NATION

PASSWORD

Gun Rights

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which do you like?

Conceal Carry
151
15%
Open Carry
85
9%
Both open and conceal carry
422
42%
Keep guns in the house
153
15%
Ban guns
182
18%
 
Total votes : 993

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:07 am

Calldar wrote:
Lessnt wrote:Simple simple.
You cannot stop mentally ill people from hiding mental illness.
SO>>>>>>> there have been mentally ill people who served in the militia.military.national guard.


And they are then discharged when their illnesses are discovered. That's if they even made it through medical without it getting noticed.

Does not change the fact that it happens and it will continue to happen.

User avatar
Calldar
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Calldar » Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:14 am

Lessnt wrote:
Calldar wrote:
And they are then discharged when their illnesses are discovered. That's if they even made it through medical without it getting noticed.

Does not change the fact that it happens and it will continue to happen.


In case you haven't noticed kid, the military tries to stop that from happening as much as possible.
Pro-USA, Pro-Capitalism, Pro-Military, Pro-Globalization, Pro-Secularism Anti-Fascism, Anti-Racism, Anti-Communism, Anti-Nationalism

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.23
"In 1950 I wasn't pro-war, I was just anti-communist and pro-America. Then about 2 years into the war we were just north of Seoul, there was this pretty little village with all these pretty girls....we got ordered to pull back, and The Reds took the village. Calling me pro-war after that would have been an understatement." - Grandpa on the Korean War.

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:18 am

Calldar wrote:
Lessnt wrote:Does not change the fact that it happens and it will continue to happen.


In case you haven't noticed kid, the military tries to stop that from happening as much as possible.

And it is hopeless.
So in my opinion the mentally ill has done as much as anyone to deserve their rights.

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9948
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:44 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Legally owned automatic weapons are almost never used in crimes (the kind of people that can afford to purchase transferable select fire/full auto weapons aren't the kind of people that use them to commit crimes). IMO, there's no reason for them to be banned.

Automatic weapons are tricky, while they can be fun to use recreationally they aren't practical for self defense and can be terrifying liabilities in the wrong hands. People should have access but it shouldn't be easy.


As of right now, it isn't easy. It requires a paperwork signoff from the CLEO in your town/city/county/state (unless you have an NFA trust already set up), as well as a tax stamp from ATF. Even then, you're limited to full auto/select fire weapons manufactured and registered before May 19, 1986 (which is why the price for one is so high, because supply is so much lower than demand).
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9948
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:06 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Lessnt wrote:birdshot often wounds not kills.


Tell that to the guy Dick Cheney blew away.
Lessnt wrote:grain is a measurement.
But in a bullet what is it measuring?
How does this measurement relate to bullets and guns?

It's a unit of measurement, it usually refers to the bullet but is also used to measure the slug the powder or just about anything else because that's how measurement works.


The guy that Dick Cheney "blew away" is Harry Whittington, who survived the incident. Of course, that example is more the exception than the rule.
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Andaluciae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5766
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Andaluciae » Sat Sep 24, 2011 5:21 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Andaluciae wrote:

My High-Standard .22 lr pistol is most certainly not a weapon of death.


The mob used to love those things because they do a hell of a job liquifeying a human brain.


Which is exactly why they would down over a thousand dollars on a precision machined, Olympic competition pistol with a long barrel, and great weight. You can certainly kill with a .22 target pistol, but it doesn't make any sense, economically or capabilities-wise to try. They're designed to be used by sporting competitors. I certainly don't plan on shooting anything other than little pieces of paper. Just like baseball bats, golf clubs and fencing sabers.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:28 am

Gun Manufacturers wrote:As of right now, it isn't easy. It requires a paperwork signoff from the CLEO in your town/city/county/state (unless you have an NFA trust already set up), as well as a tax stamp from ATF. Even then, you're limited to full auto/select fire weapons manufactured and registered before May 19, 1986 (which is why the price for one is so high, because supply is so much lower than demand).

And that's a good system.
Andaluciae wrote:Which is exactly why they would down over a thousand dollars on a precision machined, Olympic competition pistol with a long barrel, and great weight. You can certainly kill with a .22 target pistol, but it doesn't make any sense, economically or capabilities-wise to try. They're designed to be used by sporting competitors. I certainly don't plan on shooting anything other than little pieces of paper. Just like baseball bats, golf clubs and fencing sabers.


Try about 300 dollars. Criminals aren't often concerned with accuracy or even stopping power as much as they are about clip size and concealability. To quote Sonny Corleone "Whataya think this is, the Army, where you shoot 'em a mile away? You gotta get up close like this... badaBING! you blow their brains all over your nice Ivy League suit" The fact that a 22 round often won't be able to exit the body often results in serious wounds that aren't easy to quickly treat.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
William Delaney III
Envoy
 
Posts: 311
Founded: Sep 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby William Delaney III » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:32 am

Frankly, I would ban guns just to annoy the NRA nuts I've known. They annoy me.

Otherwise, I'm a little bit skeptical of the ability of gun control laws to reduce violent crime, and I only tend to err, grudgingly, on the side of thinking it might work because the more credible scientific sources tend to think it would be a good idea.

User avatar
Novaya Tselinoyarsk
Senator
 
Posts: 4091
Founded: Aug 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Novaya Tselinoyarsk » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:39 am

William Delaney III wrote:Otherwise, I'm a little bit skeptical of the ability of gun control laws to reduce violent crime, and I only tend to err, grudgingly, on the side of thinking it might work because the more credible scientific sources tend to think it would be a good idea.


And for a long ass period of time most people thought the Earth was flat, doesn't mean it was right.
Proletariacka Rzeczpospolita Nowy Tselinoyarsk
Proletarskaya Respubliki Novaya Tselinoyarsk

User avatar
Andaluciae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5766
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Andaluciae » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:40 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Gun Manufacturers wrote:As of right now, it isn't easy. It requires a paperwork signoff from the CLEO in your town/city/county/state (unless you have an NFA trust already set up), as well as a tax stamp from ATF. Even then, you're limited to full auto/select fire weapons manufactured and registered before May 19, 1986 (which is why the price for one is so high, because supply is so much lower than demand).

And that's a good system.
Andaluciae wrote:Which is exactly why they would down over a thousand dollars on a precision machined, Olympic competition pistol with a long barrel, and great weight. You can certainly kill with a .22 target pistol, but it doesn't make any sense, economically or capabilities-wise to try. They're designed to be used by sporting competitors. I certainly don't plan on shooting anything other than little pieces of paper. Just like baseball bats, golf clubs and fencing sabers.


Try about 300 dollars. Criminals aren't often concerned with accuracy or even stopping power as much as they are about clip size and concealability. To quote Sonny Corleone "Whataya think this is, the Army, where you shoot 'em a mile away? You gotta get up close like this... badaBING! you blow their brains all over your nice Ivy League suit" The fact that a 22 round often won't be able to exit the body often results in serious wounds that aren't easy to quickly treat.

I feel like you missed the part where I said i was describing my gun. High-Standard .22, Olympic Target pistol. Not a Saturday night special.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

User avatar
The Soviet Technocracy
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6371
Founded: Dec 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Soviet Technocracy » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:46 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Gun Manufacturers wrote:As of right now, it isn't easy. It requires a paperwork signoff from the CLEO in your town/city/county/state (unless you have an NFA trust already set up), as well as a tax stamp from ATF. Even then, you're limited to full auto/select fire weapons manufactured and registered before May 19, 1986 (which is why the price for one is so high, because supply is so much lower than demand).

And that's a good system.
Andaluciae wrote:Which is exactly why they would down over a thousand dollars on a precision machined, Olympic competition pistol with a long barrel, and great weight. You can certainly kill with a .22 target pistol, but it doesn't make any sense, economically or capabilities-wise to try. They're designed to be used by sporting competitors. I certainly don't plan on shooting anything other than little pieces of paper. Just like baseball bats, golf clubs and fencing sabers.


Try about 300 dollars. Criminals aren't often concerned with accuracy or even stopping power as much as they are about clip size and concealability. To quote Sonny Corleone "Whataya think this is, the Army, where you shoot 'em a mile away? You gotta get up close like this... badaBING! you blow their brains all over your nice Ivy League suit" The fact that a 22 round often won't be able to exit the body often results in serious wounds that aren't easy to quickly treat.


A High Standard .22 target pistol is not $300.

$300 is a bit expensive for the mob anyways. They'll go after <$100 Raven Arms and Jiminez .25 ACPs.

Novaya Tselinoyarsk wrote:
William Delaney III wrote:Otherwise, I'm a little bit skeptical of the ability of gun control laws to reduce violent crime, and I only tend to err, grudgingly, on the side of thinking it might work because the more credible scientific sources tend to think it would be a good idea.


And for a long ass period of time most people thought the Earth was flat, doesn't mean it was right.


1) No one sane thought the Earth was flat for any significant period of time.

Even Columbus was saw as a loon because he thought the Earth was half the size everyone else thought it was.

2) The "more credible" sources say that gun control is utter bollocks. The only ones that agree with it are the political spindoctoring ones.
Last edited by The Soviet Technocracy on Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
New Nicksyllvania - Unjustly Deleted 4/2/11
I love Rebecca Black

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:47 am

Andaluciae wrote:I feel like you missed the part where I said i was describing my gun. High-Standard .22, Olympic Target pistol. Not a Saturday night special.


I'm not sure if your suggesting the mob won't kill someone without your gun or that your gun is incapable of killing someone either way I disagree. You can pick up a 22 caliber pistol for about three hundred bucks probably for less if your not going through legal channels.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Novaya Tselinoyarsk
Senator
 
Posts: 4091
Founded: Aug 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Novaya Tselinoyarsk » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:49 am

The Soviet Technocracy wrote:
Novaya Tselinoyarsk wrote:
And for a long ass period of time most people thought the Earth was flat, doesn't mean it was right.


1) No one sane thought the Earth was flat for any significant period of time.

Even Columbus was saw as a loon because he thought the Earth was half the size everyone else thought it was.

2) The "more credible" sources say that gun control is utter bollocks. The only ones that agree with it are the political spindoctoring ones.


1) Way to take an analogy way out of proportion, but you're bound to do that.

2) I was against gun control, but you had to try to look right.
Proletariacka Rzeczpospolita Nowy Tselinoyarsk
Proletarskaya Respubliki Novaya Tselinoyarsk

User avatar
Calldar
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Calldar » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:50 am

Des-Bal wrote:You can pick up a 22 caliber pistol for about three hundred bucks probably for less if your not going through legal channels.


Or you could go buy a Mosin Nagant at a random gun store for 80$ and really make a statement.
Pro-USA, Pro-Capitalism, Pro-Military, Pro-Globalization, Pro-Secularism Anti-Fascism, Anti-Racism, Anti-Communism, Anti-Nationalism

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.23
"In 1950 I wasn't pro-war, I was just anti-communist and pro-America. Then about 2 years into the war we were just north of Seoul, there was this pretty little village with all these pretty girls....we got ordered to pull back, and The Reds took the village. Calling me pro-war after that would have been an understatement." - Grandpa on the Korean War.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:51 am

The Soviet Technocracy wrote:A High Standard .22 target pistol is not $300.

$300 is a bit expensive for the mob anyways. They'll go after <$100 Raven Arms and Jiminez .25 ACPs.


1) No one sane thought the Earth was flat for any significant period of time.

Even Columbus was saw as a loon because he thought the Earth was half the size everyone else thought it was.

2) The "more credible" sources say that gun control is utter bollocks. The only ones that agree with it are the political spindoctoring ones.

Because if there's anything a mob hitman skimps on it's murder weapons.

Gun control laws are too varied across the states without federal legislation most of those studies are contaminated.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:52 am

Calldar wrote:
Or you could go buy a Mosin Nagant at a random gun store for 80$ and really make a statement.

Try to conceal a mosin nagant without looking like a drunk zombie. We'll wait.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Calldar
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Calldar » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:53 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Calldar wrote:
Or you could go buy a Mosin Nagant at a random gun store for 80$ and really make a statement.

Try to conceal a mosin nagant without looking like a drunk zombie. We'll wait.


You could always tell people you have a huge package.
Pro-USA, Pro-Capitalism, Pro-Military, Pro-Globalization, Pro-Secularism Anti-Fascism, Anti-Racism, Anti-Communism, Anti-Nationalism

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.23
"In 1950 I wasn't pro-war, I was just anti-communist and pro-America. Then about 2 years into the war we were just north of Seoul, there was this pretty little village with all these pretty girls....we got ordered to pull back, and The Reds took the village. Calling me pro-war after that would have been an understatement." - Grandpa on the Korean War.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:54 am

Calldar wrote:
You could always tell people you have a huge package.

I constantly tell people that but they still generally notice when I stuff russian sniper rifles down my pants.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Joneslind
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 426
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Joneslind » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:55 am

we need guns for protecshen i meen the bad guys have guns why cant the good guys

User avatar
William Delaney III
Envoy
 
Posts: 311
Founded: Sep 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby William Delaney III » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:59 am

Novaya Tselinoyarsk wrote:
William Delaney III wrote:Otherwise, I'm a little bit skeptical of the ability of gun control laws to reduce violent crime, and I only tend to err, grudgingly, on the side of thinking it might work because the more credible scientific sources tend to think it would be a good idea.


And for a long ass period of time most people thought the Earth was flat, doesn't mean it was right.
Okay...so, you want to show me some statistics that prove people in high crime districts tend to be more likely to think that gun laws are necessary, or would you like to tell me the one about how you really think you would be the first to shoot if you pulled a gun on an armed intruder?

Look, guns are useless to me. I am a PUSSY when it comes to violent situations. They may make YOU feel more secure, but I figure that I would live longer if I relied on diplomacy to resolve such situations.

If you want to argue the subject until kingdom come, fine, but you're not going to succeed in getting someone of my disposition excited about "gun rights." I seriously wouldn't give a fuck, and all that I know is that the guys in the white coats seem to think it would be a grand idea to get rid of them.

User avatar
Yefrovania
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 48
Founded: Jul 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Yefrovania » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:00 am

yea the USA culture is part of the reason gun crimes are so high. However, the guns I do have are my property, taking them away is theft. Even if under the pretense of a "law". fuck that.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:01 am

Yefrovania wrote:yea the USA culture is part of the reason gun crimes are so high. However, the guns I do have are my property, taking them away is theft. Even if under the pretense of a "law". fuck that.


No it's not.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Novaya Tselinoyarsk
Senator
 
Posts: 4091
Founded: Aug 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Novaya Tselinoyarsk » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:03 am

William Delaney III wrote:If you want to argue the subject until kingdom come, fine, but you're not going to succeed in getting someone of my disposition excited about "gun rights." I seriously wouldn't give a fuck, and all that I know is that the guys in the white coats seem to think it would be a grand idea to get rid of them.


At least you're admitting you'll be ignorant to the whole situation, so why even bother? You think because some people think it would be a good idea you'll follow it? How would you enforce it in any country, not even including the United States? It's a nice Utopian idea, but it'll never happen until all guns have to be FORCEFULLY controlled by some sort of DNA to even operate. Then you know what will happen? Black Market going up, up, up.
Last edited by Novaya Tselinoyarsk on Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Proletariacka Rzeczpospolita Nowy Tselinoyarsk
Proletarskaya Respubliki Novaya Tselinoyarsk

User avatar
Urwumpe
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Mar 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Urwumpe » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:05 am

Open carry. if you show that you walk around with a 120 mm mortar, you can't secretly smuggle one into school to make a massacre.

User avatar
Novaya Tselinoyarsk
Senator
 
Posts: 4091
Founded: Aug 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Novaya Tselinoyarsk » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:06 am

Urwumpe wrote:Open carry. if you show that you walk around with a 120 mm mortar, you can't secretly smuggle one into school to make a massacre.


I'd like to see how you would sneak one in in the first place..

"Oh, it's just a Troy horse for our school play!"
Last edited by Novaya Tselinoyarsk on Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Proletariacka Rzeczpospolita Nowy Tselinoyarsk
Proletarskaya Respubliki Novaya Tselinoyarsk

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, Camelone, Eskos, Eternal Algerstonia, Floofybit, Honghai, Old Temecula, Senkaku, The Jamesian Republic, Trump Almighty, Washington-Columbia, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads