Advertisement

by Robert Magoo » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:11 am

by MC United » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:11 am

by Equimanthon » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:16 am
Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:Is that what the Scotts think? Tha fact that they had to submit to English rule makes the survival of their language that much more important to them, I would think.
Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:Labour deserves the skeleton of Ramsay Macdonald as its leader.

by Vunaxtax » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:17 am


by H-Alba » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:20 am
Equimanthon wrote:Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:Is that what the Scotts think? Tha fact that they had to submit to English rule makes the survival of their language that much more important to them, I would think.
Submit to English rule? Their king became our king, not the other way round, and their parliament voted to unite as a country with us. Learn your history from books, not Braveheart.

by Vunaxtax » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:22 am

by Andaluciae » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:22 am
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

by Zarvarza » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:24 am

by Vunaxtax » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:26 am
So i'm going to go back to BYOND and play the game Sunday the 19th. aka my favorite on BYOND! >:) I think thats really enough that I said on this forum because I really don't want to spam. :S Anyway later guys! 
by Varazhdin » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:29 am
Zarvarza wrote:.
.
For all those who said they should preserve those old languages, please then start doing your part and learning one of them. The fact is unless you learn it, your not going to perserve anything, Language is in the hands of the people who speak it.
I, for one, support a singular Global Language, and most likely Mandarin will replace English as the Global Language by centuries end.

by Spartan Philidelphia » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:31 am
Varazhdin wrote:Zarvarza wrote:.
.
For all those who said they should preserve those old languages, please then start doing your part and learning one of them. The fact is unless you learn it, your not going to perserve anything, Language is in the hands of the people who speak it.
I, for one, support a singular Global Language, and most likely Mandarin will replace English as the Global Language by centuries end.
But there's not much point in other people learning it if the original speaker group loses it. Then it's pretty much just as dead.


by Angleter » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:32 am
MC United wrote:I think they should develop translation apps for the dying languages so they can communicate with their neighbors without needing to use the neighbor language. Or if all the apps translate into English and back then one app can translate from Dying Language A into English and the other from English to Dying Language B. Dying languages could then still be used. Probably wont capture all the shades of meaning but oh well, cant have everything.

by The Blaatschapen » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:37 am
Angleter wrote:MC United wrote:I think they should develop translation apps for the dying languages so they can communicate with their neighbors without needing to use the neighbor language. Or if all the apps translate into English and back then one app can translate from Dying Language A into English and the other from English to Dying Language B. Dying languages could then still be used. Probably wont capture all the shades of meaning but oh well, cant have everything.
I don't think the speakers of these sorts of languages tend to have smartphones.


by Great New Albion » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:37 am

by Hippostania » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:38 am

by Zarvarza » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:40 am
Hippostania wrote:We need less languages, not more. Globalization requires that all citizens of Earth should have at least basic knowledge of the current lingua franca, and if your native language is some endangered hoolaboogistan language, it's going to make learning English a lot more difficult.
My idea is if you can't find a McDonald's website in your language, then your language is useless and it should die out.

by SD_Film Artists » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:41 am

by Varazhdin » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:41 am
Great New Albion wrote:I think we should save dying languages. A language is a different way of thinking and a crucial component of it's culture. Diversity in the world is important.
Arguably languages are in fact no longer dying out naturally because they are unneeded. They're dying because of the pressures of globalism. The fact that half the worlds languages are expected to die by 2100 illustrates this.

by MC United » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:44 am
Angleter wrote:MC United wrote:I think they should develop translation apps for the dying languages so they can communicate with their neighbors without needing to use the neighbor language. Or if all the apps translate into English and back then one app can translate from Dying Language A into English and the other from English to Dying Language B. Dying languages could then still be used. Probably wont capture all the shades of meaning but oh well, cant have everything.
I don't think the speakers of these sorts of languages tend to have smartphones.

by SD_Film Artists » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:46 am
Varazhdin wrote:Conscentia wrote:
I disagree - the purpose of language is communication, hence easier communication is the perfect reason.
Language is not an element of identity - it is a means of communication. No one ever identified themselves by language. What matters is what the words mean - not what they are.
Yes it is,
because different people speak different languages. Language is a simbol of identity just like pretty much anything else that makes one person different from another person, like colour of persons house, or his favourite kind of music. Of course, it would be much simpler if we all lived in identical houses, ate identical food, or listen to identical music, but we don't do that.

by SD_Film Artists » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:48 am

by Equimanthon » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:49 am
H-Alba wrote:… England invaded us before the Stewarts became the Royal Family of England as well. Perhaps you should be the one to read a history book? During the second and third interregnum of the Scottish Royal Family the English had occupied Scotland, and set up their own lords and nobles. Why did the Scottish Parliament vote to unite as a country? Because they were Lowlanders, ethnically similar to the English, and culturally identical in nearly every aspect. Not very fair for the highlanders and gaels, now was it?
Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:Labour deserves the skeleton of Ramsay Macdonald as its leader.

by SD_Film Artists » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:52 am
Equimanthon wrote:H-Alba wrote:… England invaded us before the Stewarts became the Royal Family of England as well. Perhaps you should be the one to read a history book? During the second and third interregnum of the Scottish Royal Family the English had occupied Scotland, and set up their own lords and nobles. Why did the Scottish Parliament vote to unite as a country? Because they were Lowlanders, ethnically similar to the English, and culturally identical in nearly every aspect. Not very fair for the highlanders and gaels, now was it?
Yes, what a shame that those poor, apelike mountaindwelling highland cavemen had to come and live in cities like proper human beings and learn a real language, so sad.


by Forsakia » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:55 am
H-Alba wrote:Equimanthon wrote:
Submit to English rule? Their king became our king, not the other way round, and their parliament voted to unite as a country with us. Learn your history from books, not Braveheart.
… England invaded us before the Stewarts became the Royal Family of England as well. Perhaps you should be the one to read a history book? During the second and third interregnum of the Scottish Royal Family the English had occupied Scotland, and set up their own lords and nobles. Why did the Scottish Parliament vote to unite as a country? Because they were Lowlanders, ethnically similar to the English, and culturally identical in nearly every aspect. Not very fair for the highlanders and gaels, now was it?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Grinning Dragon, The Pirateariat, The Selkie
Advertisement