NATION

PASSWORD

Gun Rights

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which do you like?

Conceal Carry
151
15%
Open Carry
85
9%
Both open and conceal carry
422
42%
Keep guns in the house
153
15%
Ban guns
182
18%
 
Total votes : 993

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9953
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:10 pm

Lessnt wrote:
Tsal-Kar wrote:
Or, it could be that gun control doesn't reduce violent crime in America! *GASP!!!* :eek:

I like how military equipment the US gov sells/gifts to other countries some of it will most likely find their way back to america in the hands of criminals.


The stuff that's been coming back to the US from the Lend/Lease program are M1 Garands, M1 Carbines, 1903 Springfields, 1917 Enfields, etc. They're not really the types of weapons that criminals favor.
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Tsal-Kar
Envoy
 
Posts: 218
Founded: Jun 04, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsal-Kar » Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:21 pm

President Mathias wrote:
Vingtor wrote:Yes, it would. The real question I think is "Why is it illegal?"

The reason I didn't ask the same thing is because of people like the first guy who replied. There is no example, EVER, of someone od-ing on Marijuana. While it is physically possible, you'd fall asleep way before smoking your own weight. The 'experiments' that killed monkeys in the 80's were because they stuck them in boxes, and then just kept pumping the smoke in until the things suffocated.


My apologies for not clarifying; I should've specified that the ODs would be reduced if the harder drugs were legalized
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social: Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.41

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:25 pm

Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Lessnt wrote:I like how military equipment the US gov sells/gifts to other countries some of it will most likely find their way back to america in the hands of criminals.


The stuff that's been coming back to the US from the Lend/Lease program are M1 Garands, M1 Carbines, 1903 Springfields, 1917 Enfields, etc. They're not really the types of weapons that criminals favor.

I am more thinking modern assault rifles.
From foreign governments who cannot keep a good hold on them.
That go into the black market.
Last edited by Lessnt on Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Xercon
Attaché
 
Posts: 93
Founded: Aug 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Xercon » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:30 pm

There's no nice way to put it.

If you actually support citizens having guns... you are a moron.

I cannot begin to describe how f***ed up it is that you can own a gun in America when you're 18 but you can't drink until you're 21.

How dumb can people possibly get?

Ban guns outright. The only people who should have guns are the military. MAYBE the police.
Nation does not reflect true political views.
My true political views are as below:

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.46

User avatar
Free Pangea
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1049
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Pangea » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:31 pm

I support moderate gun control (licensing as well as bans on automatic weapons).
~From the desk of Andrew Equilibrium~
There is no difference between my OOC and IC views with this nation. Free Pangea is my utopia.
"capitalism is organized crime" - unknown
"power to the proletariat!" - motto of Free Pangea
"fascism is capitalism in decay" - Vladamir Lenin
"Nothing can be more abhorrent to democracy than to imprison a person or keep him in prison because he is unpopular. This is really the test of civilization." - Winston Churchill
My views
Political compass
Proud supporter of the Democratic Socialist Alliance
Vote Stewart Alexander for US president in 2012!

User avatar
Krocodilia
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Gun Rights

Postby Krocodilia » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:32 pm

It seems that all of the recent posts are replies. Well, I just changed that.

We Krocodilians can openly carry any damn weapon we want, whether it be a pistol or a hydrogen bomb.

Yeah baby, this is Krocodilia. :twisted:

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:40 pm

Xercon wrote:There's no nice way to put it.

If you actually support citizens having guns... you are a moron.

I cannot begin to describe how f***ed up it is that you can own a gun in America when you're 18 but you can't drink until you're 21.

How dumb can people possibly get?

Ban guns outright. The only people who should have guns are the military. MAYBE the police.

Why is it dumb?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:51 pm

I'm not fond of most regulations but I find myself getting behind many gun restrictions for the simple fact that people are really really stupid. I believe that all responsible and competent people should be armed that being said experience tells me most people with a closet full of fully automatic weapons are neither of those things. The right to bear arms is a fundamental right of all free men but there really should be certification and reasonable limits on what you can own.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:56 pm

Des-Bal wrote:I'm not fond of most regulations but I find myself getting behind many gun restrictions for the simple fact that people are really really stupid. I believe that all responsible and competent people should be armed that being said experience tells me most people with a closet full of fully automatic weapons are neither of those things. The right to bear arms is a fundamental right of all free men but there really should be certification and reasonable limits on what you can own.

So you cannot be a free man unless someone deems you worthy of being free?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:05 pm

Lessnt wrote:So you cannot be a free man unless someone deems you worthy of being free?

I wouldn't put someone in a car if I wasn't sure they knew what they were doing and I sure as hell wouldn't put them behind a weapon of death.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9953
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:11 pm

Free Pangea wrote:I support moderate gun control (licensing as well as bans on automatic weapons).


Legally owned automatic weapons are almost never used in crimes (the kind of people that can afford to purchase transferable select fire/full auto weapons aren't the kind of people that use them to commit crimes). IMO, there's no reason for them to be banned.
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:18 pm

Xercon wrote:There's no nice way to put it.

If you actually support citizens having guns... you are a moron.

I cannot begin to describe how f***ed up it is that you can own a gun in America when you're 18 but you can't drink until you're 21.

How dumb can people possibly get?

Ban guns outright. The only people who should have guns are the military. MAYBE the police.


*** Warned for flamebait ***
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:18 pm

Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Legally owned automatic weapons are almost never used in crimes (the kind of people that can afford to purchase transferable select fire/full auto weapons aren't the kind of people that use them to commit crimes). IMO, there's no reason for them to be banned.

Automatic weapons are tricky, while they can be fun to use recreationally they aren't practical for self defense and can be terrifying liabilities in the wrong hands. People should have access but it shouldn't be easy.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
The Gregorach
Attaché
 
Posts: 72
Founded: Apr 09, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Gregorach » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:31 pm

Actually, not once has a legally owned automatic weapon been used in a crime.

I consider all gun laws to be unconstitutional, and the one thing that would see me take up arms against the government would be a ban on guns.
Economic Left/Right: 8.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 7.38

Propaganda Minister of NAZI EUROPE

NRA Life Member

14/88

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:33 pm

The Gregorach wrote:Actually, not once has a legally owned automatic weapon been used in a crime.

I consider all gun laws to be unconstitutional, and the one thing that would see me take up arms against the government would be a ban on guns.


I hope that works out for you because if it doesn't your going to be shot or stuffed into a dark hole.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Senestrum
Senator
 
Posts: 4691
Founded: Sep 15, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Senestrum » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:39 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Legally owned automatic weapons are almost never used in crimes (the kind of people that can afford to purchase transferable select fire/full auto weapons aren't the kind of people that use them to commit crimes). IMO, there's no reason for them to be banned.

Automatic weapons are tricky, while they can be fun to use recreationally they aren't practical for self defense and can be terrifying liabilities in the wrong hands. People should have access but it shouldn't be easy.


Please, I'm more worried about people with semi-automatic weapons than I am about people with automatics. Automatic fire is a waste of bullets except under very specific circumstances.
Need help with lineart or technical drawings? Want comments and critique? Or do you just want to show off?
If so, join Lineartinc today, Nationstates' only lineart community!
We welcome people of any skill level, from first-timers to veteran artists.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:42 pm

Senestrum wrote:
Please, I'm more worried about people with semi-automatic weapons than I am about people with automatics. Automatic fire is a waste of bullets except under very specific circumstances.


Having a dense crowd full of soft targets is one of those circumstances.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Senestrum
Senator
 
Posts: 4691
Founded: Sep 15, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Senestrum » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:44 pm

No it's not.

Aimed semiautomatic fire will kill a lot more people, you won't be wasting multiple shots on any given individual.
Need help with lineart or technical drawings? Want comments and critique? Or do you just want to show off?
If so, join Lineartinc today, Nationstates' only lineart community!
We welcome people of any skill level, from first-timers to veteran artists.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:48 pm

Senestrum wrote:No it's not.

Aimed semiautomatic fire will kill a lot more people, you won't be wasting multiple shots on any given individual.


That's if you don't factor in bullet penetration.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Senestrum
Senator
 
Posts: 4691
Founded: Sep 15, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Senestrum » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:53 pm

Bullets will penetrate regardless of whether they are fired out of a semiautomatic or an automatic weapon. Besides, they lose most of their lethality after going through a person even if they don't hit bone.
Need help with lineart or technical drawings? Want comments and critique? Or do you just want to show off?
If so, join Lineartinc today, Nationstates' only lineart community!
We welcome people of any skill level, from first-timers to veteran artists.

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:00 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Lessnt wrote:So you cannot be a free man unless someone deems you worthy of being free?

I wouldn't put someone in a car if I wasn't sure they knew what they were doing and I sure as hell wouldn't put them behind a weapon of death.

Yet having a car is not part of being a free man...having a weapon is however.

User avatar
Dolmhold
Minister
 
Posts: 2991
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dolmhold » Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:30 pm

originally I was extremely anti-gun. Howeverm the more I think about it the more I think they should be allowed but you'd require extensive background checks and a high legal age, along with no history of intoxination (drunk) or etc.

User avatar
Andaluciae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5766
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Andaluciae » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:13 pm

Free Pangea wrote:I support moderate gun control (licensing as well as bans on automatic weapons).


I guess my question would be, how does one go about licensing, with so many previously owned firearms out there. My parents have my Grandpa's childhood .22, and my great-grandfather's .30-30. I own a .22 Target pistol. How do you follow those things?
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

User avatar
Andaluciae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5766
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Andaluciae » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:16 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Lessnt wrote:So you cannot be a free man unless someone deems you worthy of being free?

I wouldn't put someone in a car if I wasn't sure they knew what they were doing and I sure as hell wouldn't put them behind a weapon of death.



My High-Standard .22 lr pistol is most certainly not a weapon of death.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16905
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:21 pm

Andaluciae wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:I wouldn't put someone in a car if I wasn't sure they knew what they were doing and I sure as hell wouldn't put them behind a weapon of death.



My High-Standard .22 lr pistol is most certainly not a weapon of death.


Yes it is. I guarantee you could kill somebody with it, and not just with a shot to the head. Don't ever discount the killing power of the .22LR.

If ya can't treat the little guns as dangerous, you ought not carry any.
Last edited by Separatist Peoples on Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

His Worshipfulness Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Di-Camilleri di-Rosica, Diopolis, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads