You can do that with very specialized balloons. In fact, with this, you don't even need to cry afterwards!
Advertisement

by Norstal » Tue May 31, 2011 7:38 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Geniasis » Tue May 31, 2011 7:39 pm
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by Galloism » Tue May 31, 2011 7:40 pm


by Samuraikoku » Tue May 31, 2011 7:40 pm

by Geniasis » Tue May 31, 2011 7:41 pm
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by Kaputer » Tue May 31, 2011 7:44 pm

by Norstal » Tue May 31, 2011 7:45 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Geniasis » Tue May 31, 2011 7:51 pm
Norstal wrote:Well, you see, when a man gets very desperate and sexually deprived, he goes to his local XXX store. In there, he will find a huge mockup of a coke can. He buys the can, takes it home, and open the lid thing. In it, there will be a lubricated hole in which you put your wee-wee in forward-backward thrust motion for minutes on end.
Yeah, I actually found one of those in a store.
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by Brandenburg-Altmark » Tue May 31, 2011 7:53 pm
Kaputer wrote:Damn her rape supporting father for introducing this bit** into the world.

by Wikipedia and Universe » Tue May 31, 2011 8:25 pm
*searches user's posts for the word "sex"*
An ODECON Naval Analyst wrote:Superior tactics and training can in fact triumph over force of numbers and missile spam.
Bottle wrote:This is not rocket surgery, folks.
Senestrum wrote:This is relativity, the theory that takes everything we know about the world, bends it over, and fucks it to death with a spiked dildo.

by Person012345 » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:00 am
The Chaos Heart wrote:Person012345 wrote:Two things.
1. No it isn't.
2. Even if it is, it doesn't say "believes that women should do their duty" it says "believes a woman's sexual, emotional, etc. wellbeing is subordinate to a man's". Try and follow, this means that if a man wants sex with a woman, and she doesn't want it, he would have every right to take it from her consenting or not. Because his desires are more important than hers.
1. Prove it then, itnstead of simply denying things.
2. Which makes it enherently their duty to serve men. See? LOGIC.
And the fact that you think forcing yourself and concent are the same thing is laughable.
The problem with Eve, once again, is that she words things far too broadly, most likely in an attempt to encompass more of the male sex, emphasizing her hatred of men, while sacrificing basic logic. Taking her statament as it is and factoring in all possible situations it may encompass, this would mean that any society that has ever thought that men are leaders, regardless of their actual feelings towwards the crime of rape, are rape supporters.
Thus we come to the conclusioon that Eve is crazy and doesn't know what the fuck she's talking about.
I should hope, in the future, you get a better grasp on how serious rape is, and realize how offensive this list is to actual rape victims. I also hope you realize how terrible flawed Eve;s points are and, if you think there is some bits of her points that are worth noting, try and surpass her, in actually making her points debatable. As it stands, Eve is too broadly worded, and makes huge jumps in logic that do not flow. As was her intention, as noted by the snarky remark at the end of her post. She's nothing more than someone who has an intense hatred for men (or a troll), and created this list without putting much thought into it, to simply and try to encompass as much of the male population as possible. Nothing more, nothing less.

by The Chaos Heart » Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:24 pm
Person012345 wrote:The Chaos Heart wrote:
1. Prove it then, itnstead of simply denying things.
2. Which makes it enherently their duty to serve men. See? LOGIC.
And the fact that you think forcing yourself and concent are the same thing is laughable.
The problem with Eve, once again, is that she words things far too broadly, most likely in an attempt to encompass more of the male sex, emphasizing her hatred of men, while sacrificing basic logic. Taking her statament as it is and factoring in all possible situations it may encompass, this would mean that any society that has ever thought that men are leaders, regardless of their actual feelings towwards the crime of rape, are rape supporters.
Thus we come to the conclusioon that Eve is crazy and doesn't know what the fuck she's talking about.
I should hope, in the future, you get a better grasp on how serious rape is, and realize how offensive this list is to actual rape victims. I also hope you realize how terrible flawed Eve;s points are and, if you think there is some bits of her points that are worth noting, try and surpass her, in actually making her points debatable. As it stands, Eve is too broadly worded, and makes huge jumps in logic that do not flow. As was her intention, as noted by the snarky remark at the end of her post. She's nothing more than someone who has an intense hatred for men (or a troll), and created this list without putting much thought into it, to simply and try to encompass as much of the male population as possible. Nothing more, nothing less.
I believe I have proven my point well enough, and that you won't really listen to anyone else anyway regardless of the facts, thus I won't pursue this line of conversation further (because I would just be saying the exact same thing over and over).
Glad to know you wanted oh so many pages just to come and say that. ^_^
by The Chaos Heart » Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:24 pm
Norstal wrote:The Chaos Heart wrote:
Reproduction is irrational?
I mean...damn...I'm asexual, but even I can recognize the importance of a species having sex. Irrational? Where do you get that logic?
It is irrational when relating to nature. There's no sense in having sex just to reproduce. Why'd you reproduce? There's no end to it. No goal to achieve. Nothing whatsoever.
It is rational when relating human progression. We need more people to discover more stuff, to make more stuff, etc. But even that gets irrational when you think about it.

by Samuraikoku » Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:27 pm
The Chaos Heart wrote:Norstal wrote:It is irrational when relating to nature. There's no sense in having sex just to reproduce. Why'd you reproduce? There's no end to it. No goal to achieve. Nothing whatsoever.
It is rational when relating human progression. We need more people to discover more stuff, to make more stuff, etc. But even that gets irrational when you think about it.
...no...it doesn't. The preservation of a species is irrational? Continuing life is irrational?

by The Chaos Heart » Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:29 pm
1. Not logical or reasonable
2. Not endowed with the power of reason

by Samuraikoku » Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:30 pm
The Chaos Heart wrote:Samuraikoku wrote:
Yes, it's irrational. It's a survival instinct. Hence animal reproduction. And us humans can't help being animals.
I think you need a check up on the definition of irrational1. Not logical or reasonable
2. Not endowed with the power of reason
So, reproduction is illogical? It's not reasonable? Do tell.

by Papayastan » Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:35 pm

by The Chaos Heart » Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:45 pm
Samuraikoku wrote:The Chaos Heart wrote:
I think you need a check up on the definition of irrational
So, reproduction is illogical? It's not reasonable? Do tell.
Not endowed with the power of reason is the correct definition there, smart guy. Animals don't reason "I'm going to reproduce to keep the species alive.". It's an instinct, already embedded in their natural programming.

by Keronians » Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:51 pm
Papayastan wrote:Fantasizing about a woman is rape unless you have her real-life, actual consent to do so.

by Dyakovo » Wed Jun 01, 2011 3:25 pm

by Geniasis » Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:04 pm
Papayastan wrote:Fantasizing about a woman is rape unless you have her real-life, actual consent to do so.
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by Samuraikoku » Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:45 pm
The Chaos Heart wrote:Both are definitions provided, therefore, both have merit.
Have you heard of multiple definitions? There's a reason why they exist. They serve different purposes.The Chaos Heart wrote:And even if you want, for your connivance, to disregard the first definition, you still make no sense. And we're talking about human beings here which, while we are technically animals, are a bit beyond your garden variety sloth.
So human beings never think "let's have children"? Riiiiiiight.
Further more, creatures do not think to breathe. By your definition, is it also irrational to breathe?

by Samuraikoku » Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:48 pm
Papayastan wrote:Fantasizing about a woman is rape unless you have her real-life, actual consent to do so.

by Unhealthy2 » Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:01 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Angvar, Cannot think of a name, Eahland, Grinning Dragon, Mearisse, New Ciencia, Old Temecula, Rusozak, The Pirateariat, Valrifall, Vassenor
Advertisement