NationStates

Altamirus wrote:

Lucantis wrote:

!!! That's a good one............... Least I'm not one of the idiots who think the moon landings are fake. The moon is the only one that was visited in the History of Man by humans.

The stuff I bolded was the stuff you were right on. We've had the technology to go to Mars since the 1980s and their are no aliens on the moon.

Yes, there is/was. If you believe the landing was real then there were aliens on the Moon.

Altamirus wrote:

Voltronica wrote:Yes, there is/was. If you believe the landing was real then there were aliens on the Moon.

Horsehit. Prove it.

Humans do not live on the moon as a place of origin. Thus when "they" landed "they" were aliens.

The moon landings of the late 60's/early 70's were indeed faked. The reason they were staged is to distract the public from the fact that the ancient Egyptians colonized the moon several thousand years ago.

Coincidentally, this also answers the mystery of what the Pyramids were really used for: teleportation.

(fistfight happens between everyone here)

Big Jim P wrote:The moon landings of the late 60's/early 70's were indeed faked. The reason they were staged is to distract the public from the fact that the ancient Egyptians colonized the moon several thousand years ago.

Coincidentally, this also answers the mystery of what the Pyramids were really used for: teleportation.

Makes perfect sense.

Ifreann wrote:

Big Jim P wrote:The moon landings of the late 60's/early 70's were indeed faked. The reason they were staged is to distract the public from the fact that the ancient Egyptians colonized the moon several thousand years ago.

Coincidentally, this also answers the mystery of what the Pyramids were really used for: teleportation.

Makes perfect sense.

About two cents...

Man landing on the moon, real.
Some of the footage and photos, fake maybe.
I imagine that the US did set up a fake landing in a studio in case the images were unusable in some way.
Also i think that some of the photos have been touched up.

I'll land your fake or real moons!!

Antipidoes wrote:Man landing on the moon, real.
Some of the footage and photos, fake maybe.
I imagine that the US did set up a fake landing in a studio in case the images were unusable in some way.
Also i think that some of the photos have been touched up.

With fingers.

Hmmm. Four sides to join.
The ones who say we have gone but their were aliens.
The ones who say it was true.
The ones who say it was fake.
The ones who have their own theories on how it went down.


I'll join the,

I'll wait over here and have nachos because the debate is attracting too many conspiracies.



Honestly though, it was real.

Voltronica wrote:

Ifreann wrote:Makes perfect sense.

About two cents...

Which is just about what it costs to teleport a man to the moon. Now if we could just get them damn lunar Egyptians to give us the password.

This is almost as interesting as those "flat earth" threads a while back.

Namabia wrote:Hmmm. Four sides to join.
The ones who say we have gone but their were aliens.
The ones who say it was true.
The ones who say it was fake.
The ones who have their own theories on how it went down.


I'll join the,

I'll wait over here and have nachos because the debate is attracting too many conspiracies.



Honestly though, it was real.

Nachos and a movie and we've got a party if we have a beer.

Let's set up an account online, lure this moon landing in and ask questions the PROPER way...

Why don't you take a seat?

Beinai wrote:Let's set up an account online, lure this moon landing in and ask questions the PROPER way...
(Image)
Why don't you take a seat?

WIN /thread

Well considering the enormity that would be required in order to make the Moon Landing Conspiracy actually work, and the fact that no one from NASA, it's many subsidiaries and contractors, or anyone from the former USSR hasn't come out with any real convincing evidence that the USA Moon Landing is fake, I'd have to say that it's real.

Conserative Morality wrote:

Senestrum wrote:bolded the things that are wrong

We do have the technology to send man to Mars... If we want it to be a one-way trip.

I'm sure there are some people we could send to Mars that we wouldn't miss. Maybe Mars can become the new Australia?

Wilgrove wrote:

Conserative Morality wrote:We do have the technology to send man to Mars... If we want it to be a one-way trip.

I'm sure there are some people we could send to Mars that we wouldn't miss. Maybe Mars can become the new Australia?

I'd rather just build a chocolate factory so i can have authentic mars bars.

19 people are ignorant. The moon landings were 100% real.

Let's be honest, NS should be the last one to decide anything....

Comrade, let me take you up to the moon. It was actually a Soviet flag that the Soviet moon-lander put onto that rock.

Oh you got to love how all of the conspiracy theorists have blissfully ignored the fact all of their so called "evidence" that the moon landing was a hoax has been refuted over and over again.

It's impossible. Let's look at the facts...
1. The flag in the video was seen waving... On the MOON!
2. None of the film was damaged by the space radiation. The thin shield the apollo provided wouldn't be enough to protect the astronauts or keep the film 100% intact.
3. If the film is speed up a little bit the astronauts look like thy move normally... That proves it could be faked.
4. The landing the Apollo should have made all the nearby dust fly away, yet somehow Astrong makes a footprint...
5. I Armstrong was the first man on the moon then who was filming him?

It's real.

Norstal wrote:

Neragua wrote:Ok, I don't want to get to political or conspiratorial in this thread, I just want to get the general feel of NS in regards to the moon landing: was it real or was it fake?

Are you fucking kidding me?

Grammar Nazied.