Les Drapeaux Brulants wrote:Jocabia wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Where exactly has my argument failed? My argument has succeeded. Obviously not in convincing you, but that's besides the point. The government has failed in projecting costs of various healthcare programs in the past by staggering amounts. I know, I know, lets give them the power over our healthcare. But wait! That is not enough! We should also make them be bankers, and car manufacturers. And run insurers. Seriously, as good as Obama is, we should abolish all private business and have him run it. That is the best way out of this private market created mess. Fuck those greedy capitalists. Scum.
/sarcasm
The government has so it's best that we look at similar systems. All historic and current data points away from your system and toward the proposed system. Now, I don't know where you studied economics but did they actually encourage you to actually look at similar systems and see how they work?
I would consider Medicaid to be a pretty similar system to what is proposed for the government option. The ten year cost of Medicaid was woefully underestimated -- By maybe six times? Plus, it's not that effective. Coverage isn't good, care isn't universally available, fraud is rampant, and it's going to be bankrupt in a few years.
Is that what we want to repeat?
Medicaid is funded by subsidies, not premiums.