NATION

PASSWORD

Naomi Campbell complains about 'racist' press ad

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Gravonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 850
Founded: Jul 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Naomi Campbell complains about 'racist' press ad

Postby Gravonia » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:07 am

Cadbury's pulls ad after racism claims

Cadbury has pulled a press ad created by advertising agency Fallon after supermodel Naomi Campbell suggested it was an openly racist attack against her.

See the ad here: http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/news/1072 ... sm-claims/

I saw the ad and only thought about her reputation as a pain in the arse and had to scroll down the article to find out that she objects to being compared to a chocolate bar which she thinks references the colour of her skin. Does anyone else here think that? I don't. It seems to me she's trying very hard to be offended and the ad is clearly referencing her diva reputation but then I'm a white man.

Maybe the diamonds the chocolate bar are lying on are a dig at the blood diamond she accepted from Liberian president Charles Taylor.
We in Gravonia have set our sights very low, so low in fact that even glory will have in it an echo of failure.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:12 am

Gravonia wrote:Cadbury has pulled a press ad created by advertising agency Fallon after supermodel Naomi Campbell suggested it was an openly racist attack against her.

:roll:

It seems to me she's trying very hard to be offended and the ad is clearly referencing her diva reputation

She's trying very hard to get some money, that's what she's after.
.

User avatar
Vellosia
Senator
 
Posts: 4278
Founded: May 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vellosia » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:14 am

PC has got out of control.
Back after a long break.

User avatar
Georgism
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9940
Founded: Mar 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Georgism » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:16 am

Political Correctness Gone Mad.
Georgism Factbook (including questions and answers)
¯\(°_o)/¯
Horsefish wrote:I agree with George

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:17 am

Vellosia wrote:PC has got out of control.

"PC" has nothing to do with it. This is just one celebrity making a stink for profit.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Vellosia
Senator
 
Posts: 4278
Founded: May 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vellosia » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:18 am

Bottle wrote:
Vellosia wrote:PC has got out of control.

"PC" has nothing to do with it. This is just one celebrity making a stink for profit.


You missed the point. The very fact she can go down that route shows how out of control PC has become.
Back after a long break.

User avatar
Georgism
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9940
Founded: Mar 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Georgism » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:19 am

Vellosia wrote:
Bottle wrote:"PC" has nothing to do with it. This is just one celebrity making a stink for profit.


You missed the point. The very fact she can go down that route shows how out of control PC has become.

I know, next they'll be telling us we can't even call her a dirty nigger whore any more
Georgism Factbook (including questions and answers)
¯\(°_o)/¯
Horsefish wrote:I agree with George

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:19 am

Vellosia wrote:PC has got out of control.

How so? Has a court ordered Cadbury's to pull it or did they do it themselves?

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:21 am

Vellosia wrote:
Bottle wrote:"PC" has nothing to do with it. This is just one celebrity making a stink for profit.


You missed the point. The very fact she can go down that route shows how out of control PC has become.

Down what route? No one has forced Cadbury's to do anything. And if they do, it's unlikely it will be over the ridiculous claim that it's a racist ad and rather that they're using her to advertise without permission. If a court were to rule in favor of Campbell in the first place.

User avatar
Vellosia
Senator
 
Posts: 4278
Founded: May 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vellosia » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:24 am

Laerod wrote:
Vellosia wrote:
You missed the point. The very fact she can go down that route shows how out of control PC has become.

Down what route? No one has forced Cadbury's to do anything. And if they do, it's unlikely it will be over the ridiculous claim that it's a racist ad and rather that they're using her to advertise without permission. If a court were to rule in favor of Campbell in the first place.


That she can claim the advertisment was racist on the most flimsy of grounds as an attempt to get what she wants. She probably would have kicked up a firestorm if they didn't pull it - one doesn't have to get a court order to make oneself heard. People far too easily resort to 'racist' label and the system allows them to do so.
Back after a long break.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:26 am

Vellosia wrote:
Laerod wrote:Down what route? No one has forced Cadbury's to do anything. And if they do, it's unlikely it will be over the ridiculous claim that it's a racist ad and rather that they're using her to advertise without permission. If a court were to rule in favor of Campbell in the first place.


That she can claim the advertisment was racist on the most flimsy of grounds as an attempt to get what she wants. She probably would have kicked up a firestorm if they didn't pull it - one doesn't have to get a court order to make oneself heard. People far too easily resort to 'racist' label and the system allows them to do so.

You still haven't shown how Cadbury's pulling the ad is an instance of PC rather than PR.

User avatar
Georgism
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9940
Founded: Mar 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Georgism » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:27 am

Laerod wrote:
Vellosia wrote:
That she can claim the advertisment was racist on the most flimsy of grounds as an attempt to get what she wants. She probably would have kicked up a firestorm if they didn't pull it - one doesn't have to get a court order to make oneself heard. People far too easily resort to 'racist' label and the system allows them to do so.

You still haven't shown how Cadbury's pulling the ad is an instance of PC rather than PR.

BECAUSE BLACK PEOPLE ARE INVOLVED

God I swear sometimes you people ask the stupidest questions
Georgism Factbook (including questions and answers)
¯\(°_o)/¯
Horsefish wrote:I agree with George

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:28 am

do black children get called "chocolate bar" on the playground in the UK?
whatever

User avatar
Georgism
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9940
Founded: Mar 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Georgism » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:30 am

Ashmoria wrote:do black children get called "chocolate bar" on the playground in the UK?

Not from memory, no. But I'm sure some do. We only had like two black kids at our entire school (both in our year) so y'know.
Georgism Factbook (including questions and answers)
¯\(°_o)/¯
Horsefish wrote:I agree with George

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:34 am

Hilarious. My vengeful Brummie self does like how Kraft are suffering for this, but my sensible Brummie self doesn't like how these ramifications could see Kraft economising by moving Cadbury off to Wysznegard or wherever.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
Gravonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 850
Founded: Jul 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Gravonia » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:40 am

Georgism wrote:
Laerod wrote:You still haven't shown how Cadbury's pulling the ad is an instance of PC rather than PR.

BECAUSE BLACK PEOPLE ARE INVOLVED

God I swear sometimes you people ask the stupidest questions



That's bullshit. Cadbury's have pulled the ad because it's easier than making a fuss over it and because it's part of a campaign, they've got other ads ready to replace it with. They don't have to pay to use her name and they haven't been ordered to take it down.
We in Gravonia have set our sights very low, so low in fact that even glory will have in it an echo of failure.

User avatar
Beinai
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 412
Founded: Jan 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Beinai » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:40 am

Cadbury's could probably shut her up with diamonds or 'dirty stones'. But seriously, there's only racial connotations if you look for them. I would never see that as racist. PC has gone too far. It's as ridiculous as when I got booed for saying brainstorm in class- apparently, it is now considered a reference to an epileptic fit.
Last edited by Beinai on Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-NATION INACTIVE-

User avatar
Gravonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 850
Founded: Jul 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Gravonia » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:42 am

Georgism wrote:Political Correctness Gone Mad.


There's no such thing as Political Correctness Gone Mad. If it's not correct then it's not Politically Correct

(edited for typo)
Last edited by Gravonia on Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
We in Gravonia have set our sights very low, so low in fact that even glory will have in it an echo of failure.

User avatar
SpectacularSpectacular
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 474
Founded: May 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SpectacularSpectacular » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:42 am

Laerod wrote:
Vellosia wrote:
That she can claim the advertisment was racist on the most flimsy of grounds as an attempt to get what she wants. She probably would have kicked up a firestorm if they didn't pull it - one doesn't have to get a court order to make oneself heard. People far too easily resort to 'racist' label and the system allows them to do so.

You still haven't shown how Cadbury's pulling the ad is an instance of PC rather than PR.


It would also cost them a fortune in court proceedings to contest her claim.
All life lessons can be found on Avenue Q.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:44 am

Georgism wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:do black children get called "chocolate bar" on the playground in the UK?

Not from memory, no. But I'm sure some do. We only had like two black kids at our entire school (both in our year) so y'know.


and is naomi campbell extremely famous as a diva in the UK?

the ad seems more than a little "off" to me but comparing a beautiful woman whose beauty is her fame to a delicous candybar isnt automatically offensive.
whatever

User avatar
Gravonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 850
Founded: Jul 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Gravonia » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:48 am

Anyway... rather than a discussion about the evils of political correctness.

Does anyone agree with her? Or at least see where she's coming from?
We in Gravonia have set our sights very low, so low in fact that even glory will have in it an echo of failure.

User avatar
Gravonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 850
Founded: Jul 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Gravonia » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:54 am

and is naomi campbell extremely famous as a diva in the UK?

the ad seems more than a little "off" to me but comparing a beautiful woman whose beauty is her fame to a delicous candybar isnt automatically offensive.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Camp ... ault_cases
We in Gravonia have set our sights very low, so low in fact that even glory will have in it an echo of failure.

User avatar
Georgism
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9940
Founded: Mar 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Georgism » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:54 am

Gravonia wrote:There's no such thing as Political Correctness Gone Mad.

But that is where you're wrong. For example when politicians in the UK banned the word 'Christmas', turned all the churches into mosques and replaced UK law with Sharia law so that we wouldn't offend the Muslamicists, or when they banned slavery so that it wouldn't hurt black people's feelings, it was Political Correctness Gone Mad.
Last edited by Georgism on Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Georgism Factbook (including questions and answers)
¯\(°_o)/¯
Horsefish wrote:I agree with George

User avatar
Gravonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 850
Founded: Jul 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Gravonia » Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:01 am

Georgism wrote:
Gravonia wrote:There's no such thing as Political Correctness Gone Mad.

But that is where you're wrong. For example when politicians in the UK banned the word 'Christmas', turned all the churches into mosques and replaced UK law with Sharia law so that we wouldn't offend the Muslamicists, or when they banned slavery so that it wouldn't hurt black people's feelings, it was Political Correctness Gone Mad.


That must have happened when I was on holiday as I missed it.

And if they happened then all apart from the last one would not be politically correct as the would be the wrong/incorrect thing to do.
We in Gravonia have set our sights very low, so low in fact that even glory will have in it an echo of failure.

User avatar
Galla-
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10835
Founded: Feb 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Galla- » Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:05 am

Vellosia wrote:
Laerod wrote:Down what route? No one has forced Cadbury's to do anything. And if they do, it's unlikely it will be over the ridiculous claim that it's a racist ad and rather that they're using her to advertise without permission. If a court were to rule in favor of Campbell in the first place.


That she can claim the advertisment was racist on the most flimsy of grounds as an attempt to get what she wants. She probably would have kicked up a firestorm if they didn't pull it - one doesn't have to get a court order to make oneself heard. People far too easily resort to 'racist' label and the system allows them to do so.


I could, somehow, twist these words into being offensive to my white, bleached, snow skin and yet I'd still not be able to win any money from you.

Oh look at me I'm a white Naomi Campbell, and I'm still not going to win any money in a court that doesn't laugh me out onto my arse.
Last edited by Galla- on Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hello humans. I am Sporekin, specifically a European Umber-Brown Puffball (or more formally, Lycoperdon umbrinum). Ask me anything.
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.

Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...

New Nicksyllvania - Unjustly Deleted 6/14/11

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Singaporen Empire, The Scandoslavic Empire

Advertisement

Remove ads