Advertisement

by Brewdomia » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:25 pm

by Jaigas » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:25 pm
Saint Clair Island wrote:Why did you true conservatives let the neocons hijack the Republican party? You should have taken a stand the way all those special interest groups did and voted for different candidates in the primaries.
I (who make that argument a lot) am aware that it's a flawed argument. It's meant to point out the failures of democracy to those who blindly continue to insist that it's the best system out there. Instead, I'd make the argument that government officials are supposed to do whatever they think is best because they, and not the mob and the demagogues who sway its sentiment, know what's best for the nation and the people as a whole.
The thing is, people often seem to misuse the term "tyranny". Tyranny is entirely subjective; a government is not tyrannical unless people believe it is. Hence the existence of the Constitution, so that people will not consider the US Government tyrannical and attempt to overthrow it. Moreover, all of the checks on the government's power are related to its federalist system, independent of the people -- hence why the executive cannot create legislation, the legislative cannot carry out the laws it passes, et cetera. Apart from these, in practice, there are no checks on the power of the state.

by Farnhamia » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:26 pm
Sdaeriji wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Frasas wrote:You are a tool, Saint Clair Island. I told you the values of true Conservatism and you generalized all Conservatives as this new generation of neo-cons.
And yet "true Conservatives" seem to be perfectly happy to use the neo-cons as their shock troops when it suits them. How is it, Frasas, that the neo-cons took control of the GOP more or less in the early 90s,and the "true Conservatives" have not tried to throw them out? Indeed, it would appear that "true Conservatives" have themselves been ejected from the Grand Old Party.
90s nothing. Neocons like Rumsfeld and Kissinger and Cheney got started under Nixon. The neocons have been stealing the Republican party away from "true conservatives" for forty years. That's why it's so hard to take all the No True Conservative arguments seriously; this trend has been going on for nearly half a century, and only now are they voicing any concerns about it.

by Treznor » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:26 pm
Frasas wrote:Treznor wrote:Farnhamia wrote:And yet "true Conservatives" seem to be perfectly happy to use the neo-cons as their shock troops when it suits them. How is it, Frasas, that the neo-cons took control of the GOP more or less in the early 90s,and the "true Conservatives" have not tried to throw them out? Indeed, it would appear that "true Conservatives" have themselves been ejected from the Grand Old Party.
90s? Earlier than that. They've been in the highest ranks of the GOP since the Nixon years. You do know where else Rumsfeld and Cheney served, right? The Nixon administration, followed by the Reagan administration and George H. W. Bush.
The idealogy did not emerge until the mid-90's by those who were pushing for an invasion of Iraq.

by Riveara » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:27 pm
Frasas wrote:ll stacking up... one after another. It began with states rights and sovereignty movements, Montana passing gun laws that fly in the face of the federal government, angry Tea Party protesters unhappy about our insane tax system, Town hall meetings with pissed off constituents, many of which have been threatened or been visited with threats in the middle of the night:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIP7hYqeegQ
I'm seeing more and more Gadsden flags then I have at any point in my life. The quiet Americans are coming out of the woodwork and speaking up. I can't say I've ever seen the American people this pissed off since I have been alive in my short time here on Earth. History has shown multiple times that you can only push a people so far before one of two things happen: The people revolt, or the government collapses. I really think in the case of Mr. Sola, it's only going to take the federal gestapo (I'm not talking regular rank and file LEO's here) to (*)(*)(*)(*) off the wrong person with a 2am visit... and we'll have another Waco or Ruby Ride on our hands... then the whole deck of cards will come falling down.

by Frasas » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:29 pm
Brewdomia wrote:This is bullshit, we are not going to have an American Revolution because of conservatives who are obsessed about Obama being elected and disagreeing with every goddamn plan he throws out there. There will not be any kind of revolution or crap in this country, because people are mad about socialism. These protesters at the town halls have no idea what socialism is, they just spread the crap the GOP and right wing radio hosts tell them. Some say get your government hands of their medicare? Some are incredibly ignorant, not all, but some.

by Frasas » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:33 pm

by Kynchile » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:33 pm

by Brewdomia » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:35 pm
Frasas wrote:Brewdomia wrote:This is bullshit, we are not going to have an American Revolution because of conservatives who are obsessed about Obama being elected and disagreeing with every goddamn plan he throws out there. There will not be any kind of revolution or crap in this country, because people are mad about socialism. These protesters at the town halls have no idea what socialism is, they just spread the crap the GOP and right wing radio hosts tell them. Some say get your government hands of their medicare? Some are incredibly ignorant, not all, but some.
Again, a ignorant, yet misinformed American who generalizes (like the incorrect radio talks shows) that the whole GOP are neo-cons looking to kill Socialists. I can tell you that the whole GOP are not war mongers and racists.

by Saint Clair Island » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:35 pm
Jaigas wrote:Saint Clair Island wrote:Why did you true conservatives let the neocons hijack the Republican party? You should have taken a stand the way all those special interest groups did and voted for different candidates in the primaries.
What the hell, man? You think that's any kind of point at all? No one just rolled over and surrendered to these clowns. No one knew better. It's the same as how so many old people are just now waking up and realizing that the Democrat party isn't theirs anymore.
I (who make that argument a lot) am aware that it's a flawed argument. It's meant to point out the failures of democracy to those who blindly continue to insist that it's the best system out there. Instead, I'd make the argument that government officials are supposed to do whatever they think is best because they, and not the mob and the demagogues who sway its sentiment, know what's best for the nation and the people as a whole.
Flawed argument there. Just being in a position of power does NOT, in the mind of any reasonable person, equate to knowing what's best for the country and its people. I don't think I need to explain this further. Feel free to alter your wording if you think the point is salvageable, and I'll simply dismiss this bit of nonsense.
The thing is, people often seem to misuse the term "tyranny". Tyranny is entirely subjective; a government is not tyrannical unless people believe it is. Hence the existence of the Constitution, so that people will not consider the US Government tyrannical and attempt to overthrow it. Moreover, all of the checks on the government's power are related to its federalist system, independent of the people -- hence why the executive cannot create legislation, the legislative cannot carry out the laws it passes, et cetera. Apart from these, in practice, there are no checks on the power of the state.
My point was not about tyranny or its definition, nor powers granted to or claimed by the state. Just about the social character of the country's populace. Please respond directly instead of going on tangents.

by H N Fiddlebottoms VIII » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:35 pm
Galloism wrote:H N Fiddlebottoms VIII wrote:I get the feeling that most people who say things like this have never actually tried having sex in a canoe, because it isn't so much being "close to water" as "falling into the water because canoes aren't very particularly stable."
Actually I have. They're rather stable if you've anchored it into the current properly.


by Frasas » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:37 pm
Brewdomia wrote:Frasas wrote:Brewdomia wrote:This is bullshit, we are not going to have an American Revolution because of conservatives who are obsessed about Obama being elected and disagreeing with every goddamn plan he throws out there. There will not be any kind of revolution or crap in this country, because people are mad about socialism. These protesters at the town halls have no idea what socialism is, they just spread the crap the GOP and right wing radio hosts tell them. Some say get your government hands of their medicare? Some are incredibly ignorant, not all, but some.
Again, a ignorant, yet misinformed American who generalizes (like the incorrect radio talks shows) that the whole GOP are neo-cons looking to kill Socialists. I can tell you that the whole GOP are not war mongers and racists.
I never said you are war-mongers or a racist, but this opposition is not sincere, it is mostly partisan politics.

by Ewa beach » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:38 pm

by Frasas » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:38 pm
Ewa beach wrote:yes i BELIEVE there will be another american civil war. the south will rise again and beat the north and i will be part of the south army fighting the north. i hope there will be. although i DONT KNOW, and for all you peope saying that there wont be another one, you dont know, anyhting is possible.now you BELIEVE that there wont be another one but you dont know for sure

by Farnhamia » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:39 pm
Ewa beach wrote:yes i BELIEVE there will be another american civil war. the south will rise again and beat the north and i will be part of the south army fighting the north. i hope there will be. although i DONT KNOW, and for all you peope saying that there wont be another one, you dont know, anyhting is possible.now you BELIEVE that there wont be another one but you dont know for sure

by Ewa beach » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:40 pm
Frasas wrote:Ewa beach wrote:yes i BELIEVE there will be another american civil war. the south will rise again and beat the north and i will be part of the south army fighting the north. i hope there will be. although i DONT KNOW, and for all you peope saying that there wont be another one, you dont know, anyhting is possible.now you BELIEVE that there wont be another one but you dont know for sure
Do we need to beat you again?

by Ewa beach » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:41 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Ewa beach wrote:yes i BELIEVE there will be another american civil war. the south will rise again and beat the north and i will be part of the south army fighting the north. i hope there will be. although i DONT KNOW, and for all you peope saying that there wont be another one, you dont know, anyhting is possible.now you BELIEVE that there wont be another one but you dont know for sure
Uh huh, right. You'll be running for the nearest big rock to hide behind, I betcha.
And I laugh at "The South will rise again."

by Frasas » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:42 pm
Ewa beach wrote:Frasas wrote:Ewa beach wrote:yes i BELIEVE there will be another american civil war. the south will rise again and beat the north and i will be part of the south army fighting the north. i hope there will be. although i DONT KNOW, and for all you peope saying that there wont be another one, you dont know, anyhting is possible.now you BELIEVE that there wont be another one but you dont know for sure
Do we need to beat you again?
again you dont know if youll beat us again anything can happen. i BELIEVE the south will rise again and beat the north and i think we"ll win


by Farnhamia » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:43 pm
Ewa beach wrote:Frasas wrote:Ewa beach wrote:yes i BELIEVE there will be another american civil war. the south will rise again and beat the north and i will be part of the south army fighting the north. i hope there will be. although i DONT KNOW, and for all you peope saying that there wont be another one, you dont know, anyhting is possible.now you BELIEVE that there wont be another one but you dont know for sure
Do we need to beat you again?
again you dont know if youll beat us again anything can happen. i BELIEVE the south will rise again and beat the north and i think we"ll win

by Saint Clair Island » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:44 pm
Riveara wrote:Their will never be an armed revolution in the USA because we are to pussy to actually defend our rights. We will speak up and be angry all we want, but if the government says "tough shit," then we will sit back down looking sullen. Nobody has the balls to have a revolution, even though it is perfectly legal in the constitution (or it use to be).

by Jaigas » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:45 pm
Saint Clair Island wrote:I'm curious, though. Neocons have been around for a while -- forty years, just about. And yet true conservatives haven't even tried to get true conservative politicians into power (unless you can name some true conservative politicians which I'm not aware of). Plenty of time for someone to wake up and notice that the Republicans weren't in favour of small government anymore.

by Frasas » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:45 pm
Ewa beach wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Ewa beach wrote:yes i BELIEVE there will be another american civil war. the south will rise again and beat the north and i will be part of the south army fighting the north. i hope there will be. although i DONT KNOW, and for all you peope saying that there wont be another one, you dont know, anyhting is possible.now you BELIEVE that there wont be another one but you dont know for sure
Uh huh, right. You'll be running for the nearest big rock to hide behind, I betcha.
And I laugh at "The South will rise again."
actually no i will be out on the frontlines shooting your dumb northen asses

by Frasas » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:48 pm
Saint Clair Island wrote:Riveara wrote:Their will never be an armed revolution in the USA because we are to pussy to actually defend our rights. We will speak up and be angry all we want, but if the government says "tough shit," then we will sit back down looking sullen. Nobody has the balls to have a revolution, even though it is perfectly legal in the constitution (or it use to be).
it is? I thought armed revolution was considered "treason", which was illegal.

by Ewa beach » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:48 pm

by Saint Clair Island » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:50 pm
Ewa beach wrote:umm no i own many guns that you dont know about
and im not 16. you dont know anything about me. you dont know how old i am or where i live
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bear Stearns, Eternal Algerstonia, EuroStralia, Neu California, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, The Holy Therns, The Kingdom of New Riverland, The Two Jerseys, Trump Almighty, Umeria, Unitarian Universalism
Advertisement