by Agritum » Thu May 19, 2011 7:51 am
by Cosmopoles » Thu May 19, 2011 7:57 am
by Vellosia » Thu May 19, 2011 7:59 am
by Angleter » Thu May 19, 2011 8:33 am
Agritum wrote:well,a type of semi-active democracy exists in Switzerland,but we have to remind that it isn't a big country in terms of population
by Volnotova » Thu May 19, 2011 8:34 am
by Moral Libertarians » Thu May 19, 2011 8:37 am
Terra Agora wrote:A state, no matter how small, is not liberty. Taxes are not liberty, government courts are not liberty, government police are not liberty. Anarchy is liberty and anarchy is order.
by Margolias » Thu May 19, 2011 8:40 am
by Opaloka » Thu May 19, 2011 8:50 am
Volnotova wrote:Representative democracy is a lie. 1 person cannot be the representative of the feelings, thoughts and lives of thousands let alone millions of people.
Active "democracy" is just a fancy name for mobocracy.
by Augarundus » Thu May 19, 2011 9:44 am
by Serrland » Thu May 19, 2011 9:54 am
Agritum wrote:personally,I think active dem is better because it really gives peoples complete voting power over reforms or other decisions,but i would like to know the opinions of other users here.
ps: if somrone doesn't know,active is the voting directly by the population trough referendums and representative is the voting done by representants elected by the population Aka Parliament
by Horsefish » Thu May 19, 2011 9:57 am
Georgism wrote:Representative democracy with referenda for major constitutional changes.
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.
by Moral Libertarians » Thu May 19, 2011 10:20 am
Terra Agora wrote:A state, no matter how small, is not liberty. Taxes are not liberty, government courts are not liberty, government police are not liberty. Anarchy is liberty and anarchy is order.
by Georgism » Thu May 19, 2011 10:23 am
Moral Libertarians wrote:Don't you think it would be... dangerous... to have populations able to declare war on other countries or handle other such decisions? In times of emergency, the people may be angry and acting as a mob rather than thinking rationally about issues.
by Moral Libertarians » Thu May 19, 2011 10:30 am
Georgism wrote:Moral Libertarians wrote:Don't you think it would be... dangerous... to have populations able to declare war on other countries or handle other such decisions? In times of emergency, the people may be angry and acting as a mob rather than thinking rationally about issues.
I think it would be more like:
Government wants to declare war on X country
Government must hold referendum before it can do this
Although governments in the UK don't actually have to abide by the results of a referendum, IIRC.
Terra Agora wrote:A state, no matter how small, is not liberty. Taxes are not liberty, government courts are not liberty, government police are not liberty. Anarchy is liberty and anarchy is order.
by Manango » Thu May 19, 2011 11:04 am
Agritum wrote:personally,I think active dem is better because it really gives peoples complete voting power over reforms or other decisions
by Horsefish » Thu May 19, 2011 11:14 am
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.
by Horsefish » Thu May 19, 2011 11:18 am
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Aggicificicerous, Ancientania, Hidrandia, Ineva, Kostane, Kreushia, Omphalos, Plan Neonie, Shrillland, Talibanada, Tungstan, Wisteria and Surrounding Territories
Advertisement