Your stance on gay marriage

[Grave_n_idle]

In what way?

To repeal DOMA activists will either need a majority in congress that support repeal (as well as a majority of the population so that congresspersons don't shy away from making the right choice), or be challenged in court. A law like DOMA will be appealed all the way to the supreme court. Do you see where I'm going with this?

No.

[The Halbetan Union]

To repeal DOMA activists will either need a majority in congress that support repeal (as well as a majority of the population so that congresspersons don't shy away from making the right choice), or be challenged in court. A law like DOMA will be appealed all the way to the supreme court. Do you see where I'm going with this?

No.

DOMA will be brought to the Supreme court, of which Scalia is a member...

[Grave_n_idle]

No.

DOMA will be brought to the Supreme court, of which Scalia is a member...

Indeed.

And?

[Glutch of Galt]

We would all be better of by sticking flaming torches up the asses of the homosexual community

[The Halbetan Union]

DOMA will be brought to the Supreme court, of which Scalia is a member...

Indeed.

And?

So... his opinion does matter.

[The Halbetan Union]

How the hell do you report people?

[Norstal]

How the hell do you report people?

Moderation forum.

[Grave_n_idle]

Indeed.

And?

So... his opinion does matter.

Do you think there are 9 of him?

[The Halbetan Union]

So... his opinion does matter.

Do you think there are 9 of him?

No, I think there are five.

[Ceannairceach]

We would all be better of by sticking flaming torches up the asses of the homosexual community

A community doesn't have a collective asshole, so I believe that to be impossible. Why we should do so is a large question as well.

[The Halbetan Union]

We would all be better of by sticking flaming torches up the asses of the homosexual community

A community doesn't have a collective asshole, so I believe that to be impossible. Why we should do so is a large question as well.

It is better to report it, than feed it.

[Vagrant Land]

We would all be better of by sticking flaming torches up the asses of the homosexual community

A community doesn't have a collective asshole, so I believe that to be impossible. Why we should do so is a large question as well.

I love trolls

[Grave_n_idle]

Do you think there are 9 of him?

No, I think there are five.

I think there's one. That's probably reality's liberal bias.

Regardless, unless you think that DOMA is going to overturn Loving v's Virginia, I'm really not sure why anyone should care about his (claimed) opinion.

[Herrebrugh]

We would all be better of by sticking flaming torches up the asses of the homosexual community

You fantasize about sticking a flaming torch up the asses of several gay guys? That sounds kinda... Gay perhaps?

[NERVUN]

We would all be better of by sticking flaming torches up the asses of the homosexual community

You fantasize about sticking a flaming torch up the asses of several gay guys? That sounds kinda... Gay perhaps?

The troll, please ignore it.

[Enadail]

In what way?

To repeal DOMA activists will either need a majority in congress that support repeal (as well as a majority of the population so that congresspersons don't shy away from making the right choice), or be challenged in court. A law like DOMA will be appealed all the way to the supreme court. Do you see where I'm going with this?

Still don't. It doesn't make Scalia's personal opinions of any value. Without the DOJ to back DOMA when it gets to the supreme court, it'll be very interesting. In fact, at this point it seems more just a matter of time for its repeal rather then if it can be. However, Scalia will still need to find legal reasoning as to why he's in support of DOMA... those are rather hard to find.

[The Halbetan Union]

No, I think there are five.

I think there's one. That's probably reality's liberal bias.

Regardless, unless you think that DOMA is going to overturn Loving v's Virginia, I'm really not sure why anyone should care about his (claimed) opinion.

All this conservative supreme court needs to do is rule in favor of DOMA and Loving v Virginia is meaningless, at least in the context of gay marriage. The fact that you have no concern about the consequences of DOMA reaching the high court worries me.

[The Halbetan Union]

To repeal DOMA activists will either need a majority in congress that support repeal (as well as a majority of the population so that congresspersons don't shy away from making the right choice), or be challenged in court. A law like DOMA will be appealed all the way to the supreme court. Do you see where I'm going with this?

Still don't. It doesn't make Scalia's personal opinions of any value. Without the DOJ to back DOMA when it gets to the supreme court, it'll be very interesting. In fact, at this point it seems more just a matter of time for its repeal rather then if it can be. However, Scalia will still need to find legal reasoning as to why he's in support of DOMA... those are rather hard to find.

The DOJ has already been replaced by a house appointed representative, and considering Scalias opinion on how the supreme court SHOULD interpret the constitution and his negative opinion on homosexuality in every instance that it has been brought to his attention; I"m inclined to believe he has all the reason he needs to rule in favor.

[The Montiarian Empire]

It should be allowed. I mean, come on, it doesn't affect you, so why not?

[Baharun]

It should be allowed. I mean, come on, it doesn't affect you, so why not?

It affects humanity.

[The Montiarian Empire]

It should be allowed. I mean, come on, it doesn't affect you, so why not?

It affects humanity.

Oh yes, because I am so affected by gay marriage.

[Ceannairceach]

It should be allowed. I mean, come on, it doesn't affect you, so why not?

It affects humanity.

Only that segment that likes to whine about things that doesn't involve them.

[Nova Nacio]

Nova Nacio supports gay marraige, as well as inter-racial marriage, need we go that far.

Why can't the rest of the US see they're hurting their citizens who decide on this. It is, after all, their decision to be what the want.

I say let them be and stop acting like God's policemen, is what I say to those who think otherwise.

those who continue to disagree and act like they have to enforce a slowly-deficient and now-dying word bearing no semblance of law nor order is going get outlawed, or worse, hurt for it someday if you don't come to grips with this cold hard truth.

[The Halbetan Union]

It affects humanity.

Only that segment that likes to whine about things that doesn't involve them.

Well... He IS right.

[Ceannairceach]

Only that segment that likes to whine about things that doesn't involve them.

Well... He IS right.

How so?