Advertisement
by Mature Related » Sun May 29, 2011 6:07 am
by Mercia-Northumbria » Sun May 29, 2011 6:08 am
Signoi wrote:a. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people."
by Herrebrugh » Sun May 29, 2011 6:20 am
Mature Related wrote:this dictionary ofcourse : http://www.conservapedia.com/Communism the one that has the most popular definitions.
by The Truth and Light » Sun May 29, 2011 6:30 am
Mature Related wrote:this dictionary ofcourse : http://www.conservapedia.com/Communism the one that has the most popular definitions.
by Threlizdun » Sun May 29, 2011 11:29 am
by New Rogernomics » Sun May 29, 2011 11:33 am
The Truth and Light wrote:Mature Related wrote:this dictionary ofcourse : http://www.conservapedia.com/Communism the one that has the most popular definitions.
Wow.
Conservapedia.
That's not biased at all!
by Unilisia » Sun May 29, 2011 11:34 am
Tiami wrote:I bow before the mighty Uni.
Lackadaisical2 wrote:If it shocked Uni, I know I don't want to read it.
You win.
Kylarnatia wrote:Steep hill + wheelchair + my lap - I think we know where that goes ;)
Katganistan wrote:That is fucking stupid.
L Ron Cupboard wrote:He appears to be propelling himself out of the flames with explosive diarrhea while his mother does jazz hands.
Mike the Progressive wrote:Because women are gods, men are pigs, and we, the males, deserve to all be castrated.
Neo Arcad wrote:Uni doesn't sleep. She waits.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Collector: "Why are these coins all sticky?"
by Agritum » Sun May 29, 2011 11:39 am
Unilisia wrote:Communism is perfect in writing, but impossible in practice. So you could be communist in writing, not in reality, which you would only be capable of vouching for.
by New Rogernomics » Sun May 29, 2011 11:44 am
by Agritum » Sun May 29, 2011 11:46 am
New Rogernomics wrote:Agritum wrote:I would add that a REAL communist state never existed,since Communism is stateless.
Anarchist Communism is stateless, traditional Communism aspires to a stateless society but does not put into practice aka Soviet Russia, Communist Cuba, and Communist China (before the 1970s reforms).
by Meryuma » Sun May 29, 2011 11:46 am
Threlizdun wrote:Meryuma wrote:
I'm pretty sure Juche isn't and I'm not sure if Titoism is. However, the rest, as disagreeable as they are, still have communism as the end goal and are thus communist.
They can represent a communist ideology, but are not communist in the since of how their society actually functions. However, their ideas of the vanguard party, educated elite running the affairs of the nation, and slaughtering those that disagree with them is pretty far from the goals of communism. Basically Leninism is the only ideology on that list that can sometimes meet those requirements though, even though I still never consider it communist myself, though the others all rejected that communism was possible, and instead said the state needed to exist forever to keep socialism.
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by New Rogernomics » Sun May 29, 2011 11:54 am
Agritum wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:Anarchist Communism is stateless, traditional Communism aspires to a stateless society but does not put into practice aka Soviet Russia, Communist Cuba, and Communist China (before the 1970s reforms).
of traditional communism,you mean the outdated marxist inspired communism?
by Greater Americania » Sun May 29, 2011 12:23 pm
Threlizdun wrote:They can represent a communist ideology, but are not communist in the since of how their society actually functions. However, their ideas of the vanguard party, educated elite running the affairs of the nation, and slaughtering those that disagree with them is pretty far from the goals of communism. Basically Leninism is the only ideology on that list that can sometimes meet those requirements though, even though I still never consider it communist myself, though the others all rejected that communism was possible, and instead said the state needed to exist forever to keep socialism.
by Natapoc » Sun May 29, 2011 12:23 pm
New Rogernomics wrote:Agritum wrote:I would add that a REAL communist state never existed,since Communism is stateless.
Anarchist Communism is stateless, traditional Communism aspires to a stateless society but does not put into practice aka Soviet Russia, Communist Cuba, and Communist China (before the 1970s reforms).
by New Rogernomics » Sun May 29, 2011 12:29 pm
Natapoc wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:Anarchist Communism is stateless, traditional Communism aspires to a stateless society but does not put into practice aka Soviet Russia, Communist Cuba, and Communist China (before the 1970s reforms).
Soviet russia called themselves socialist.
Cuba has never called themselves communist but rather socialist.
China has never called themselves communist but rather socialist.
Get the pattern? When people say "Communist Cuba" they are doing so incorrectly. I realize that your news media and especially talk show hosts will say things like that.
They are wrong. They are often wrong.
by Risna » Sun May 29, 2011 12:30 pm
Signoi wrote:for a long time playing this game i thought maybe my veiws were communist but if you look at what i says in the dictionary
"Communism
a. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people."
now then i dont know about you but i most certenly fit this description and i most certenly do nit have a planed economy so there
by New Huxlian Orwell » Sun May 29, 2011 12:40 pm
Imperium Neo Roma wrote:Lol, Communism. Bunch of repressed Teenagers hoping to achieve something that is beyond their grasps, or they just like forced labor, either works.
by GeneralHaNor » Sun May 29, 2011 12:44 pm
Mature Related wrote:Natapoc wrote:
Of course you are correct that not all communism is marxism. For example I'm not a marxist.
However all forms of communism are stateless and classless and have any means of production in common ownership.
If you disagree please find any recognized communist philosopher who argues differently. You will find that the vast majority of literature uses communism strictly in the sense of the word I've used here.
Actually I think you'll find the majority of literature defines communism as Pol Potism, Leninism, Maoism, Jungism, etc. All of it from recognized right-wing philospohers.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.
by Natapoc » Sun May 29, 2011 12:46 pm
New Rogernomics wrote:Natapoc wrote:
Soviet russia called themselves socialist.
Cuba has never called themselves communist but rather socialist.
China has never called themselves communist but rather socialist.
Get the pattern? When people say "Communist Cuba" they are doing so incorrectly. I realize that your news media and especially talk show hosts will say things like that.
They are wrong. They are often wrong.
A country can be communist and implement socialist policies, just as a social-democratic country can implement capitalist policies, and I don't live in the US so its your media and talk show hosts.
by GeneralHaNor » Sun May 29, 2011 12:48 pm
Natapoc wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:A country can be communist and implement socialist policies, just as a social-democratic country can implement capitalist policies, and I don't live in the US so its your media and talk show hosts.
Not my media. No. A state cannot by definition be communist. You can say otherwise all you like but you will be wrong every time because communism is defined as a stateless classless society and every state that has claimed to aspire to the goal of communism understood this and thus never called their state communist.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.
by New Huxlian Orwell » Sun May 29, 2011 12:48 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:Mature Related wrote:
Actually I think you'll find the majority of literature defines communism as Pol Potism, Leninism, Maoism, Jungism, etc. All of it from recognized right-wing philospohers.
There's your problem right there
The Right is not allowed to define terms that define the left., Banana =/= Shit, simply because you say so, or because that is sometimes what happens to Banana's
by GeneralHaNor » Sun May 29, 2011 12:51 pm
New Huxlian Orwell wrote:GeneralHaNor wrote:
There's your problem right there
The Right is not allowed to define terms that define the left., Banana =/= Shit, simply because you say so, or because that is sometimes what happens to Banana's
Well, they certainly try to. They also like to throw around huge numbers of supposed dead killed by communism, without any urge to cite any kind of proof.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.
by New Huxlian Orwell » Sun May 29, 2011 12:51 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:Natapoc wrote:
Not my media. No. A state cannot by definition be communist. You can say otherwise all you like but you will be wrong every time because communism is defined as a stateless classless society and every state that has claimed to aspire to the goal of communism understood this and thus never called their state communist.
However (devil's advocate time) they were ran by parties that called themselves Communist
by New Huxlian Orwell » Sun May 29, 2011 12:53 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:New Huxlian Orwell wrote:Well, they certainly try to. They also like to throw around huge numbers of supposed dead killed by communism, without any urge to cite any kind of proof.
Meh, those deaths did happen, and in quite large numbers, by states that aspired to those ideals, It should at least serve as a lesson of sorts
by GeneralHaNor » Sun May 29, 2011 12:53 pm
New Huxlian Orwell wrote:GeneralHaNor wrote:
However (devil's advocate time) they were ran by parties that called themselves Communist
If a country cannot call itself communist because it has not yet achieved communism, then there are no communists in the world because they do not live in a communist society. The point is they are trying to achieve communism.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Barinive, DataDyneIrkenAlliance, Google [Bot], Kastopoli Salegliari, Shrillland, Southland
Advertisement