Advertisement
by Herpusderpus » Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:27 am
by Mr Bananagrabber » Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:27 am
by Vecherd » Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:42 am
Herpusderpus wrote:That a few Norwegians hiding in the forest single-handedly won WW2. K, not really, but you could get that impression.
I don't really recall much from the top of my head from history textbooks, but in 9th grade we had a textbook in science that claimed that glass is a liquid and that's the reason old windowpanes often are distorted.
by Munathanura » Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:39 am
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:
by Meowfoundland » Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:55 am
Munathanura wrote:3) That the only noteworthy explorers were those who died from sheer stupidity or who disappeared mysteriously. Those who never loose a man despite exploring first extremely arid terrain and then braving the crocodiles of the Northern Territory and who manage to do all this despite travelling cumulative total of 11 995 km by land should no be mentioned at all.
by Munathanura » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:01 am
Meowfoundland wrote:Munathanura wrote:3) That the only noteworthy explorers were those who died from sheer stupidity or who disappeared mysteriously. Those who never loose a man despite exploring first extremely arid terrain and then braving the crocodiles of the Northern Territory and who manage to do all this despite travelling cumulative total of 11 995 km by land should no be mentioned at all.
I have seriously never heard of this person.
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:
by Meowfoundland » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:05 am
Munathanura wrote:Meowfoundland wrote:I have seriously never heard of this person.
Like I said, Australian history books love to look at Burke and Wills, despite the entire expedition failing due to Burke's incompetence (and the stupidity of whoever put him in charge). In comparison, Gregory was highly intelligent, cultured and an experience bushman. He never lost a man or a horse on his two expeditions into the arid heart of WA, and the only reason he lost any animals on his expedition in the NT/NQLD was because of the incompetence of a few people working under him (aka the crew of the ship who offloaded some sheep into deep water or the geologist 2IC who went mad with power).
by Arumdaum » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:10 am
by Munathanura » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:11 am
Meowfoundland wrote:Munathanura wrote:
Like I said, Australian history books love to look at Burke and Wills, despite the entire expedition failing due to Burke's incompetence (and the stupidity of whoever put him in charge). In comparison, Gregory was highly intelligent, cultured and an experience bushman. He never lost a man or a horse on his two expeditions into the arid heart of WA, and the only reason he lost any animals on his expedition in the NT/NQLD was because of the incompetence of a few people working under him (aka the crew of the ship who offloaded some sheep into deep water or the geologist 2IC who went mad with power).
See, we learned about Burke & Wills (died while exploring), Leichhardt (still missing after 130 odd years) and Sturt (well, at least he didn't die while exploring). Gregory seems interesting.
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:
by Meowfoundland » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:13 am
Munathanura wrote:Meowfoundland wrote:
See, we learned about Burke & Wills (died while exploring), Leichhardt (still missing after 130 odd years) and Sturt (well, at least he didn't die while exploring). Gregory seems interesting.
Oh he was indeed. He was a bushman, surveyor, geologist and chemist at various times, an excellent leader of men and an all around good guy. If you can get a copy of it, Hard Country, Hard Men : In the Footsteps of Gregory is a good book to read. It follows one modern day guy as he tries to follow in the footsteps of Gregory and finds out just how hard and dangerous it was, as well as giving a lot of information on Gregory.
by West Vandengaarde » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:29 am
Legionica wrote::palm: Um, are you being sarcastic? 'Cause those things are both true.
by New Freedomstan » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:30 am
Vecherd wrote:Herpusderpus wrote:That a few Norwegians hiding in the forest single-handedly won WW2. K, not really, but you could get that impression.
I don't really recall much from the top of my head from history textbooks, but in 9th grade we had a textbook in science that claimed that glass is a liquid and that's the reason old windowpanes often are distorted.
Are you trying to tell me Milrog didn't win the war without help!
by Central Lothian » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:21 pm
by Italiani a Roma » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:24 pm
by Novograd IV » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:27 pm
by Novograd IV » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:28 pm
Italiani a Roma wrote:Well I can't remember one that my book got wrong, but I have had a teacher that said soething very wrong. She said that Remus killed Romulus, and named Rome after his brother in memorium.
by Niur » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:31 pm
Legionica wrote::palm: Um, are you being sarcastic? 'Cause those things are both true.
by The Archregimancy » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:35 pm
by Arilando » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:36 pm
AlexJacobii wrote:Anything about Columbus. Most of the sections about Scandinavia. The Crusades were only in the Middle East according to one textbook I had. That one was genius...
by Niur » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:37 pm
by Zepplien » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:38 pm
Munathanura wrote:1) That the Japanese were going to invade Australia
2) That all Australians deliberately set out to massacre the Aboriginal people without exception and that the missions never helped the Aboriginals in any way, shape or form. Ever.
3) That the only noteworthy explorers were those who died from sheer stupidity or who disappeared mysteriously. Those who never loose a man despite exploring first extremely arid terrain and then braving the crocodiles of the Northern Territory and who manage to do all this despite travelling cumulative total of 11 995 km by land should no be mentioned at all.
by Novograd IV » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:38 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Turenia
Advertisement