They are sentient.
Advertisement

by Keronians » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:27 pm

by Luciratus » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:28 pm

by Demen » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:41 pm
Luciratus wrote:Keronians wrote:
They are sentient.
So? Why specifically does sentience mean anything? What meaning does life have?
Edit: Also, most pro-choice individuals believe that life has full significance only so long as sapience and sentience are properties of the organism in question. Thus, mere sentience cannot possibly justify me caring too much about somebody else's life. If they particularly vexed me, why shouldn't I destroy them like I would crush a fly or kill fish? Then, I can sup.
Edit2: My apologies if I seem asinine. However, I do feel especially nihilistic presently. Likewise, I truly am interested in discovering why precisely we should use birth as a limit for abortion. Why not cut it off at six months into pregnancy or five years into life?

by Wiztopia » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:57 pm
Demen wrote:Luciratus wrote:
Oh, why ever not?
"Parasitism is a type of symbiotic relationship between organisms of different species where one organism, the parasite, benefits at the expense of the other, the host."
Likewise, I think you mischaracterized me. I do not merely detest children; I am a misanthrope.
And this is where I fire my IGNORE cannons.
But first, I must ask you something. How would you feel if right now, every child on earth died?


by Kazomal » Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:45 pm

by Libertarian Mesa » Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:51 pm

by Wiztopia » Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:52 pm
Kazomal wrote:Wiztopia wrote:
A fetus is not a baby. Thank you, come again.
Those are just words. The thing that is in the womb is physically the same thing that exits the vagina, and it has grown and changed form significantly since it started as a separate sperm and egg. By the time it is near the end of the pregnancy, it is much closer to a baby that it is to it's form a few weeks into the pregnancy.
By the by, where would you cut off legal abortion? End of the second trimester? Beginning of birth? Completion of birth? Before first breath? Some time after that?

by Galloism » Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:56 pm

by Galloism » Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:00 pm

by Kazomal » Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:05 pm
Wiztopia wrote:Kazomal wrote:
Those are just words. The thing that is in the womb is physically the same thing that exits the vagina, and it has grown and changed form significantly since it started as a separate sperm and egg. By the time it is near the end of the pregnancy, it is much closer to a baby that it is to it's form a few weeks into the pregnancy.
By the by, where would you cut off legal abortion? End of the second trimester? Beginning of birth? Completion of birth? Before first breath? Some time after that?
No it isn't.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... ic_sac.jpg
http://acne.savvy-cafe.com/wp-content/u ... aby-rs.jpg
Never. A woman only gets an abortion in the third trimester if their health is in danger.

by Brandenburg-Altmark » Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:45 pm
Kazomal wrote:Wiztopia wrote:
No it isn't.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... ic_sac.jpg
http://acne.savvy-cafe.com/wp-content/u ... aby-rs.jpg
Never. A woman only gets an abortion in the third trimester if their health is in danger.
No it isn't what?
Physically the same object? Yeah, it sure is.
Closer, at 28 weeks, to a 5 second newborn baby than it is to a zygot or embryo? Yeah, it sure is. Although I guess this is opinion.
So, just to be clear, you're in favor of legal elective abortion in the third trimester, should a woman want it, for some reason or another not related to health? (I'm not arguing against you here, I'm just trying to clarify your position). Also, could you define "never?' Is it beginning of birth, completion of birth, before first breath, some time after, before, between, or not specified?

by Kazomal » Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:33 pm
Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:Kazomal wrote:
No it isn't what?
Physically the same object? Yeah, it sure is.
Closer, at 28 weeks, to a 5 second newborn baby than it is to a zygot or embryo? Yeah, it sure is. Although I guess this is opinion.
So, just to be clear, you're in favor of legal elective abortion in the third trimester, should a woman want it, for some reason or another not related to health? (I'm not arguing against you here, I'm just trying to clarify your position). Also, could you define "never?' Is it beginning of birth, completion of birth, before first breath, some time after, before, between, or not specified?
Here's the thing; it is not the fetus's body to control. If a woman decides she no longer wants to carry a pregnancy, what are you going to do to stop her? Would you force me to give you my kidney if you really wanted it and I backed out of the deal at the last minute?

by Libertarian Mesa » Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:42 pm

by Bitchkitten » Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:46 pm

by Libertarian Mesa » Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:50 pm

by Wikipedia and Universe » Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:53 pm

An ODECON Naval Analyst wrote:Superior tactics and training can in fact triumph over force of numbers and missile spam.
Bottle wrote:This is not rocket surgery, folks.
Senestrum wrote:This is relativity, the theory that takes everything we know about the world, bends it over, and fucks it to death with a spiked dildo.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, Bovad, Cannot think of a name, Fractalnavel, Restructured Russia, Saiwana, Senscaria, The Sherpa Empire
Advertisement