
by The_pantless_hero » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:28 am
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

by Treznor » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:32 am

by You-Gi-Owe » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:46 am
Pantless Hero wrote:Here's what needs to happen. Some one with some balls and brains needs to tell Obama that Republicans will never support the bill. Ever. Ever. This is not about the bill. It never was about the bill. If George Bush had proposed the same bill, we would have universal healthcare. This is about politics and much like capitalism, politics means generating the most benefit for the person at the top while fucking over the little people but getting their support by lying to them. Apparently Howard Dean is the only man with balls big enough to go out and say "Obama is doing it wrong" but he doesn't have the sway. Some one important needs to go out, call Obama an idiot, and call for Senate Democrats to scrap the POS compromise plan they have now and frame a new plan without the Blue Dog compromise, without the drug company Faustian Deal (it's not even a compromise), and any other detriment to the people compromises. The new plan needs to be well defined up front so they can go and sell it straight to the people word for word so the Republicans can't corrupt truths, generate lies, and spread misinformation about it for their own benefit.

by United Russian State » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:46 am

by Port Arcana » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:47 am

by The_pantless_hero » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:50 am
United Russian State wrote:America is very much in debt. At least over a trillion. You want goverment healthcare now?! Should wait for better economy.
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

by Treznor » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:50 am
United Russian State wrote:America is very much in debt. At least over a trillion. You want goverment healthcare now?! Should wait for better economy.

by Port Arcana » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:52 am

by United Russian State » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:53 am
The_pantless_hero wrote:United Russian State wrote:America is very much in debt. At least over a trillion. You want goverment healthcare now?! Should wait for better economy.
Never mind the fact that the US already spends more per capita on healthcare than every nation that actually has government healthcare.

by Port Arcana » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:55 am
United Russian State wrote:The_pantless_hero wrote:United Russian State wrote:America is very much in debt. At least over a trillion. You want goverment healthcare now?! Should wait for better economy.
Never mind the fact that the US already spends more per capita on healthcare than every nation that actually has government healthcare.
If this is ture it should be the best in world. This must mean America goverment is miss using money. In that case if anything it would be bad for it to be put under more goverment control. If the goverment Iis doing bad now it will do worse when it becomes bigger.

by You-Gi-Owe » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:56 am
Port Arcana wrote:Don't they just need 50 votes to pass it? There's 58 Dems and 2 left-leaning independents, minus some conservative dems and adding some moderate Republicans... they can pass a public health option, can't they?

by The_pantless_hero » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:57 am
You-Gi-Owe wrote:Still, your argument isn't based in reality. The reason that the Democratic Party has the majority that it enjoys is because of the Blue Dog Democrats. The Blue Dogs were chosen by the powers (including Rom Emanuel) in the the party, to run against conservatives in districts that might go Democrat, but were unlikely to go liberal.
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

by GetBert » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:59 am

by The_pantless_hero » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:01 am
You-Gi-Owe wrote:Port Arcana wrote:Don't they just need 50 votes to pass it? There's 58 Dems and 2 left-leaning independents, minus some conservative dems and adding some moderate Republicans... they can pass a public health option, can't they?
Yes, but the number is short, in terms of a fillibuster.
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

by You-Gi-Owe » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:01 am
The_pantless_hero wrote:You-Gi-Owe wrote:Still, your argument isn't based in reality. The reason that the Democratic Party has the majority that it enjoys is because of the Blue Dog Democrats. The Blue Dogs were chosen by the powers (including Rom Emanuel) in the the party, to run against conservatives in districts that might go Democrat, but were unlikely to go liberal.
What the fuck does Rahm Emanuel have to do with anything? Are you pulling some partisan appeal to power crap? It was Howard Dean who came up with the 50 state strategy. It was Howard Dean who saved our asses. But since we won, we gave Tim Kaine control of the DNC and look where that is getting us. We switched from Dean to Kaine because the theory went that we didn't need a minority party ('war time' perhaps) DNC head when we had already won. Being a centrist to a fault, Obama failed to realize politics is a never-ending war between Democrats and Republicans with a handful of third party mercenaries. One can't be complacent and dump the abrasive, but very effective, guy when you "win." Because you don't win, you just have the upper hand.

by The_pantless_hero » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:02 am
GetBert wrote:For fuck's sake stop starting new Obamacare threads
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

by Muravyets » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:02 am
The_pantless_hero wrote:You-Gi-Owe wrote:Still, your argument isn't based in reality. The reason that the Democratic Party has the majority that it enjoys is because of the Blue Dog Democrats. The Blue Dogs were chosen by the powers (including Rom Emanuel) in the the party, to run against conservatives in districts that might go Democrat, but were unlikely to go liberal.
What the fuck does Rahm Emanuel have to do with anything? Are you pulling some partisan appeal to power crap? It was Howard Dean who came up with the 50 state strategy. It was Howard Dean who saved our asses. But since we won, we gave Tim Kaine control of the DNC and look where that is getting us. We switched from Dean to Kaine because the theory went that we didn't need a minority party ('war time' perhaps) DNC head when we had already won. Being a centrist to a fault, Obama failed to realize politics is a never-ending war between Democrats and Republicans with a handful of third party mercenaries. One can't be complacent and dump the abrasive, but very effective, guy when you "win." Because you don't win, you just have the upper hand.

by You-Gi-Owe » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:03 am
GetBert wrote:For fuck's sake stop starting new Obamacare threads

by The_pantless_hero » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:04 am
Muravyets wrote:The_pantless_hero wrote:You-Gi-Owe wrote:Still, your argument isn't based in reality. The reason that the Democratic Party has the majority that it enjoys is because of the Blue Dog Democrats. The Blue Dogs were chosen by the powers (including Rom Emanuel) in the the party, to run against conservatives in districts that might go Democrat, but were unlikely to go liberal.
What the fuck does Rahm Emanuel have to do with anything? Are you pulling some partisan appeal to power crap? It was Howard Dean who came up with the 50 state strategy. It was Howard Dean who saved our asses. But since we won, we gave Tim Kaine control of the DNC and look where that is getting us. We switched from Dean to Kaine because the theory went that we didn't need a minority party ('war time' perhaps) DNC head when we had already won. Being a centrist to a fault, Obama failed to realize politics is a never-ending war between Democrats and Republicans with a handful of third party mercenaries. One can't be complacent and dump the abrasive, but very effective, guy when you "win." Because you don't win, you just have the upper hand.
Upper hand for the moment.
Despite several political missteps, Dean has proven his worth and even made me change my formerly negative view of him. He has shown that he has the ability to clarify a party message and get it communicated clearly to the public -- and lacking that is exactly what is allowing the rightwing to kill health care reform now. Also, Dean has state-level experience at actually implementing a working public option health care system.
The Dems seem only comfortable when they are losing, but I wish they would try to lose less of OUR stuff to keep them in their comfort zone. *is disgusted*
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

by United Russian State » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:05 am
No, this means that all the money is going into the pockets of greedy insurance companies who are denying coverage of people that are actually sick.

by The_pantless_hero » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:06 am
United Russian State wrote:No, this means that all the money is going into the pockets of greedy insurance companies who are denying coverage of people that are actually sick.
Your going find out goverment officals can just be as greedy.
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

by Muravyets » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:08 am
The_pantless_hero wrote:I never had a negative view of Dean and the only reason anyone would is because the Republicans ran a far too effective smear campaign based on a single, nondescript action from a single rally.

by Ring of Isengard » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:11 am

by The_pantless_hero » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:12 am
Muravyets wrote:The_pantless_hero wrote:I never had a negative view of Dean and the only reason anyone would is because the Republicans ran a far too effective smear campaign based on a single, nondescript action from a single rally.
I had a negative view of him because I lived in Vermont during the end of his tenure as governor and saw some unbelievably stupid and unconstructive shit happen. But later, I got to see how the state operated without him, and it was gradually getting even worse, so I began to realize it wasn't his fault after all. But I hadn't really formed a positive view of Dean until I saw him run the DNC.
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

by Farnhamia » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:18 am
United Russian State wrote:No, this means that all the money is going into the pockets of greedy insurance companies who are denying coverage of people that are actually sick.
Youre going find out goverment officals can just be as greedy.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Belarusball, Eurocom, EuroStralia, Glomb, Necroghastia, Newplym, Port Caverton, Rary, Sash Lilac, The Holy Rat
Advertisement