Call to power wrote:careful now, do you know who else had a history of drug usage in politics?
The candidate she supports is not a current drug user.
Advertisement
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:13 pm
Call to power wrote:careful now, do you know who else had a history of drug usage in politics?

by Sanguinthium » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:14 pm
Norstal wrote:France Deux wrote:I didn't know that Obama started the war on drugs.Little ridiculous to blame him, if you ask me.
He should be blamed for continuing however.I don't know if a society which allowed all drugs would be better. We didn't try that one out.
It would have advantages but disadvantages too. Are we prepared to 'pay' for these disadvantages?
IMHO, we should decriminalise drug users. That's including hard drug users. But we should still hunt the suppliers.
We should legally accept (that’s including harvesting, distributing, …) a range of soft drugs, like cannabis. But we should still forbid hard and really dangerous drugs.
Allowing all drugs is, for me, a bridge too far.
Well, that's why I'm for a progressive drug law. Allow marijuana use (and tax it of course) for one year. If it solves the debt, decrease drug use, or any other positive effect, then continue. If it doesn't, for any reason, then we should repeal such laws. Then, allow other soft drugs and do the same thing. We can eventually see if it will work out or not. It's a win-win.
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:15 pm


by Norstal » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:16 pm
Sanguinthium wrote:our federal government literally cannot legalize ganja. we signed a treaty promising we wouldnt in the late 30s
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Flameswroth » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:16 pm
New East Ireland wrote:You would think that the government would just start using real money instead of money made specifically for fighting a drug war...
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?
Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.
That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.

by UCUMAY » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:16 pm

by New East Ireland » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:16 pm


by Sanguinthium » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:19 pm

by Samozaryadnyastan » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:21 pm
Shocking. But the government is funding more government and government-run departments to combat drugs, how are they not working?New Manvir wrote:Over 50% of US prison inmates are in jail on drug charges. Around 83% of those arrests are for simple possession, and a disproportionate amount of the people arrested are minorities. It seems, since crime rates have been steadily declining, police departments justify their budgets by focusing more attention on arresting drug users (not producers and dealers, users).
Where's the conservative outrage over such wasteful spending and governmental mismanagement? Nowhere in sight, it seems.
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by UCUMAY » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:23 pm
Sanguinthium wrote:Norstal wrote:Which treaty was this?
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/lib ... geneva.htm
geneva narcotic limitation convention. 1931. screwed up my timeline on the date. meant early 30s


by Norstal » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:24 pm
Sanguinthium wrote:Norstal wrote:Which treaty was this?
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/lib ... geneva.htm
geneva narcotic limitation convention. 1931. screwed up my timeline on the date. meant early 30s
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by UCUMAY » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:25 pm
Norstal wrote:Sanguinthium wrote:
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/lib ... geneva.htm
geneva narcotic limitation convention. 1931. screwed up my timeline on the date. meant early 30s
Eh, I think we can make exception to this one. Or any other drug treaties. Not like they're going to try to invade us.

by Natapoc » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:25 pm

by Allemonde » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:26 pm

by Samozaryadnyastan » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:26 pm
UCUMAY wrote:Sanguinthium wrote:
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/lib ... geneva.htm
geneva narcotic limitation convention. 1931. screwed up my timeline on the date. meant early 30s
That doesn't affect Pot.
As it is a lot of our nation is considering or has made medical pot legal.
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by Tekania » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:27 pm

by Norstal » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:27 pm
UCUMAY wrote:It doesn't affect marijuana.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Samozaryadnyastan » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:27 pm
Natapoc wrote:Do you know there was a time when all drugs were legal? When no government would stop you from putting anything in your body that you pleased?
It's true! Only for a very small part of human history has the state possessed such power that it believes it can decide what it's citizens can and cannot put in their own bodies.
But that's not all, the state enforces such power with extreme brutality and violence. The drug war is proof of the police state. It's all the evidence needed to show that you are free: As long as you only want to do the things the government wants you to do!
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by UCUMAY » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:28 pm

by Norstal » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:30 pm
Natapoc wrote:Do you know there was a time when all drugs were legal? When no government would stop you from putting anything in your body that you pleased?
It's true! Only for a very small part of human history has the state possessed such power that it believes it can decide what it's citizens can and cannot put in their own bodies.
But that's not all, the state enforces such power with extreme brutality and violence. The drug war is proof of the police state. It's all the evidence needed to show that you are free: As long as you only want to do the things the government wants you to do!
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by New East Ireland » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:31 pm
Tekania wrote:New East Ireland wrote:Knowing the government's ability to avoid civilian targets, they might wipe themselves out in the process.
Okay, we'll drop the predator drones and use BGM/UGM-109E's, given their need for preset mission packages and their high level of accuracy and range, it'll reduce the likelihood of civilian causalities.

by Call to power » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:31 pm
Sibirsky wrote:The candidate she supports is not a current drug user.

by New Manvir » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:32 pm

by Flameswroth » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:36 pm
New Manvir wrote:It's funny, because they lost the moral high ground a long time ago.

Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?
Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.
That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Australian rePublic, Pasong Tirad, Senkaku
Advertisement