Advertisement


by Prometheos » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:13 pm

by Conscentia » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:13 pm
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Norte Rico » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:13 pm

by Flat Beats » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:14 pm
Norstal wrote:Flat Beats wrote:Catholic, 'cause we have such a deep theology, and the general media is out to get us. So many lies are being taught about us (not just in the classroom, but also pop culture). I am faithful because I believe it is illogical to be otherwise, we have theology to answer some of the questions like the question of Evil etc.
I use this comparison a lot;
If you're right, and I am still faithful, then in the end it doesn't matter anyways, 'cause there's nothing for all eternity and what happened in my life wouldn't matter anyways. BUT, I led a peaceful and joy-filled life and probably made the world a better place.
If you're right, and I am not faithful, then in the end it wouldn't matter yadda yadda same as above. BUT, I led an 'exciting' life... but then again I have some... disadvantages (Family Research Council, personal experience, and other psychological research)
If I'm right, and I am faithful, it's all good.
If I'm right, and I am not faithful, it's just like, 'oh crap i'm screwed.'
This is just my opinion.
So I'm screwed because I deconverted from Catholics? What? Are the nuns going to beat me with a meter stick or something?

by Samuraikoku » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:15 pm
Norstal wrote:Now now Koku-chan, this is how it goes:
If Bluth is in thread then mention Christians have no god.
If Bluth is not in thread, then mention Christians have a god.
It's the only way to appease him.

by Dumb Ideologies » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:15 pm

by Norstal » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:15 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Norstal » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:17 pm
Flat Beats wrote:Norstal wrote:So I'm screwed because I deconverted from Catholics? What? Are the nuns going to beat me with a meter stick or something?
What? I don't even... (nuns are generally really nice people, put your prejudice aside.)
Why is your argument just ashamefulattempt at bashing me? (it worked however, as I know not how to respond)
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Flat Beats » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:20 pm
Norstal wrote:Flat Beats wrote:What? I don't even... (nuns are generally really nice people, put your prejudice aside.)
Why is your argument just ashamefulattempt at bashing me? (it worked however, as I know not how to respond)
It's ok, I didn't understand sarcasm when I was a Catholic too.
My point: Pascal's Wager fails. For all you know, you're actually worshiping the "bad guys", since there are so many possibilities in it. In other words, if I'm a good person and doesn't believe in any god, I could just go "oh, well."

by Bluth Corporation » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:29 pm
Actual Jesus, or the corruption of Jesus that the authors of the Gospels invented to justify their cult of the divinity of his person because they could not recognize the divinity of his teachings?
The evidence suggests it was actual Jesus. After all, that's why he got crucified.
You're assuming that if something is divine, then it is a god in the Abrahamic sense. That is simply not a valid assumption, at all.
Is there any other way you can define "divine"?
I'm attacking your argument because I believe your argument to be flawed. I have explained, to you as well as others, what Christianity means repeatedly in this thread and the other one. Everything I've already said on the topic doesn't just go out the window because it's a different subject or a few days later.
And yet you've still said nothing.

by Ifreann » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:45 pm
Flat Beats wrote:Norstal wrote:It's ok, I didn't understand sarcasm when I was a Catholic too.
My point: Pascal's Wager fails. For all you know, you're actually worshiping the "bad guys", since there are so many possibilities in it. In other words, if I'm a good person and doesn't believe in any god, I could just go "oh, well."
Well if that's the way the cookie crumbles, oh well, I took that good chance.

by Buffett and Colbert » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:47 pm

You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Buffett and Colbert » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:51 pm

You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Hydesland » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:03 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:How so?

by Samuraikoku » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:07 pm
Hydesland wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:How so?
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se ... rsion=NLT;
This is pretty core to Christianity. You can't accept this statement if you don't believe in God.

by Bluth Corporation » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:08 pm
Hydesland wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:How so?
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se ... rsion=NLT;
This is pretty core to Christianity.

by Buffett and Colbert » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:10 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Hydesland wrote:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se ... rsion=NLT;
This is pretty core to Christianity.
It's really not. In fact, it's antithetical to Christianity.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Hydesland » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:12 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Hydesland wrote:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se ... rsion=NLT;
This is pretty core to Christianity.
It's really not. In fact, it's antithetical to Christianity.

by Bluth Corporation » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:12 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:How exactly, is the New Testament antithetical to Christianity?
Instead of giving purposefully vague statements to attract attention, you could explain your position and enlighten us all.

by Samuraikoku » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:13 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Perhaps you could elaborate on this interesting opinion of yours? How exactly, is the New Testament antithetical to Christianity? Instead of giving purposefully vague statements to attract attention, you could explain your position and enlighten us all.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Based Illinois, Bovad, Cretanja, Cult of Silence, Destructive Government Economic System, Dimetrodon Empire, Fractalnavel, Ilova, Notanam, Reloviskistan, Spirit of Hope, Techocracy101010, The Jovannic, The Pirateariat, Thermodolia, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement