NATION

PASSWORD

USA & The Metric System

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Would you be in favor of the metrication in the USA ???

Yes
94
66%
No
37
26%
Other
11
8%
 
Total votes : 142

User avatar
Hammurab
Minister
 
Posts: 2732
Founded: Dec 03, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Hammurab » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:12 pm

Fassitude wrote:
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:There is nothing worse than doing physics with imperial units.

But... why would you even attempt to? All the constants and forces and those... thingies, you know (damn, it's much too late for me to be typing in English).... are defined in SI units. To use something like pounds per square second strikes me as completely idiotic, and I have no idea how one would even begin to express units like kg·m2·s−2·K−1·mol−1 (Joules per kelvin mole) or m−3·s·A (Coulomb per cubic metre).


Its quite simple to one properly versed in the literature.

Joules per kelvin mole would be Cookies per Rankine Beaver, where one cookie is 4.186 Joules, a degree Rankine is needlessly laborious, and a Beaver is the number of particles in .32 Slugs of water.
"You can't be promising forever, George. Sooner or later, you must do something"

-The Libertine.

User avatar
Fassitude
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1403
Founded: Oct 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Fassitude » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:14 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Because most of the pipes and other infrastructure in this country is already based on the imperial system, so all new designs have to fit in with them. It is easier to engineer immediately in imperial units than it is to engineer in SI units and constantly convert back and forth.

I was under the understanding you were speaking of physics, not plumbing. And even there calculations in imperial units seem completely daft - "gallons per square inch"? (I actually laughed at that.)

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:15 pm

Fassitude wrote:But... why would you even attempt to? All the constants and forces and those... thingies, you know (damn, it's much too late for me to be typing in English).... are defined in SI units. To use something like pounds per square second strikes me as completely idiotic, and I have no idea how one would even begin to express units like kg·m2·s−2·K−1·mol−1 (Joules per kelvin mole) or m−3·s·A (Coulomb per cubic metre).


There's pounds of mass and pounds of force which are related by:

pounds of force = pounds of mass x 32.2ft/sec^2

But then there's slugs, which are a unit of mass related to pounds of force by:

pounds of force = slugs of mass x acceleration in ft/sec^2

It's seriously fucked in the ass.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:16 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Clearly superior? When an American is told by the weatherman it will be 70 degrees tomorrow he/she knows what to wear. When an American is told a town is 20 miles away he/she knows how far away it is. Same for others. Nothing superior about the metric system, just different. As long as the public understands what it means by a certain amount of given units, it's all good.


In terms of actual computation, SI units are inherently superior. That's why all US scientists use the SI system. I wonder how long it will take for engineers to completely catch on? Though part of the reason they don't convert is that they have to make their designs work with all the imperial crap we've already designed.


The average person is not a scientist. It would be easier for the average person to continue with his/her miles and gallons.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:19 pm

Sibirsky wrote:The average person is not a scientist. It would be easier for the average person to continue with his/her miles and gallons.


Natural units are even better than SI units for theoreticians, but they make very little sense to anyone without physics training. However, we should use them, because that would be awesome, and confusing people is fun! Seriously, you didn't know that us physicists kinda enjoy confusing people? :lol:
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Fassitude
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1403
Founded: Oct 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Fassitude » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:20 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:You use Celsius?

Of course I do. You do know where Celsius was from, don't you? And Celsius is after all an SI-derived unit, and thus SI. Also:Resolution 3 of the 13th meeting of the CGPM :)

User avatar
Fassitude
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1403
Founded: Oct 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Fassitude » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:23 pm

Hammurab wrote:Its quite simple to one properly versed in the literature.

Joules per kelvin mole would be Cookies per Rankine Beaver, where one cookie is 4.186 Joules, a degree Rankine is needlessly laborious, and a Beaver is the number of particles in .32 Slugs of water.

I laughed. Then I thought "maybe he isn't joking." Then I truly laughed.

User avatar
Discount Liquor World
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 165
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Discount Liquor World » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:23 pm

The European aerospace company Airbus used the superior Imperial System for their designs. Not a single blasphemous metric-hex bolt on any of the planes they produced. I can't even think of another good European aircraft manufacturer. Aerospatiale? No... Hmm...

I don't know, you Europeans are free to use your system. Americans don't want to convert ankletilts to a hogheads or whatever you people use when they want to know how many miles to a gallon their SUV gets.

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:23 pm

Fassitude wrote:Of course I do. You do know where Celsius was from, don't you? And Celsius is after all an SI-derived unit, and thus SI. Also:Resolution 3 of the 13th meeting of the CGPM :)


I'm saying you should use Kelvin, or natural temperature in which the Boltzmann constant is equal to one. That way temperature and average molecular kinetic energy are exactly equal. Combine that with c and h bar going to one, and temperature has units of inverse length.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Fassitude
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1403
Founded: Oct 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Fassitude » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:24 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:There's pounds of mass and pounds of force which are related by:
pounds of force = pounds of mass x 32.2ft/sec^2
But then there's slugs, which are a unit of mass related to pounds of force by:
pounds of force = slugs of mass x acceleration in ft/sec^2
It's seriously fucked in the ass.

:blink: :palm:

User avatar
Jeruselem
Minister
 
Posts: 2630
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Jeruselem » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:25 pm

If the US currency system is effectively metric, why can't everything else be?
Start using pounds, and pennies for the USA?
Jeruselem's sports achievements
http://www.nswiki.net/index.php?title=J ... hievements

Land of the Tiger Princesses

User avatar
The_pantless_hero
Senator
 
Posts: 4302
Founded: Mar 19, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby The_pantless_hero » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:26 pm

Aelosia wrote:The fact that you haven't changed is why I have a slight bias against America.

Oh no, they use a different style of measurement! Let's slight them!
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

Doing what we must because we can

User avatar
Fassitude
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1403
Founded: Oct 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Fassitude » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:26 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:I'm saying you should use Kelvin,

I do, interchangably with Celsius. My oven, however, doesn't.
or natural temperature in which the Boltzmann constant is equal to one. That way temperature and average molecular kinetic energy are exactly equal. Combine that with c and h bar going to one, and temperature has units of inverse length.

No practical advantage.

User avatar
Fassitude
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1403
Founded: Oct 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Fassitude » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:27 pm

Jeruselem wrote:If the US currency system is effectively metric,

Again, there is no such thing as "metric system". The word you seem to be looking for is "decimal".

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:27 pm

Fassitude wrote: :blink: :palm:


Don't forget how ounces can be both a unit of mass and a unit of volume depending on the context. It's like someone tried to purposely design the worst system of units possible for doing calculations.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Greed and Death » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:28 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Fassitude wrote: :blink: :palm:


Don't forget how ounces can be both a unit of mass and a unit of volume depending on the context. It's like someone tried to purposely design the worst system of units possible for doing calculations.

I don't think anyone does physics with imperial.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Fassitude
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1403
Founded: Oct 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Fassitude » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:28 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Don't forget how ounces can be both a unit of mass and a unit of volume depending on the context. It's like someone tried to purposely design the worst system of units possible for doing calculations.

Or the people that designed them simply didn't do calculations because they lived in the dark ages.

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:29 pm

Fassitude wrote:No practical advantage.


Well, if you want to know the average molecular kinetic energy in the water you're boiling, or you want to quickly calculate space-time intervals, or solve wavefunctions without a bunch of excess constants running around, then maybe it does have a practical use! *pouts*
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:30 pm

greed and death wrote:I don't think anyone does physics with imperial.


American engineering, especially hydraulic, aerospace, and mechanical. Engineering = applied physics. (usually)
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Hammurab
Minister
 
Posts: 2732
Founded: Dec 03, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Hammurab » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:30 pm

Fassitude wrote:
Hammurab wrote:Its quite simple to one properly versed in the literature.

Joules per kelvin mole would be Cookies per Rankine Beaver, where one cookie is 4.186 Joules, a degree Rankine is needlessly laborious, and a Beaver is the number of particles in .32 Slugs of water.

I laughed. Then I thought "maybe he isn't joking." Then I truly laughed.


You can laugh, but remember to use the old Imperial Unit of Humor, the Bennyhill, which is equal to the laughter invoked by 12 people observing one person strike another person in the crotch with a 5.5 bar of allotropic carbon.
"You can't be promising forever, George. Sooner or later, you must do something"

-The Libertine.

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:31 pm

Fassitude wrote:Or the people that designed them simply didn't do calculations because they lived in the dark ages.


Don't inject logic into my rant about how something lacks logic!
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Fassitude
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1403
Founded: Oct 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Fassitude » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:36 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Well, if you want to know the average molecular kinetic energy in the water you're boiling, or you want to quickly calculate space-time intervals, or solve wavefunctions without a bunch of excess constants running around, then maybe it does have a practical use! *pouts*

I have a simple rule of approximation: if I need to get out my TI-89 to do something, I should check if I really did pull out "The Joys of Croatian Cooking" from the shelf in lieu of my copy of "Multivariate Analysis".
Last edited by Fassitude on Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Fassitude
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1403
Founded: Oct 11, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby Fassitude » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:37 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Don't inject logic into my rant about how something lacks logic!

Even if it is the least logical thing to do.

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:40 pm

Fassitude wrote:I have a simple rule of approximation: if I need to get out my TI-89 to do something, I should check if I really did pull out "The Joys of Croatian Cooking" from the shelf in lieu of my copy of "Multivariate Analysis".


Oh, you're one of those people that actually bothered to learn how to cook?
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
New Mitanni
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1239
Founded: Jan 22, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: USA & The Metric System

Postby New Mitanni » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:41 pm

Chrobalta wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrication_in_the_United_States

I find myself wondering, why the hell is the U.S. not on the Metric system? The system itself is clearly superior to the U.S. Customary units system. So why the hell can't we just switch over to it like the rest of the world already has?

The only other countries not on the Metric system are Liberia and Burma - Third World Countries.


Why are we not on it yet, and would anybody else here be in favor of making the complete conversion?


There's no good reason to waste the money it would take to convert. And we're a big enough market to make our system stick. People who want to deal with us can adjust to our system. Liberia and Burma? Not so much.
November 2, 2010: Judgment Day. The 2010 anthem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgNFNTi46R4

You can't spell "liberal" without the L, the I and the E.

Smash Socialism Now!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, East Leaf Republic, Juristonia, Shrillland, Stratonesia, Tiami, Trumpton, Unmet Player

Advertisement

Remove ads