Samuraikoku wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:Essentially, the very meaning of the word "Christ." Let's remember that the epithet "Christ" is derived from the Koine khristos, meaning "anointed one" or "savior."
Now, a Christian is one who follows someone or something which can properly be termed "Christ," and so if someone or something is to be termed "Christ" then he/she/it must have some attribute that makes him "anointed" or our "savior." So what is it about Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ (again, the ideal that may correspond more or less to the historical person, if--as is quite likely--such a person even existed), that makes him "anointed" or our "savior"? Acolytes of the cult of Jesus and Jehovah will tell you that it is his status as the supposed son of god. But (to repeat what I said above) Jesus lived and worked in the real world, and the existence of a god is incompatible with the real world--and if there is no god, then it is impossible for someone to be the son of a god. So we must look elsewhere for what is special about him.
I submit that it is his teachings that make him our "savior" and therefore the Christ. By teaching us how to live with one another, how to get along with another, he literally showed us how to avoid destroying ourselves. Thus, it is the teachings rather than the person that are the essential part of Christianity; we discover what those teachings are through the process I described above; and someone who follows and focuses on those teachings, rather than the corruption promoted by an uncritical reading of the New Testament or on the person of Jesus himself, that can properly be called a "Christian."
And where do you find the teachings? In the New Testament. Which renders your theory null.
How do you find the correct teachings amongst the nonsense? You wear your augmented reality truth-detecting cyberglasses, moron.





