Strength of Atheism

[Ferrond]

Actually I did, but you don't seem to accept it, even though you yourself yielded to my argument.

no, you didn't. Even with your apparent omniscience(which you would need to have in order to disprove God, while a bunch of Hebrews proved it to themselves in ~4000 BC), you did not prove to me that God does not exist. May you burn in the lake of burning sulfur when Jesus comes again.

A bunch of ignorant, smelly, primitive, goat herders only proved they can con both themselves and the rest of the world.

[Norstal]

I'll come back to you a year from now, and that's only if I become magically good at math(Never have been).

You're not the one trying to lecture a college graduate with a dual degree in physics and mathematics by using high school math.

One of these days, I'll make you slip up on simple things like 40+20*0+1=?

[Mosasauria]

I'll come back to you a year from now, and that's only if I become magically good at math(Never have been).

You're not the one trying to lecture a college graduate with a dual degree in physics and mathematics by using high school math.

Which I barely understand regardless...
I've only been good at geometry(Big shocker there)...

[Unhealthy2]

No, in binary 1+1=10. I speak of the infinite.

I was not referring to binary representation, I was referring to the field of binaries.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra

[Mosasauria]

You're not the one trying to lecture a college graduate with a dual degree in physics and mathematics by using high school math.

One of these days, I'll make you slip up on simple things like 40+20*0+1=?

Tell me what that asterisk means and maybe I might even be able to solve it.

[Norstal]

Actually I did, but you don't seem to accept it, even though you yourself yielded to my argument.

no, you didn't. Even with your apparent omniscience(which you would need to have in order to disprove God, while a bunch of Hebrews proved it to themselves in ~4000 BC),

Occam's Razor.

you did not prove to me that God does not exist. May you burn in the lake of burning sulfur when Jesus comes again.

Ironic, but I did proved to you it wasn't god who made the universe, which means god doesn't do anything and hence, god doesn't exist.

[Mosasauria]

Actually I did, but you don't seem to accept it, even though you yourself yielded to my argument.

no, you didn't. Even with your apparent omniscience(which you would need to have in order to disprove God, while a bunch of Hebrews proved it to themselves in ~4000 BC), you did not prove to me that God does not exist. May you burn in the lake of burning sulfur when Jesus comes again.

I thought Jesus taught his followers to be loving and tolerant?

[Norstal]

One of these days, I'll make you slip up on simple things like 40+20*0+1=?

Tell me what that asterisk means and maybe I might even be able to solve it.

Multiplication.

[Mosasauria]

Tell me what that asterisk means and maybe I might even be able to solve it.

Multiplication.

So the equation just equals 41?

[Niene]

One of these days, I'll make you slip up on simple things like 40+20*0+1=?

Tell me what that asterisk means and maybe I might even be able to solve it.

Multiplied by.

[Norstal]

no, you didn't. Even with your apparent omniscience(which you would need to have in order to disprove God, while a bunch of Hebrews proved it to themselves in ~4000 BC), you did not prove to me that God does not exist. May you burn in the lake of burning sulfur when Jesus comes again.

I thought Jesus taught his followers to be loving and tolerant?

He already lied. Might as well sin even more amirite.

[Niene]

Multiplication.

So the equation just equals 41?

I got that answer too.

[Drachmar]

All right, so in the technicalities there are no agnostics. But there's still a difference between not believing in god and believing he may or may not exist, and that it can't be proven.

Yes, and that difference has always historically been strong and weak atheism.
using agnosticism in place of weak atheism as a label has emerged from the fear of being persecuted, or the individuals being unwilling to label themselves atheists due to stigma.
Its cowardice, plain and simple.

No, it's not cowardice. Who are you to judge whether or not someone's belief structure is valid? It works for the individual. Judge lest ye not be judged. Give me a break. While I personally may not agree with an agnostic (whether or not God exists), that is their decision. I honestly can find validity in either argument (theist, or atheist).

[Ferrond]

no, you didn't. Even with your apparent omniscience(which you would need to have in order to disprove God, while a bunch of Hebrews proved it to themselves in ~4000 BC), you did not prove to me that God does not exist. May you burn in the lake of burning sulfur when Jesus comes again.

I thought Jesus taught his followers to be loving and tolerant?

Among other contradictory things, I'd love to nail his ass on the cross myself.

[Norstal]

Multiplication.

So the equation just equals 41?

You just outsmarted about 1 million people who got the answer wrong. So congrats. But don't tell UH that!

[Unhealthy2]

Which I barely understand regardless...
I've only been good at geometry(Big shocker there)...

It's not to sound cocky, but I do know my stuff when it comes to mathematics, physics, and certain, restricted areas of philosophy, and it annoys me to be talked down to by someone who knows less about my field than I do.

You want to "school" me on biology, or organic chemistry, or history, or literary analysis? Go right ahead. You want to school me on mathematics? No, not unless you really know your shit.

[Izandai]

No, in binary 1+1=10. I speak of the infinite.

I was not referring to binary representation, I was referring to the field of binaries.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra

Oh. Well I haven't learned that. But anyways I was thinking of something different.

[Ostroeuropa]

Yes, and that difference has always historically been strong and weak atheism.
using agnosticism in place of weak atheism as a label has emerged from the fear of being persecuted, or the individuals being unwilling to label themselves atheists due to stigma.
Its cowardice, plain and simple.

No, it's not cowardice. Who are you to judge whether or not someone's belief structure is valid? It works for the individual. Judge lest ye not be judged. Give me a break. While I personally may not agree with an agnostic (whether or not God exists), that is their decision. I honestly can find validity in either argument (theist, or atheist).

I'm not saying the belief is cowardice.
I'm saying them calling their belief agnostic is.
If you'd bothered to read my post you would realize that.

[Mosasauria]

I thought Jesus taught his followers to be loving and tolerant?

He already lied. Might as well sin even more amirite.

It's odd. I'm an atheist(Not an anti-theist mind you), and I'm a much more tolerant and loving person than many so-called Christians are. I don't tell people to rot in a fiery hole of sin, I tell them to leave me alone and walk away.
So I also "Turn the other cheek".
Funny, I'm more Christian than many Christians.

[Mosasauria]

Which I barely understand regardless...
I've only been good at geometry(Big shocker there)...

It's not to sound cocky, but I do know my stuff when it comes to mathematics, physics, and certain, restricted areas of philosophy, and it annoys me to be talked down to by someone who knows less about my field than I do.

You want to "school" me on biology, or organic chemistry, or history, or literary analysis? Go right ahead. You want to school me on mathematics? No, not unless you really know your shit.

Now those are some of my specialties.
But I do understand where you're coming from.
I remembered how pissed I got when a person tried to lecture everyone at my school(Falsely) about why there was a mass stranding of Man-O-Wars.
Predictably, it involved god.

[Barrasso]

Catholic

[Ostroeuropa]

He already lied. Might as well sin even more amirite.

It's odd. I'm an atheist(Not an anti-theist mind you), and I'm a much more tolerant and loving person than many so-called Christians are. I don't tell people to rot in a fiery hole of sin, I tell them to leave me alone and walk away.
So I also "Turn the other cheek".
Funny, I'm more Christian than many Christians.

You mean Paulists.
None of these christians are dead in a desert.
Give up all your possessions, worry not for the morrow, and go stand in the desert with jesus.
No?
THEN ITS HELLFIRE FOR YOU!
read your goddamn bible

[Unhealthy2]

Oh. Well I haven't learned that. But anyways I was thinking of something different.

Nonetheless, everyone knows that the real truth is that 1 + 1 = 69.

[Niene]

He already lied. Might as well sin even more amirite.

It's odd. I'm an atheist(Not an anti-theist mind you), and I'm a much more tolerant and loving person than many so-called Christians are. I don't tell people to rot in a fiery hole of sin, I tell them to leave me alone and walk away.
So I also "Turn the other cheek".
Funny, I'm more Christian than many Christians.

Nobody said being a 'Christian' in name made you a nice person. If only.

[Niene]

Nonetheless, everyone knows that the real truth is that 1 + 1 = 69.

I'm sigging that too.
More funny statements, people!