Conservapedia

by **Farnhamia** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 6:58 pm

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:
Moon Cows wrote:Hey. Now there's a balance. Right-wing extremists (conservapedia) and left-wing extremists (wikipedia). Both consist of false information and both are written in biased POVs.

Is there a surgery that can remove one's head from one's colon after they've planted it so firmly there?

Yes, but no insurance plan covers it.

by **Unhealthy2** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:02 pm

Farnhamia wrote:Yes, but no insurance plan covers it.

That's because it's too experimental. It involves showing people Glenn Beck clips, followed by a response from someone who isn't mentally ill. The juxtaposition of extreme insanity and extreme sanity leads to an outcome where about 25% of patients leave with their heads removed, 25% leave with their heads jammed in even further, and the other 50% find a way to stab themselves to death with the remote for the TV just so they don't have to deal with the pain anymore.

It's just too risky and too experimental to bother funding.

by **Mosasauria** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:18 pm

This always cracks me up.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism#At ... nd_obesity

by **Yuktova** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 9:12 pm

Mosasauria wrote:This always cracks me up.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism#At ... nd_obesity

It's actually the reverse. The more relgious you are, the more likely your gonna be fat.

by **Mosasauria** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 9:19 pm

Yuktova wrote:
Mosasauria wrote:This always cracks me up.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism#At ... nd_obesity

It's actually the reverse. The more relgious you are, the more likely your gonna be fat.

I know. How many fat church-goers can you find?

by **Yuktova** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 9:20 pm

Mosasauria wrote:
Yuktova wrote:It's actually the reverse. The more relgious you are, the more likely your gonna be fat.

I know. How many fat church-goers can you find?

A lot more then you'd like to believe, that's for sure. Hey, at least they have "faith" that the Lord can pray the fat away.

by **Mosasauria** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 9:23 pm

Yuktova wrote:
Mosasauria wrote:I know. How many fat church-goers can you find?

A lot more then you'd like to believe, that's for sure. Hey, at least they have "faith" that the Lord can pray the fat away.

Or the extreme excersise of walking from the parking lot to the chapel.

by **-West** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 7:42 am

Conservapedia is Bleh.

by **Gauthier** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:18 am

Conservapedia: If FOXNews set up a wiki

by **Litresha** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:26 am

What's sad is that I'm sure that in some point in time conservatives actually had some valid points. Nowadays, however, I don't even see how they can say these things that they say with a straight face. :meh:

by **Yuktova** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:30 am

Litresha wrote:What's sad is that I'm sure that in some point in time conservatives actually had some valid points. Nowadays, however, I don't even see how they can say these things that they say with a straight face.

To be honest, I am not sure either. They have to be andriods in order for them to say the crap they say on TV.

by **Farnhamia** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:44 am

Yuktova wrote:
Litresha wrote:What's sad is that I'm sure that in some point in time conservatives actually had some valid points. Nowadays, however, I don't even see how they can say these things that they say with a straight face.

To be honest, I am not sure either. They have to be andriods in order for them to say the crap they say on TV.

This is why I stopped watching the Sunday morning interview shows. It was the parade of conservative talking heads, week after week, lying through their damned teeth.

by **Yuktova** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:11 am

I detect that the creator of Conservapedia is a giant wanna be troll...

by **Herrebrugh** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:19 am

Yuktova wrote:I detect that the creator of Conservapedia is a giant wanna be troll...

Already knew it. Already loved it.

by **Trulliana** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:51 am

This is disgusting... They're suggesting liberals set up anders behring breivik to appear christian and conservative on his facebook page as a plot to smear conservatism

by **Wikkiwallana** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:57 am

Trulliana wrote:This is disgusting... They're suggesting liberals set up anders behring breivik to appear christian and conservative on his facebook page as a plot to smear conservatism

Welcome to their world, where if reality disagrees with ideology, it must be a liberal plot.

by **Soviet Haaregrad** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:59 am

Trulliana wrote:This is disgusting... They're suggesting liberals set up anders behring breivik to appear christian and conservative on his facebook page as a plot to smear conservatism

Because conservatives are never evil. If they appear to be it's because the perp wasn't conservative and liberals are being dishonest liars to present them as such or because the act wasn't evil and liberal media bias has distorted your opinion of the act.

by **Trulliana** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:03 am

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:
Trulliana wrote:This is disgusting... They're suggesting liberals set up anders behring breivik to appear christian and conservative on his facebook page as a plot to smear conservatism

Because conservatives are never evil. If they appear to be it's because the perp wasn't conservative and liberals are being dishonest liars to present them as such or because the act wasn't evil and liberal media bias has distorted your opinion of the act.

I don't know what it was about this, but it just sickened me. The rest of their bullshit I can laugh about as it's inflated right-wing pap and hard to take seriously, but the fact that they can take a tragedy like this and manipulate it is just disgusting

by **Soviet Haaregrad** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:05 am

Trulliana wrote:
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:
Because conservatives are never evil. If they appear to be it's because the perp wasn't conservative and liberals are being dishonest liars to present them as such or because the act wasn't evil and liberal media bias has distorted your opinion of the act.

I don't know what it was about this, but it just sickened me. The rest of their bullshit I can laugh about as it's inflated right-wing pap and hard to take seriously, but the fact that they can take a tragedy like this and manipulate it is just disgusting

I guess you forget what they've been like since 9/11.

by **Trulliana** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:11 am

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:
Trulliana wrote:
I don't know what it was about this, but it just sickened me. The rest of their bullshit I can laugh about as it's inflated right-wing pap and hard to take seriously, but the fact that they can take a tragedy like this and manipulate it is just disgusting

I guess you forget what they've been like since 9/11.

Well, I'm British so (thankfully) I don't run into American conservatism much, and I only recently discovered Conservapedia. So this kind of took me by surprise somewhat

by **Soviet Haaregrad** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:15 am

Trulliana wrote:
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:
I guess you forget what they've been like since 9/11.

Well, I'm British so (thankfully) I don't run into American conservatism much, and I only recently discovered Conservapedia. So this kind of took me surprise somewhat

You and sane people everywhere.

by **Aeronos** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 3:19 am

As a RationalWiki contributor, Conservapedia is like alcohol. It makes you laugh a lot, but burns off your brain cells

Conservapedia

Who is online