Yes. History is objective by your point of view. Thats life, I suppose.
Advertisement
by Polska rzczpolspolita » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:41 pm
by Niur » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:43 pm
by Novograd IV » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:48 pm
by Niur » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:56 pm
by Novograd IV » Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:00 pm
Niur wrote:Novograd IV wrote:
Blue is a colour
And we had a GCSE paper on the tongue thing, if we have 'areas' of taste, then we certainly aren't capable of telling where they are.
No Blue is not a color. More so, by that I mean that if you were to take out the blood from a vein and put it immediatly in a vacuum, so that it never touched oxygen,m it wouldn't be this "blue" you speak of. It is dark red, with maybe a hint of violet. Veins appear blue because the subcutaneous fat absorbs low-frequency light, permitting only the highly energetic blue wavelengths to penetrate through to the dark vein and reflect off. And although certain areas of the tounge are slightly more sesitive to some tastes than others, all five tastes can be tasted anywhere on the top of the tounge.
by Novikov » Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:06 pm
Angleter wrote:Maps. History textbooks never get maps right.
by Niur » Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:19 pm
Novograd IV wrote:Niur wrote:No Blue is not a color. More so, by that I mean that if you were to take out the blood from a vein and put it immediatly in a vacuum, so that it never touched oxygen,m it wouldn't be this "blue" you speak of. It is dark red, with maybe a hint of violet. Veins appear blue because the subcutaneous fat absorbs low-frequency light, permitting only the highly energetic blue wavelengths to penetrate through to the dark vein and reflect off. And although certain areas of the tounge are slightly more sesitive to some tastes than others, all five tastes can be tasted anywhere on the top of the tounge.
But it is.
Also, I never said anything other than the fact that blue is a colour
by EvilDarkMagicians » Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:49 pm
by EvilDarkMagicians » Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:51 pm
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:The pullout method works.
by Arkinesia » Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:16 pm
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Coccygia » Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:43 pm
Unicario wrote:My first history book, from the early 2000's, from Japan, says that nothing happened in Nanking in 1937.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:48 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Munathanura » Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:49 pm
Zepplien wrote:Munathanura wrote:1) That the Japanese were going to invade Australia
2) That all Australians deliberately set out to massacre the Aboriginal people without exception and that the missions never helped the Aboriginals in any way, shape or form. Ever.
3) That the only noteworthy explorers were those who died from sheer stupidity or who disappeared mysteriously. Those who never loose a man despite exploring first extremely arid terrain and then braving the crocodiles of the Northern Territory and who manage to do all this despite travelling cumulative total of 11 995 km by land should no be mentioned at all.
The IJA did have plans for invasion as Austrailia was a huge thorn in the side of the empire. They did take over New Guinea capturing 15,000 Austrailion troops and if they had not engaged the United States an invasion would have commenced.
We never had enough troops to do so [invade Australia]. We had already far out-stretched our lines of communication. We did not have the armed strength or the supply facilities to mount such a terrific extension of our already over-strained and too thinly spread forces. We expected to occupy all New Guinea, to maintain Rabaul as a holding base, and to raid Northern Australia by air. But actual physical invasion — no, at no time.
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:
by Hardened Pyrokinetics » Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:57 pm
Pope Joan wrote:I had a client who stole the magnetic flashing light from the top of a police car.
It was parked in front of his house because they were asking his parents about his theft of 100 pounds of copper wire from the high school.
Galloism wrote:I bet it takes a lot of weed to get stoned to death.
New Manvir wrote:Canada: We have flying bears.
greed and death wrote:It is a sad day when we criticize the President for honoring a solider who gave everything for his nation.
by Munathanura » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:03 pm
Hardened Pyrokinetics wrote:Apparently, Canada has never done anything important ever. Holding off invasions by Americans during the American Revolution and War of 1812? Boer War? Vimy Ridge and the Hundred Days? Being on every single fucking front save one in World War II (even North Africa: Operation Reservist, part of Operation Torch, was led by a Canadian, who won a Victoria Cross for it)? Korean War? UN Peacekeeping? What are those?
Yeah, fuck my textbooks. And people wonder why I prefer to read history books I've bought instead of the school textbooks, or do the shitty schoolwork...
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:
by Hardened Pyrokinetics » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:06 pm
Munathanura wrote:Hardened Pyrokinetics wrote:Apparently, Canada has never done anything important ever. Holding off invasions by Americans during the American Revolution and War of 1812? Boer War? Vimy Ridge and the Hundred Days? Being on every single fucking front save one in World War II (even North Africa: Operation Reservist, part of Operation Torch, was led by a Canadian, who won a Victoria Cross for it)? Korean War? UN Peacekeeping? What are those?
Yeah, fuck my textbooks. And people wonder why I prefer to read history books I've bought instead of the school textbooks, or do the shitty schoolwork...
Seriously? Wow, that sucks. At least Australian textbooks take some pride in our history, even if they do leave out interesting stuff like the Rum Rebellion.
Pope Joan wrote:I had a client who stole the magnetic flashing light from the top of a police car.
It was parked in front of his house because they were asking his parents about his theft of 100 pounds of copper wire from the high school.
Galloism wrote:I bet it takes a lot of weed to get stoned to death.
New Manvir wrote:Canada: We have flying bears.
greed and death wrote:It is a sad day when we criticize the President for honoring a solider who gave everything for his nation.
by Munathanura » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:16 pm
Hardened Pyrokinetics wrote:Munathanura wrote:Seriously? Wow, that sucks. At least Australian textbooks take some pride in our history, even if they do leave out interesting stuff like the Rum Rebellion.
For some reason, Canadian schools, or at least the Alberta Board of Education, hate our military and want us to look like a land of pacifists.
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:
by Seleucas » Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:25 pm
by JuNii » Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:37 pm
by Hathradic States » Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:12 am
by Distruzio » Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:52 am
by Marcurix » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:06 am
That WW2 ended the Great Depression.
That Korea was a victory.
That Unions ensured a more humane workplace environment.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Corporate Collective Salvation, Emotional Support Crocodile, Naui Tu, The Archregimancy, The Jamesian Republic, Tlizja, Zurkerx
Advertisement