Leaving them alone would work quite nicely, I believe.
Advertisement

by Wienholdland » Sun May 22, 2011 2:37 pm

by Conserative Morality » Sun May 22, 2011 2:38 pm
Esoterias wrote:Isreal won that land fair and square. Who are we to tell them to give it up?
by Mahdah » Sun May 22, 2011 2:40 pm

by Esoterias » Sun May 22, 2011 2:41 pm
Mahdah wrote:Esoterias wrote:Israel won that land fair and square. Who are we to tell them to give it up?
Would you rather have a huge amount of Anti Jewish forces from the Middle east take over isreal and possibly kill everyone and restore it Palestine..
Or...
Ask them to move themselves back to there 1967 borders
John Lennon wrote:When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy’. They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life.

by EnragedMaldivians » Sun May 22, 2011 2:41 pm


by Wienholdland » Sun May 22, 2011 2:41 pm

by Call to power » Sun May 22, 2011 2:42 pm
Genivaria wrote:Not our problem.
Solyhniya wrote:Exactly, try being gay in any other Middle Eastern country and see how far you get. Also, try practising freedom of religion anywhere else in the Middle East. Then tell me how evil Israel is compared to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Yemen, Egypt, Syria, Iran... etc.
Chinese Regions wrote:the real question is should the USA support Saudi Arabia?

by Conserative Morality » Sun May 22, 2011 2:44 pm
EnragedMaldivians wrote:As long as you employ the proper euphemisms and conceal your realpoliticking in diplomatic language. There is no need to be completely blatant about it - not in an age when "soft power" matters.

by Vecherd » Sun May 22, 2011 2:44 pm

by Darenjo » Sun May 22, 2011 2:45 pm
EnragedMaldivians wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:The most powerful country in the world?
If we're playing Might = Right, then we have the right to tell them to give up that land.
As long as you employ the proper euphemisms and conceal your realpoliticking in diplomatic language. There is no need to be completely blatant about it - not in an age when "soft power" matters.

by Keronians » Sun May 22, 2011 2:46 pm


by Conserative Morality » Sun May 22, 2011 2:46 pm
Darenjo wrote:We tried that. It's called the Clinton and Bush Administrations.
And, um, if "soft power" mattered more than actual power, then Iran and North Korea would not have nukes, America would take orders from China, Russia would be a gigantic corporation-state, etc. "Hard" power still matters. A lot. America just doesn't know when to use it.


by Genivaria » Sun May 22, 2011 2:46 pm

by Call to power » Sun May 22, 2011 2:48 pm
Vecherd wrote:Here the Liberal supports Israel and the Authoritarian are against Israel.
Esoterias wrote:Israel won that land fair and square. Who are we to tell them to give it up?
Vecherd wrote:Cyprus isnt an Islamic nation.

by Keronians » Sun May 22, 2011 2:48 pm
EnragedMaldivians wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:The most powerful country in the world?
If we're playing Might = Right, then we have the right to tell them to give up that land.
As long as you employ the proper euphemisms and conceal your realpoliticking in diplomatic language. There is no need to be completely blatant about it - not in an age when "soft power" matters.

by EnragedMaldivians » Sun May 22, 2011 2:48 pm
Darenjo wrote:EnragedMaldivians wrote:
As long as you employ the proper euphemisms and conceal your realpoliticking in diplomatic language. There is no need to be completely blatant about it - not in an age when "soft power" matters.
We tried that. It's called the Clinton and Bush Administrations.
And, um, if "soft power" mattered more than actual power, then Iran and North Korea would not have nukes, America would take orders from China, Russia would be a gigantic corporation-state, etc. "Hard" power still matters. A lot. America just doesn't know when to use it.

by Conserative Morality » Sun May 22, 2011 2:49 pm
Keronians wrote:Does "do what I say or we'll liberate your ass" count as concealing it?
... Perhaps I should work on that, then...

by Keronians » Sun May 22, 2011 2:49 pm
Darenjo wrote:EnragedMaldivians wrote:
As long as you employ the proper euphemisms and conceal your realpoliticking in diplomatic language. There is no need to be completely blatant about it - not in an age when "soft power" matters.
We tried that. It's called the Clinton and Bush Administrations.
And, um, if "soft power" mattered more than actual power, then Iran and North Korea would not have nukes, America would take orders from China, Russia would be a gigantic corporation-state, etc. "Hard" power still matters. A lot. America just doesn't know when to use it.

by Keronians » Sun May 22, 2011 2:49 pm

by Syvorji » Sun May 22, 2011 2:50 pm

by Conserative Morality » Sun May 22, 2011 2:50 pm
Keronians wrote:I think you mean that America doesn't know how to use soft power.
Look at Europe. There's an example of how to make good use of soft power.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Candesia, Edush, Point Blob, Senkaku
Advertisement