
by Unhealthy2 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:35 am

by Unhealthy2 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:36 am

by The Wild Northwest » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:39 am
Unhealthy2 wrote:http://conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity
My god, look at number 12.
Should I laugh, or should I cry?
Shanix wrote:Jesus: "Moses, have you seen my shaver?"
Moses without beard: "Uhm...Uh..."
Jesus: "Moses, quit Stalin' and tell me where it is."
Stalin, poking his head into the scene: "You called Comrade?"
Jesus: "False alarm Stalin, get back to oppression, I'll speak with you when I shaved."
by Alyakia » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:41 am

by Unhealthy2 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:41 am
The Wild Northwest wrote:I think the website was made entirely for joking, though. I hope...

by Soviet Haaregrad » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:42 am

by Wikkiwallana » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:45 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Episarta » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:46 am



by Soviet Haaregrad » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:48 am
Episarta wrote:This site is just horrible, awful, and terribly stupid. I find it amazing that they actually believe the stuff written on there.

by Unhealthy2 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:49 am
Meowfoundland wrote:I love the 'Atheism and' series.

by Unhealthy2 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:50 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Just remember, that's who controls the Republican party.

by Natty Narwhal » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:51 am

by The USOT » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:53 am

by Meowfoundland » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:00 am
Unhealthy2 wrote:Meowfoundland wrote:I love the 'Atheism and' series.
What about the "Homosexuality and" series?
It's out of date but, lulz.

by Episarta » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:02 am

by Soviet Haaregrad » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:10 am
The nature and rules of soccer very much resemble socialism in many ways:
The "off-sides" rule prohibits using certain aggressive ("unfair") tactics in the game.
Soccer is very bureaucratic, and teams are very much tied to their countries.
The US is often treated unfairly by other nations in the game, one reason being soccer's lack of popularity in the US - socialism always claimed to favor the absolute will of the majority rather than personal and economic freedom of the individual.
The World Cup trophy resembles socialist Hollywood's Emmy Award.
In youth leagues, everyone gets a trophy for their efforts regardless of achievement, and there is no scoring in the game.
Even the World Cup encourages "achievement" by holding a third-place game for the two losers in the semifinals.
Union strikes, even during the playing season, are a major issue with soccer.
Riots caused by "hooligans" - fans of a team which lost a game - often include violent crimes, such as infringement on private property rights.
Participants are known to behave dishonestly and illegally and act against the interests of their team in order to gain financially themselves.
Soccer coaches only need a vocabulary of about 100 words to coach their teams, which is reminiscent of socialist pandering to the lowest common denominator. At least twice as many conservative words alone originated in the 20th century.


by Natty Narwhal » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:11 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:The nature and rules of soccer very much resemble socialism in many ways:
The "off-sides" rule prohibits using certain aggressive ("unfair") tactics in the game.
Soccer is very bureaucratic, and teams are very much tied to their countries.
The US is often treated unfairly by other nations in the game, one reason being soccer's lack of popularity in the US - socialism always claimed to favor the absolute will of the majority rather than personal and economic freedom of the individual.
The World Cup trophy resembles socialist Hollywood's Emmy Award.
In youth leagues, everyone gets a trophy for their efforts regardless of achievement, and there is no scoring in the game.
Even the World Cup encourages "achievement" by holding a third-place game for the two losers in the semifinals.
Union strikes, even during the playing season, are a major issue with soccer.
Riots caused by "hooligans" - fans of a team which lost a game - often include violent crimes, such as infringement on private property rights.
Participants are known to behave dishonestly and illegally and act against the interests of their team in order to gain financially themselves.
Soccer coaches only need a vocabulary of about 100 words to coach their teams, which is reminiscent of socialist pandering to the lowest common denominator. At least twice as many conservative words alone originated in the 20th century.
Not sure if srs.

by Soviet Haaregrad » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:12 am


by Natty Narwhal » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:13 am

by The Archregimancy » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:14 am
Natty Narwhal wrote:Just to add a few more absurdities. <snip> and Soccer and Socialism

by Christmahanikwanzikah » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:14 am

by Soviet Haaregrad » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:17 am
Even the World Cup encourages "achievement" by holding a third-place game for the two losers in the semifinals.

by Soviet Haaregrad » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:23 am
JJ Place wrote:I like Conservapedia; it's one of the best comedy sites that I can find.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Candesia, Emotional Support Crocodile, Neo-American States, Vassenor, Vyahrapura
Advertisement