NationStates

Shaoyuan wrote:I might not know anything about you but you don't know anything about anything. So piss off. Leftard... who do you think you are?

When a government taxes their own people into poverty it's tyranny. When a government gives that tax money to those too lazy to work it's liberalism.

Shaoyuan wrote:Go fuck yourself.

When losing an argument, be sure to cuss out your opponent with no logics behind it. He's Mad, I can tell. *Trollface*

Tuskenjaar wrote:

Jagalonia wrote:Oh I love bush.....Oh you mean the president!? I'm sorry.

*sigh* I get sick of leftards hating on bush relentlessly. He was a decent man who tried to help his country while being castrated by the media for it. remember in 2007 it was like this:

2007 Leftard: OMG BUSH SUX!!! HES A KKK MEMBER AND HE WANTS TO EAT UR FAMILY DOG ON A DINNER PLATE! HE WRECKED OUR ECONOMY SINGLE HANDEDLY BLEUETETRGHE!!!! OBAMA WILL BE SOOOO MUCH BETTER!

2011 Leftard: WELL YOU ALL ARE RACIST WHO THINK OBAMA MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE I MEAN HOW COULD THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT DO AN SINGLE POSSIBLE THING WRONG WHILE IN OFICE U GUYZ ARE JUST A BUNCH OF RACIST KKK NEO NAZI SKINHEAD HITLER NAZIS!

Knock it off.

Augarundus wrote:

Valrez wrote:I believe in liberty!

Want to join a poor-kicking club?

You're not truly free unless you can kick the shit out of a poverty stricken beggar

Non-interventionism, nationalism, civil and economic liberty(including the right to sell yourself into slavery and otherwise), to a lesser extent political freedom and environmentalism.

readiness to fight for our country, strength, and making hostiles cringe at the thought of us

Tuskenjaar wrote:

Shaoyuan wrote:I might not know anything about you but you don't know anything about anything. So piss off. Leftard... who do you think you are?

When a government taxes their own people into poverty it's tyranny. When a government gives that tax money to those too lazy to work it's liberalism.

We saw your sig. And not everyone on welfare is lazy.

Intellect and valuing God.

1950's morals with 1970's / 80's dynamic focus!

They are a dogged people that work so hard!


lol.
and he was three days early to work!

Tuskenjaar wrote:

Shaoyuan wrote:Go fuck yourself.

When losing an argument, be sure to cuss out your opponent with no logics behind it. He's Mad, I can tell. *Trollface*

I think so. lol.

I would like to kindly remind people that this is for a respectful discussion and sharing of opinions, not fighting. Use of language is unnecessary- respect others and they will do the same

I stand for helping others, and treating people how I would want to be treated. Giving people help even when it's inconvenient for me. Cats.

Undisturbity wrote:I would like to kindly remind people that this is for a respectful discussion and sharing of opinions, not fighting. Use of language is unnecessary- respect others and they will do the same

Unfortunately not the case. But I am of your same opinion.

freedom and stuff

In my nation, people are able to say whatever they want, and do whatever they want unless they're hurting someone else or the environment. Small guns are allowed as long as you have a license because I believe that if you ban guns, only the criminals will have them.

The economy is mostly socialist. Corporations are banned, there are wage laws, there are state owned businesses, and unions are allowed. There is just enough economic freedom to keep the economy from collapsing.

Aalna wrote:In my nation, people are able to say whatever they want, and do whatever they want unless they're hurting someone else or the environment. Small guns are allowed as long as you have a license because I believe that if you ban guns, only the criminals will have them.

The economy is mostly socialist. Corporations are banned, there are wage laws, there are state owned businesses, and unions are allowed. There is just enough economic freedom to keep the economy from collapsing.

So, to you, everyone having a gun is better than just criminals? I suppose that makes sense, since they would need to defend themselves...

Nonetheless, I would not allow guns- although I support freedom to the highest degree, I support violence to the lowest. I think not allowing the manufacturing of guns and stopping gun smuggling would be effective methods of decreasing rthe risks of violence. We can't have violence in our nations, now, can we?

Mushet wrote:

Augarundus wrote:Want to join a poor-kicking club?

You're not truly free unless you can kick the shit out of a poverty stricken beggar

Son, that's the spirit!

Im amoral.

Undisturbity wrote:

Aalna wrote:In my nation, people are able to say whatever they want, and do whatever they want unless they're hurting someone else or the environment. Small guns are allowed as long as you have a license because I believe that if you ban guns, only the criminals will have them.

The economy is mostly socialist. Corporations are banned, there are wage laws, there are state owned businesses, and unions are allowed. There is just enough economic freedom to keep the economy from collapsing.

So, to you, everyone having a gun is better than just criminals? I suppose that makes sense, since they would need to defend themselves...

Nonetheless, I would not allow guns- although I support freedom to the highest degree, I support violence to the lowest. I think not allowing the manufacturing of guns and stopping gun smuggling would be effective methods of decreasing rthe risks of violence. We can't have violence in our nations, now, can we?

Option One: Waste a shit-ton of money busting every single arms-smuggling ring, or otherwise those few who get guns will rule the street
Option Two: Provide no restrictions on guns, causing gun crime to lower, for if everyone had a gun, no one would be stupid enough to try and kill someone who could easily kill them.
Selecting the second option gives your people freedom, allows the government to spend money on more pressing matters, and is generally a better deterrent to gun crime than option one.

Powerful capitalism with a light safety net. Powerful government, but generally outside of the business reach. Strong sense of cultural unity which can make or break the fortunes of individuals or companies, albeit not legally persecute them. Technocratic institutions with a moral oversight. Autocratic head of state *Who rarely does anything drastic* with democratic/meritocratic elections for lower offices. Very strong private sector tied in legally with the small, but powerful public sector. Very religious overall, with a strong and adaptive legal system and a very, very powerful army that focuses more on development than production.

Tuskenjaar wrote:

Shaoyuan wrote:I might not know anything about you but you don't know anything about anything. So piss off. Leftard... who do you think you are?

An Encyclopedia Dramatica User. Go to encyclopediadramatica.ch/Leftard for more info on leftards.

Shit didn't think it was mirrored.
Now that I have that bookmarked I will be reminiscing for awhile...

This all seems to be escalating into a very unfortunate hodgepodge of insults, where an intelligent political discussion should be... Oh well, I should've expected that.

Tagged

Not rocking the boat and making lots of money

Shaoyuan wrote:Go fuck yourself.

Splendid comeback.

Moving on:

Power to the wealthy, elitist aristocrats, to the incinerator with the peasantry.