Advertisement

by Sanguinthium » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:00 pm

by Call to power » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:00 pm
Flameswroth wrote:To extend the metaphor further though, it sounds like the cancer is far too aggresive, and has metastasized (sp?) to pretty much everywhere down there. I think at this point doctors put patients on...what is it...palliative care? Basically we can't kill the cancer, so it's time to sit back on pain meds and wait to die...or in this case, stop all the torturous spending and try to alleviate the negative effects of the drugs rather than the presence of the drugs.

by Valtieres » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:00 pm
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:01 pm
UCUMAY wrote:I'm trying to put in a presidential candidate who will end the drug war.

by UCUMAY » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:02 pm

by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:02 pm
Ifreann wrote:Obviously the problem is not enough money being spent. More money! More! And more rubber ducks! More!

by New East Ireland » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:04 pm

by Norstal » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:05 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Flameswroth » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:05 pm
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?
Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.
That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:06 pm

by Flameswroth » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:07 pm
New East Ireland wrote:It's not like we can spend any of that money on things like healthcare, homelessness, starvation, unemployment, etc., etc. We need to waste all of it on fighting a war without guns! We need to increase border control, but leave the border unguarded for enough time to sneak 50 drug dealers into the country! It's time to act! Or not...
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?
Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.
That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.

by New East Ireland » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:08 pm
Sibirsky wrote:New Manvir wrote:
My Word! Perish the thought, Ifreann.
We just need to move all financial transactions to plastic. That'll stop those dastardly drug users.
I actually had a connection that took credit cards once. Sold weed right out of a Pizza Hut, would charge you for a pizza they never sold and take cash from the store.
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:08 pm
The Floridian Coast wrote:America - End Drug War + Tax Legal Drugs + Withdraw from Middle East + Cut off foreign aid (yes, even Israel, actually, especially Israel) = debt crisis solved. Are we really too stupid or stubborn of a nation to understand this?

by Sanguinthium » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:09 pm

by New East Ireland » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:09 pm
Flameswroth wrote:New East Ireland wrote:It's not like we can spend any of that money on things like healthcare, homelessness, starvation, unemployment, etc., etc. We need to waste all of it on fighting a war without guns! We need to increase border control, but leave the border unguarded for enough time to sneak 50 drug dealers into the country! It's time to act! Or not...
They're different kinds of money. Drug enforcement dollars can't be used on public welfare stuff, just like you can't use a Canadian coin in an American coke machine...by which I mean the soda machine, of course.

by Norstal » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:09 pm
France Deux wrote:I didn't know that Obama started the war on drugs.Little ridiculous to blame him, if you ask me.
I don't know if a society which allowed all drugs would be better. We didn't try that one out.
It would have advantages but disadvantages too. Are we prepared to 'pay' for these disadvantages?
IMHO, we should decriminalise drug users. That's including hard drug users. But we should still hunt the suppliers.
We should legally accept (that’s including harvesting, distributing, …) a range of soft drugs, like cannabis. But we should still forbid hard and really dangerous drugs.
Allowing all drugs is, for me, a bridge too far.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Norstal » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:10 pm
Flameswroth wrote:Sibirsky wrote:And I love you for your effort.
Damn it! I forgot to put 'inb4 Sibirsky' in my post! I was totally gonna, too. Drug War costs are a guarantee, just like that stink bait that catches carp...
...not that I am insinuating you resemble a carp in any way, shape or form...not that carps are a bad thing or anything, their lifestyle is just as valid as any other fish. I have nothing against carp! I have some friends that are carp, in fact...yeah...
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Call to power » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:10 pm
New Manvir wrote:It also states that much of Colombia's cocaine production moved to Peru, the problem isn't solved, just moved somewhere else.
Sibirsky wrote:And I love you for your effort.
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:10 pm
France Deux wrote:I didn't know that Obama started the war on drugs.Little ridiculous to blame him, if you ask me.
I don't know if a society which allowed all drugs would be better. We didn't try that one out.
It would have advantages but disadvantages too. Are we prepared to 'pay' for these disadvantages?
IMHO, we should decriminalise drug users. That's including hard drug users. But we should still hunt the suppliers.
We should legally accept (that’s including harvesting, distributing, …) a range of soft drugs, like cannabis. But we should still forbid hard and really dangerous drugs.
Allowing all drugs is, for me, a bridge too far.

by Uriash » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:11 pm
Sibirsky wrote:The Floridian Coast wrote:America - End Drug War + Tax Legal Drugs + Withdraw from Middle East + Cut off foreign aid (yes, even Israel, actually, especially Israel) = debt crisis solved. Are we really too stupid or stubborn of a nation to understand this?
No quite, but it's an excellent start.

by Flameswroth » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:11 pm
New East Ireland wrote:Flameswroth wrote:They're different kinds of money. Drug enforcement dollars can't be used on public welfare stuff, just like you can't use a Canadian coin in an American coke machine...by which I mean the soda machine, of course.
But wouldn't drug enforcement dollars equal a set amount of USD?
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?
Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.
That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.

by New East Ireland » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:11 pm
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:12 pm

by New East Ireland » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:13 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Australian rePublic, Pasong Tirad, Senkaku
Advertisement