tool for these things.

It's okay to hit anybody if you are in a situation in which you can judge that any alternative to violence will not work. I am personally the type of guy who would take a few blows before striking myself, being a recessive and pacifist. That part of me only budges in the other direction when I understand that keeping it constant will get me seriously wounded or possibly killed.

And I don't care if my opponent has a vagina, if it comes to that.
Part of me grew up here. But part of growing up is leaving parts of ourselves behind.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163861
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:37 am

I've long maintained that it is perfectly acceptable to hit a woman in any situation where it would be acceptable to hit a man. Simple, no?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 36918
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:38 am

Iterium wrote:
Katganistan wrote:Then honestly, if you put up with it, you're literally telling her it's ok.

She is going to do it anyway, wheather its then or 10 times worse tommorrow. And i rather like being around my girlfriend and not having to watch my back.


Then what do you need her for? Dump her abusive ass for someone who treats you with respect.

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:39 am

The King of Democracy wrote:
Astrolinium wrote:So, unless you've been living under a rock for the past I-don't-know-how-many years, you may have noticed recently that women have been moving away from the sandwich-making counter of the kitchen and into the equal rights room. But that's not exactly what we're here to talk about. No, today I'd like to ask NSG's thoughts on a related issue.
In today's society, is it, morally speaking, still worse for a male to hit a female than for a male to hit a male, a female to hit a male, or a female to hit a female?

I think that it's not. While I think hitting anyone is usually morally wrong, the gender of the person being hit and the gender of the person doing the hitting shouldn't factor in at all. We live in a society where a woman can do (in theory, at least) whatever she puts her mind to, just like a man. If you want equality, you have to take all or nothing, and that means you don't get a pedestal where you're shielded from the negative consequences of your actions. If male-on-female violence is more reprehensible than other combinations of gender and violence, then women might as well grab the loaf of bread and get back in the kitchen, because they clearly don't really want equal equal rights and treatment.

But what do you think, NSG?


Disclaimer: I do not advocate going out into your kitchen and brutally assaulting with a fish the nearest woman who refuses to make you a sammich, regardless of the suspiciousness of putting this disclaimer here when I mentioned no such action in the main body of my post.


Are you seriously bringing this up? Nobody should hit each other plain and simple. Forget about morals people just do what is right try avoiding violence as much as you can.

I'm not sure if I should laugh or facepalm.
There is this thing in everyone’s head that makes them know what is right and what is wrong use it and the world will be a better place.

Yeah... no.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
-St George
Senator
 
Posts: 4537
Founded: Apr 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby -St George » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:40 am

Mike the Progressive wrote:
-St George wrote:Only if she's handcuffed face down to the bed.


Now, now, George. We don't want to hear about your rape fantasies.

Fantasies? :eyebrow:
[19:12] <Amitabho> I mean, a little niggling voice tells me this is impossible, but then my voice of reason kicks in
[21:07] <@Milograd> I totally endorse the unfair moderation.
01:46 Goobergunch I could support StGeorge's nuts for the GOP nomination
( Anemos was here )
Also, Bonobos

User avatar
Iterium
Diplomat
 
Posts: 683
Founded: Jun 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Iterium » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:40 am

Katganistan wrote:
Iterium wrote:She is going to do it anyway, wheather its then or 10 times worse tommorrow. And i rather like being around my girlfriend and not having to watch my back.


Then what do you need her for? Dump her abusive ass for someone who treats you with respect.

You've obviously never ticked your girlfriend off bad enough that she wants to hurt you, gotta respect ya for that.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Iterium wrote:lemme guess, they tried to teach you that it isnt sanitary to beat your neighbor with a raw chicken.

i never got that rule personally.


You're meant to beat them with a whisk, silly. Till they're soft, fluffy and they've stopped twitching.

User avatar
Iterium
Diplomat
 
Posts: 683
Founded: Jun 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Iterium » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:41 am

Katganistan wrote:
Iterium wrote:She is going to do it anyway, wheather its then or 10 times worse tommorrow. And i rather like being around my girlfriend and not having to watch my back.


Then what do you need her for? Dump her abusive ass for someone who treats you with respect.

And ps, we already broke up.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Iterium wrote:lemme guess, they tried to teach you that it isnt sanitary to beat your neighbor with a raw chicken.

i never got that rule personally.


You're meant to beat them with a whisk, silly. Till they're soft, fluffy and they've stopped twitching.

User avatar
Fionnuala_Saoirse
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5242
Founded: Nov 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Fionnuala_Saoirse » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:41 am

-St George wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Now, now, George. We don't want to hear about your rape fantasies.

Fantasies? :eyebrow:


Well you can't actually rape her if she's your girlfriend after all
Stupid Telegrams Received :

- "Isn't your name the name of the female Branch of the IRA" -- Benian Republic

User avatar
-St George
Senator
 
Posts: 4537
Founded: Apr 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby -St George » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:42 am

Fionnuala_Saoirse wrote:
-St George wrote:Fantasies? :eyebrow:


Well you can't actually rape her if she's your girlfriend after all

Damn you.
[19:12] <Amitabho> I mean, a little niggling voice tells me this is impossible, but then my voice of reason kicks in
[21:07] <@Milograd> I totally endorse the unfair moderation.
01:46 Goobergunch I could support StGeorge's nuts for the GOP nomination
( Anemos was here )
Also, Bonobos

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163861
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:42 am

Katganistan wrote:
Iterium wrote:She is going to do it anyway, wheather its then or 10 times worse tommorrow. And i rather like being around my girlfriend and not having to watch my back.


Then what do you need her for? Dump her abusive ass for someone who treats you with respect.

And consider criminal charges. *nods*
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Malgrave
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5738
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malgrave » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:42 am

Goldsaver wrote:Hitting someone in general is morally wrong, unless of course it is in self defense or defending another; I don't believe gender should be a factor in it.


This.
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

United Kingdom of Malgrave (1910-)
Population: 331 million
GDP Per Capita: 42,000 dollars
Join the Leftist Cooperation and Security Pact

User avatar
The King of Democracy
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 19
Founded: Mar 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The King of Democracy » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:42 am

Katganistan wrote:
The King of Democracy wrote:Mabie, but mabie you did'nt understand what I was meaning. I ment that you souldn't be constantly letting what we call morals taunt you into doing what other people will think is a good deed. Automaticly do the right thing not what others think is right but what you know is right. Being moraly correct isn't always right. Just do the right thing.


You keep using that word....I do not think it means what you THINK it means.

I know what moral means. Here is a quote from one of your references: "of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical: moral attitudes"- dictonary.com
Just because something is ethical, right to other people does not justify it being wrong or right. You can choose to belive if something is right or wrong by yourself. Morals are something that were made by the human race that are considered right or wrong. For instance religious morals, Spiritual morals. They were all made by other people to help you make the right decision but the thoughts of others is irrelevant to what you should do or think and it should be left up to that person. Some people even have their own moral guide lines but it still dosn't make it right to live by them all the time. Each new decision that you have to make needs to be looked at at all different angles and should be influenced by other people, set codes of conduct for yourself.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Jerzylvania, Neanderthaland, Pale Dawn, Plan Neonie, Port Carverton, Shrillland, Tiami

Advertisement

Remove ads