Strong Economy

[Revolutionarily]

what is the point of this thread?

[Galloism]

what is the point of this thread?

That if all nations would see the light and decide to have a strong economy, everyone would be better off.

[Sibirsky]

See United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan...

Also see Burundi, Zimbabwe, Liberia.

Yeah, the correlation isn't really about population size, but rather population growth. It's also more that the strong economies remove the pressure to have such a positive population growth.

That's just demographic transition. Stronger economy = slower population growth.

[Sibirsky]

what is the point of this thread?

That if all nations would see the light and decide to have a strong economy, everyone would be better off.

I thought we decided on weak economies?

[Galloism]

That if all nations would see the light and decide to have a strong economy, everyone would be better off.

I thought we decided on weak economies?

I don't pay attention to what you guys say.

[Syvorji]

Actually, a nation has a stronger economy than any other nation on Earth. Guess what the title goes to. If you said the DPRK, you are right, because ever since 1948, the DPRK had thrived. With a strong industry, jobs, and such, the DPRK had thrived, and prospered, to ensure a prosperous Korea, united with the capital inside Seoul. Under Kim il-Sung and myself, also known as Kim Jong-il, we abolished tax altogether, we have no debt, and exports increased by more than 1,500 percent. In contrast, the United States of America, which from this point on, I shall refer to as the Imperialist States of America has a basket-case economy (by Jennifer Government: NationStates standards), debt increased a quntillionfold, taxes rose to such a point that all of the burden falls on the working stiff, the poor, and ethnic minorities. Who started it? George Washington ensured the Imperialist States of America would be a superpower, and then rapidly decline. How did we know? He planned the whole thing, even the amount of Presidents, and thus, is why the Imperialist States of America has such a horrible economy since two thousand eight (2008, in legalese). It is proof why capitalism had failed, because it does not address anything. Nextly, the more people the Imperialist States of America has, the less jobs there will be and the more people will be homeless, due to foreclosures WHICH the government had planned and targeted in the first place. Secondly, more protection? If it were true, the Imperialist States of America would still have an extremely strong economy, and thus a reason to compete with the Imperialist States of America. More rights? That is not a good idea, because many a time, capitalism oppressed the people. Ergo, there will be no rights. And more control? Welcome to imperialism and oppression, Imperialist States of America. For a long time, the Imperialist States of America have gone down the path of cutting human rights, to such a point that they even have a horrible equivalent to Camp 22, inside Cuba, where it should NOT belong, where torture and such are rampant. Thus, we can safely prove that your questions are put to rest. Now that I answered with an extremely long wall of text, please, realize that your answers are answered, for the Imperialist States of America. The DPRK, on the other hand, is an entirely different story and opposite than the situation inside the Imperialist States of America, due to Juche, and so naturally, it is it.