NATION

PASSWORD

am i comunist

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Mature Related
Envoy
 
Posts: 337
Founded: Apr 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mature Related » Sun May 29, 2011 6:07 am

this dictionary ofcourse : http://www.conservapedia.com/Communism the one that has the most popular definitions.

User avatar
Mercia-Northumbria
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 124
Founded: Dec 04, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mercia-Northumbria » Sun May 29, 2011 6:08 am

Signoi wrote:a. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people."


What kind of definition is that? Just because that is what happened in the USSR doesn't mean that "a single authoritarian party holds power and only claims to make progress blah blah blah" is what communist theory is all about.

User avatar
Herrebrugh
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15205
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Herrebrugh » Sun May 29, 2011 6:20 am

Mature Related wrote:this dictionary ofcourse : http://www.conservapedia.com/Communism the one that has the most popular definitions.


Wow. The first thing I saw when entering the Socialism page was Hitler O.o

Those guys are so incredibly smart :roll:
Uyt naem Zijner Majeſteyt Jozef III, bij de gratie Godts, Koningh der Herrebrugheylanden, Prins van Rheda, Heer van Jozefslandt, enz. enz. enz.
Im Namen Seiner Majeſtät Joſeph III., von Gottes Gnaden König der Herrenbrückinſeln, Prinz von Rheda, Herr von Josephsland etc. etc. etc.


The Factbook of the Kingdom of the Herrebrugh Islands
Where the Website-Style Factbook Originated!

User avatar
The Truth and Light
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29396
Founded: Jan 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Truth and Light » Sun May 29, 2011 6:30 am

Mature Related wrote:this dictionary ofcourse : http://www.conservapedia.com/Communism the one that has the most popular definitions.

Wow.

Conservapedia.

That's not biased at all!

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sun May 29, 2011 11:29 am

Meryuma wrote:
Threlizdun wrote: Leninism, Stalinism, Maoism, Juche, Titoism, Castroism and other such ideologies are not communist


I'm pretty sure Juche isn't and I'm not sure if Titoism is. However, the rest, as disagreeable as they are, still have communism as the end goal and are thus communist.

They can represent a communist ideology, but are not communist in the since of how their society actually functions. However, their ideas of the vanguard party, educated elite running the affairs of the nation, and slaughtering those that disagree with them is pretty far from the goals of communism. Basically Leninism is the only ideology on that list that can sometimes meet those requirements though, even though I still never consider it communist myself, though the others all rejected that communism was possible, and instead said the state needed to exist forever to keep socialism.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
New Rogernomics
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9510
Founded: Aug 22, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby New Rogernomics » Sun May 29, 2011 11:33 am

The Truth and Light wrote:
Mature Related wrote:this dictionary ofcourse : http://www.conservapedia.com/Communism the one that has the most popular definitions.

Wow.

Conservapedia.

That's not biased at all!

It lowers you're IQ if you read it for more than 5 minutes. :palm:
Herald (Vice-Delegate) of Lazarus
"Solidarity forever..."
Hoping for Peace in Israel and Palestine
  • Former First Citizen (PM) of Lazarus
  • Former Proedroi (Minister) of Foreign Affairs of Lazarus
  • Former Lazarus Delegate (Humane Republic of Lazarus, 2015)
  • Minister of Culture & Media (Humane Republic of Lazarus)
  • Foreign Minister of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Senator of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Interior Commissioner of Lazarus (Pre-People's Republic of Lazarus)
  • At some point a member of the Grey family...then father vanished...
  • Foreign Minister of The Last Kingdom (RIP)
  • ADN:DSA Rep for Eastern Roman Empire
  • Honoratus Servant of the Holy Land (Eastern Roman Empire)
  • UN/WA Delegate of Trans Atlantice (RIP)

User avatar
Unilisia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12053
Founded: May 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unilisia » Sun May 29, 2011 11:34 am

Communism is perfect in writing, but impossible in practice. So you could be communist in writing, not in reality, which you would only be capable of vouching for.
I am the mighty Uni.

Tiami wrote:I bow before the mighty Uni.

Lackadaisical2 wrote:If it shocked Uni, I know I don't want to read it.
You win.

Kylarnatia wrote:Steep hill + wheelchair + my lap - I think we know where that goes ;)

Katganistan wrote:That is fucking stupid.

L Ron Cupboard wrote:He appears to be propelling himself out of the flames with explosive diarrhea while his mother does jazz hands.

Mike the Progressive wrote:Because women are gods, men are pigs, and we, the males, deserve to all be castrated.

Neo Arcad wrote:Uni doesn't sleep. She waits.

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Collector: "Why are these coins all sticky?"

User avatar
Agritum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22161
Founded: May 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Agritum » Sun May 29, 2011 11:39 am

Unilisia wrote:Communism is perfect in writing, but impossible in practice. So you could be communist in writing, not in reality, which you would only be capable of vouching for.

I would add that a REAL communist state never existed,since Communism is stateless.

User avatar
New Rogernomics
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9510
Founded: Aug 22, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby New Rogernomics » Sun May 29, 2011 11:44 am

Agritum wrote:
Unilisia wrote:Communism is perfect in writing, but impossible in practice. So you could be communist in writing, not in reality, which you would only be capable of vouching for.

I would add that a REAL communist state never existed,since Communism is stateless.

Anarchist Communism is stateless, traditional Communism aspires to a stateless society but does not put into practice aka Soviet Russia, Communist Cuba, and Communist China (before the 1970s reforms).
Herald (Vice-Delegate) of Lazarus
"Solidarity forever..."
Hoping for Peace in Israel and Palestine
  • Former First Citizen (PM) of Lazarus
  • Former Proedroi (Minister) of Foreign Affairs of Lazarus
  • Former Lazarus Delegate (Humane Republic of Lazarus, 2015)
  • Minister of Culture & Media (Humane Republic of Lazarus)
  • Foreign Minister of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Senator of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Interior Commissioner of Lazarus (Pre-People's Republic of Lazarus)
  • At some point a member of the Grey family...then father vanished...
  • Foreign Minister of The Last Kingdom (RIP)
  • ADN:DSA Rep for Eastern Roman Empire
  • Honoratus Servant of the Holy Land (Eastern Roman Empire)
  • UN/WA Delegate of Trans Atlantice (RIP)

User avatar
Agritum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22161
Founded: May 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Agritum » Sun May 29, 2011 11:46 am

New Rogernomics wrote:
Agritum wrote:I would add that a REAL communist state never existed,since Communism is stateless.

Anarchist Communism is stateless, traditional Communism aspires to a stateless society but does not put into practice aka Soviet Russia, Communist Cuba, and Communist China (before the 1970s reforms).


of traditional communism,you mean the outdated marxist inspired communism?

User avatar
Meryuma
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14922
Founded: Jul 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meryuma » Sun May 29, 2011 11:46 am

Threlizdun wrote:
Meryuma wrote:
I'm pretty sure Juche isn't and I'm not sure if Titoism is. However, the rest, as disagreeable as they are, still have communism as the end goal and are thus communist.

They can represent a communist ideology, but are not communist in the since of how their society actually functions. However, their ideas of the vanguard party, educated elite running the affairs of the nation, and slaughtering those that disagree with them is pretty far from the goals of communism. Basically Leninism is the only ideology on that list that can sometimes meet those requirements though, even though I still never consider it communist myself, though the others all rejected that communism was possible, and instead said the state needed to exist forever to keep socialism.


Actually, all the Leninist ideologies think they're working towards communism.
ᛋᛃᚢ - Social Justice Úlfheðinn
Potarius wrote:
Neo Arcad wrote:Gravity is a natural phenomenon by which physical bodies attract with a force proportional to their mass.


In layman's terms, orgy time.


Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.


Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."


Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.



Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.

Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...

*puts on sunglasses*

blow out of proportions."

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

...so here's your future

User avatar
New Rogernomics
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9510
Founded: Aug 22, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby New Rogernomics » Sun May 29, 2011 11:54 am

Agritum wrote:
New Rogernomics wrote:Anarchist Communism is stateless, traditional Communism aspires to a stateless society but does not put into practice aka Soviet Russia, Communist Cuba, and Communist China (before the 1970s reforms).


of traditional communism,you mean the outdated marxist inspired communism?

Yep.
Herald (Vice-Delegate) of Lazarus
"Solidarity forever..."
Hoping for Peace in Israel and Palestine
  • Former First Citizen (PM) of Lazarus
  • Former Proedroi (Minister) of Foreign Affairs of Lazarus
  • Former Lazarus Delegate (Humane Republic of Lazarus, 2015)
  • Minister of Culture & Media (Humane Republic of Lazarus)
  • Foreign Minister of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Senator of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Interior Commissioner of Lazarus (Pre-People's Republic of Lazarus)
  • At some point a member of the Grey family...then father vanished...
  • Foreign Minister of The Last Kingdom (RIP)
  • ADN:DSA Rep for Eastern Roman Empire
  • Honoratus Servant of the Holy Land (Eastern Roman Empire)
  • UN/WA Delegate of Trans Atlantice (RIP)

User avatar
Greater Americania
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6313
Founded: Sep 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Americania » Sun May 29, 2011 12:23 pm

Threlizdun wrote:They can represent a communist ideology, but are not communist in the since of how their society actually functions. However, their ideas of the vanguard party, educated elite running the affairs of the nation, and slaughtering those that disagree with them is pretty far from the goals of communism. Basically Leninism is the only ideology on that list that can sometimes meet those requirements though, even though I still never consider it communist myself, though the others all rejected that communism was possible, and instead said the state needed to exist forever to keep socialism.


Where do you leftists come up with this? Communism is not a status. It is not something to "work towards". The moment you believe in it, you are Communist. The moment a nation comes under the power of those who believe in Communism, the nation becomes Communist. Smashing enemies of the "proletariat revolution" was always a goal of Communists. Leninists just understood that if they immediately dissolved the state and class differences, their society would collapse because it was not ready for that. Thus, Communist Totalitarianism was born.

These ideas that Communism has never been practiced are nothing more that neo-leftist propaganda, aimed at both granting acceptance to Communism in modern society, and in attempting to bridge the gap between Socialism and moderate liberalism. They have no basis in fact or historical Communist theory. They are a a mixture of Western individualism and traditional Marxism.
Federal Republic of Greater Americania: “Liberty, Soveriegnty, Freedom!”
Original Founder of the Nationalist Union
Member of the Santiago Anti-Communist Treaty Organization

Nationalist Republic, governed by the National Republican Party
Economic Left/Right: 2.0, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.21
President: Austin Farley
Vice President: John Raimark
Secretary of State: Jason Lee
Secretary of Defense: Shane Tomlinson
Secretary of Federal Security: Ross Ferrell
-Chief of Interior Security Forces: General James Calley
Secretary of Territorial Administration: Brandon Terry
-Governor of Tlozuk: Jarod Harris
-Governor of Comaack: John Fargo
*Territories are foreign nations which have been annexed by the Federal Republic

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Sun May 29, 2011 12:23 pm

New Rogernomics wrote:
Agritum wrote:I would add that a REAL communist state never existed,since Communism is stateless.

Anarchist Communism is stateless, traditional Communism aspires to a stateless society but does not put into practice aka Soviet Russia, Communist Cuba, and Communist China (before the 1970s reforms).



Soviet russia called themselves socialist.
Cuba has never called themselves communist but rather socialist.
China has never called themselves communist but rather socialist.

Get the pattern? When people say "Communist Cuba" they are doing so incorrectly. I realize that your news media and especially talk show hosts will say things like that.

They are wrong. They are often wrong.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
New Rogernomics
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9510
Founded: Aug 22, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby New Rogernomics » Sun May 29, 2011 12:29 pm

Natapoc wrote:
New Rogernomics wrote:Anarchist Communism is stateless, traditional Communism aspires to a stateless society but does not put into practice aka Soviet Russia, Communist Cuba, and Communist China (before the 1970s reforms).



Soviet russia called themselves socialist.
Cuba has never called themselves communist but rather socialist.
China has never called themselves communist but rather socialist.

Get the pattern? When people say "Communist Cuba" they are doing so incorrectly. I realize that your news media and especially talk show hosts will say things like that.

They are wrong. They are often wrong.

A country can be communist and implement socialist policies, just as a social-democratic country can implement capitalist policies, and I don't live in the US so its your media and talk show hosts.
Herald (Vice-Delegate) of Lazarus
"Solidarity forever..."
Hoping for Peace in Israel and Palestine
  • Former First Citizen (PM) of Lazarus
  • Former Proedroi (Minister) of Foreign Affairs of Lazarus
  • Former Lazarus Delegate (Humane Republic of Lazarus, 2015)
  • Minister of Culture & Media (Humane Republic of Lazarus)
  • Foreign Minister of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Senator of The Ascendancy (RIP, and purged)
  • Interior Commissioner of Lazarus (Pre-People's Republic of Lazarus)
  • At some point a member of the Grey family...then father vanished...
  • Foreign Minister of The Last Kingdom (RIP)
  • ADN:DSA Rep for Eastern Roman Empire
  • Honoratus Servant of the Holy Land (Eastern Roman Empire)
  • UN/WA Delegate of Trans Atlantice (RIP)

User avatar
Risna
Diplomat
 
Posts: 737
Founded: Feb 24, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Risna » Sun May 29, 2011 12:30 pm

Signoi wrote:for a long time playing this game i thought maybe my veiws were communist but if you look at what i says in the dictionary
"Communism
a. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people."
now then i dont know about you but i most certenly fit this description and i most certenly do nit have a planed economy so there

congratulations you'r a communist! You get a cookie!
http://www.techbusy.org/wp-content/uplo ... cookie.gif
”Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly. “
GENERATION 30: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

User avatar
New Huxlian Orwell
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 400
Founded: Jun 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Huxlian Orwell » Sun May 29, 2011 12:40 pm

Imperium Neo Roma wrote:Lol, Communism. Bunch of repressed Teenagers hoping to achieve something that is beyond their grasps, or they just like forced labor, either works.

Shouldn't you be putting "Proudly not donating one cent to Joplin, Mo" in your sig now? You're certainly not suited for political conversation.
If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now.

You live and learn. At any rate, you live. ~Douglas Adams

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Sun May 29, 2011 12:44 pm

Mature Related wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
Of course you are correct that not all communism is marxism. For example I'm not a marxist.

However all forms of communism are stateless and classless and have any means of production in common ownership.

If you disagree please find any recognized communist philosopher who argues differently. You will find that the vast majority of literature uses communism strictly in the sense of the word I've used here.


Actually I think you'll find the majority of literature defines communism as Pol Potism, Leninism, Maoism, Jungism, etc. All of it from recognized right-wing philospohers.



There's your problem right there

The Right is not allowed to define terms that define the left., Banana =/= Shit, simply because you say so, or because that is sometimes what happens to Banana's
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Sun May 29, 2011 12:46 pm

New Rogernomics wrote:
Natapoc wrote:

Soviet russia called themselves socialist.
Cuba has never called themselves communist but rather socialist.
China has never called themselves communist but rather socialist.

Get the pattern? When people say "Communist Cuba" they are doing so incorrectly. I realize that your news media and especially talk show hosts will say things like that.

They are wrong. They are often wrong.

A country can be communist and implement socialist policies, just as a social-democratic country can implement capitalist policies, and I don't live in the US so its your media and talk show hosts.


Not my media. No. A state cannot by definition be communist. You can say otherwise all you like but you will be wrong every time because communism is defined as a stateless classless society and every state that has claimed to aspire to the goal of communism understood this and thus never called their state communist.
Last edited by Natapoc on Sun May 29, 2011 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Sun May 29, 2011 12:48 pm

Natapoc wrote:
New Rogernomics wrote:A country can be communist and implement socialist policies, just as a social-democratic country can implement capitalist policies, and I don't live in the US so its your media and talk show hosts.


Not my media. No. A state cannot by definition be communist. You can say otherwise all you like but you will be wrong every time because communism is defined as a stateless classless society and every state that has claimed to aspire to the goal of communism understood this and thus never called their state communist.


However (devil's advocate time) they were ran by parties that called themselves Communist
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
New Huxlian Orwell
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 400
Founded: Jun 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Huxlian Orwell » Sun May 29, 2011 12:48 pm

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Mature Related wrote:
Actually I think you'll find the majority of literature defines communism as Pol Potism, Leninism, Maoism, Jungism, etc. All of it from recognized right-wing philospohers.



There's your problem right there

The Right is not allowed to define terms that define the left., Banana =/= Shit, simply because you say so, or because that is sometimes what happens to Banana's

Well, they certainly try to. They also like to throw around huge numbers of supposed dead killed by communism, without any urge to cite any kind of proof.
If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now.

You live and learn. At any rate, you live. ~Douglas Adams

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Sun May 29, 2011 12:51 pm

New Huxlian Orwell wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:

There's your problem right there

The Right is not allowed to define terms that define the left., Banana =/= Shit, simply because you say so, or because that is sometimes what happens to Banana's

Well, they certainly try to. They also like to throw around huge numbers of supposed dead killed by communism, without any urge to cite any kind of proof.


Meh, those deaths did happen, and in quite large numbers, by states that aspired to those ideals, It should at least serve as a lesson of sorts
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
New Huxlian Orwell
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 400
Founded: Jun 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Huxlian Orwell » Sun May 29, 2011 12:51 pm

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
Not my media. No. A state cannot by definition be communist. You can say otherwise all you like but you will be wrong every time because communism is defined as a stateless classless society and every state that has claimed to aspire to the goal of communism understood this and thus never called their state communist.


However (devil's advocate time) they were ran by parties that called themselves Communist

If a country cannot call itself communist because it has not yet achieved communism, then there are no communists in the world because they do not live in a communist society. The point is they are trying to achieve communism.
If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now.

You live and learn. At any rate, you live. ~Douglas Adams

User avatar
New Huxlian Orwell
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 400
Founded: Jun 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Huxlian Orwell » Sun May 29, 2011 12:53 pm

GeneralHaNor wrote:
New Huxlian Orwell wrote:Well, they certainly try to. They also like to throw around huge numbers of supposed dead killed by communism, without any urge to cite any kind of proof.


Meh, those deaths did happen, and in quite large numbers, by states that aspired to those ideals, It should at least serve as a lesson of sorts

Some of them did, some of them didn't. For example, blaming a famine all on a government is ridiculous. The government doesn't control the damn weather. The numbers are made up, and used as a bludgeon for those who are unable to actually argue political theory.
If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now.

You live and learn. At any rate, you live. ~Douglas Adams

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Sun May 29, 2011 12:53 pm

New Huxlian Orwell wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
However (devil's advocate time) they were ran by parties that called themselves Communist

If a country cannot call itself communist because it has not yet achieved communism, then there are no communists in the world because they do not live in a communist society. The point is they are trying to achieve communism.


By your logic, Obama is White
I happen to agree
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Barinive, DataDyneIrkenAlliance, Google [Bot], Kastopoli Salegliari, Shrillland, Southland

Advertisement

Remove ads