NATION

PASSWORD

Wanted: Clever Pro-Choice Slogans

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Auremena
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26352
Founded: Mar 04, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Auremena » Mon May 09, 2011 12:30 pm

My body, my choice.
NS's aviation and train sabelotodo.
Post-left anarchist and sad about it.
Killdash, Firsthome, Coffee Cakes, SSC, GCoCS, Snowy, Val, Aeqy, and Replevion are my bitches.
Foot worshipper: Lutvikkia. Dakky's mom, I had her with Nana.
The female Jim Morrison; not as talented, but just as attractive and self destructive. The one true heir to the throne of the Lizard King.
Some poetry I write sometimes
Tearing the MBTA a new one since 2014. The MTA too since 2016. Cover the world in trains 2030
COYS!

User avatar
Soviet Commu-Facism
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 456
Founded: Sep 16, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Commu-Facism » Mon May 09, 2011 12:30 pm

Nulono wrote:
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Just so everyone remembers, I slightly support abortion, but only because I believe that children have the right to a painless death, and the fact that a woman was raped makes a very gray region in my eyes. But as for the principle of "woman's choice"? It's sick to say that an individual has the right to murder under certain circumstances. With the death penalty, it is an execution being carried out by "society" or in the best interests of it (hopefully).
Do you support other painless killings as well?

When I know that someone is going to die regardlessly, I might. I only support abortion though because I do not want babies to killed in a horrible and painful way. It would be illogical to believe that you could stop all infanticide, not unless the whole of a society changed the whole way it thought.

User avatar
Flameswroth
Senator
 
Posts: 4773
Founded: Sep 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Flameswroth » Mon May 09, 2011 12:30 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Nulono wrote:Except it's an ad hominem and factually inaccurate, seeing as so many women are pro-life.


You just love threadjacking don't you? Didn't even bother reading the OP, just love to go on your Operation Rescue sponsored tirades in favor of pregnancy-related fatalities and overpopulation.

How many more Gauthier's and Nulono's will be born into the world if we ban abortions? We must save future generations from this fate, and be pro-choice!

...that's a bit long for a slogan though...
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?

Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.

That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.



User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon May 09, 2011 12:32 pm

Norstal wrote:
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Wow, you are sad. Your just like those American right-wing or left-wing nutters. I hate the US government and its society, but not the people. To hate the US people, I would hate some of my cousins. I LOVE my cousins, ergo I could not hate Americans, ergo I do not hate all life, ergo I am not pro-genocide, ergo you are the foolish one. And I'm not pro-life or pro-choice; I am who I am, ergo I have my own beliefs and values based on actual LOGIC and my own personal faith (religious) beliefs. I cannot have my faith without the logic to back it up, which I hope everyone can learn to do.

What a bloody liar. You just said that you wanted to kill women who just had an abortion. You realize just how fucking idiotic and stupid that is right? That is stupid on an imaginable scale. That is so stupid, this universe can't contain it alone.

Ergo, you hate people because you want people to DIE after abortion. Which means, you hate people. Again, as a pro-lifer, politicians or not, you have to want everyone to live. Even the U.S government.

Your hypocrisy is astounding.

Uh... even when we think people are wrong, flaming is still not condoned.

User avatar
Esoterias
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: May 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Esoterias » Mon May 09, 2011 12:32 pm

"I am not Uncle Sam's Wife! I am independent!"
Member of the Confederation of Nations
National Information NSEconomy Slovitrean Heavy Indistries Political Views
John Lennon wrote:When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy’. They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life.

User avatar
Nulono
Senator
 
Posts: 3805
Founded: Jun 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Nulono » Mon May 09, 2011 12:33 pm

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:
Nulono wrote:Do you support other painless killings as well?

When I know that someone is going to die regardlessly, I might. I only support abortion though because I do not want babies to killed in a horrible and painful way. It would be illogical to believe that you could stop all infanticide, not unless the whole of a society changed the whole way it thought.

So you're for infanticide?


Gauthier wrote:
Nulono wrote:Except it's an ad hominem and factually inaccurate, seeing as so many women are pro-life.


You just love threadjacking don't you? Didn't even bother reading the OP, just love to go on your Operation Rescue sponsored tirades in favor of pregnancy-related fatalities and overpopulation.

I'm for life-saving abortions. I'm not for overpopulation.
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
Numbers written with an apostrophe are in dozenal unless otherwise noted.
For example, 0'3 = 0.25, and 100' = 144.

Ratios are measured in perunums instead of percent.
1 perunum = 100 percent = 84' percent

The Nuclear Fist wrote:If all it it takes to count as a five star hotel in America is having air conditioning and not letting those who reside in it die of hyperthermia, you have shitty hotels.

Republika Jugoslavija wrote:Actually nuclear war is not the world ending scenario that many would have folks believe.

User avatar
Soviet Commu-Facism
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 456
Founded: Sep 16, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Commu-Facism » Mon May 09, 2011 12:33 pm

Dakini wrote:
Norstal wrote:What a bloody liar. You just said that you wanted to kill women who just had an abortion. You realize just how fucking idiotic and stupid that is right? That is stupid on an imaginable scale. That is so stupid, this universe can't contain it alone.

Ergo, you hate people because you want people to DIE after abortion. Which means, you hate people. Again, as a pro-lifer, politicians or not, you have to want everyone to live. Even the U.S government.

Your hypocrisy is astounding.

Uh... even when we think people are wrong, flaming is still not condoned.

Ah, he was flaming too? Sorry, but I'm still a bit of a newb on the net, but I am learning. However, his anger certainly has not supported him and his argument, so I don't take as much offence.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon May 09, 2011 12:34 pm

"Pro Lifer: Someone who is afraid if abortion was legal back then, they'd never be here today in the first place."
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Belkaros
Envoy
 
Posts: 220
Founded: Sep 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Belkaros » Mon May 09, 2011 12:35 pm

Wow, you are actually too stupid to argue with. None of what you just said is remotely accurate, other than the debt to China. I am done arguing with someone so completely ignorant.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon May 09, 2011 12:35 pm

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:
Dakini wrote:Uh... even when we think people are wrong, flaming is still not condoned.

Ah, he was flaming too? Sorry, but I'm still a bit of a newb on the net, but I am learning. However, his anger certainly has not supported him and his argument, so I don't take as much offence.

Generally saying that someone's argument is "fucking idiotic and stupid" and "stupid on an unimaginable scale" is pretty flamey.

User avatar
Soviet Commu-Facism
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 456
Founded: Sep 16, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Commu-Facism » Mon May 09, 2011 12:36 pm

Nulono wrote:
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:When I know that someone is going to die regardlessly, I might. I only support abortion though because I do not want babies to killed in a horrible and painful way. It would be illogical to believe that you could stop all infanticide, not unless the whole of a society changed the whole way it thought.

So you're for infanticide?


Gauthier wrote:
You just love threadjacking don't you? Didn't even bother reading the OP, just love to go on your Operation Rescue sponsored tirades in favor of pregnancy-related fatalities and overpopulation.

I'm for life-saving abortions. I'm not for overpopulation.

No. I am for peaceful death for innocent babies. They don't deserve the pain of some moron butchering them or drowning them because they didn't want a baby. And yes, that has happened. Too many times.

User avatar
Soviet Commu-Facism
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 456
Founded: Sep 16, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Commu-Facism » Mon May 09, 2011 12:36 pm

Dakini wrote:
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Ah, he was flaming too? Sorry, but I'm still a bit of a newb on the net, but I am learning. However, his anger certainly has not supported him and his argument, so I don't take as much offence.

Generally saying that someone's argument is "fucking idiotic and stupid" and "stupid on an unimaginable scale" is pretty flamey.

Well, I just get so used to it on Nation States and tend to forget that it isn't allowed.

User avatar
Soviet Commu-Facism
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 456
Founded: Sep 16, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Commu-Facism » Mon May 09, 2011 12:39 pm

Belkaros wrote:Wow, you are actually too stupid to argue with. None of what you just said is remotely accurate, other than the debt to China. I am done arguing with someone so completely ignorant.

Really? Am I wrong? Then prove me wrong. Don't just call me a fool and walk away, prove it. If you can't, then you proved the exact opposite of what you just claimed. Oh, and what I said was true, I read newspapers, magazines, internet posts, etc, etc. So, as said, prove yourself. Oh, and don't pull that rhetoric that I need to prove myself because I am not the one claiming you are a fool.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Mon May 09, 2011 12:39 pm

Dakini wrote:
Norstal wrote:What a bloody liar. You just said that you wanted to kill women who just had an abortion. You realize just how fucking idiotic and stupid that is right? That is stupid on an imaginable scale. That is so stupid, this universe can't contain it alone.

Ergo, you hate people because you want people to DIE after abortion. Which means, you hate people. Again, as a pro-lifer, politicians or not, you have to want everyone to live. Even the U.S government.

Your hypocrisy is astounding.

Uh... even when we think people are wrong, flaming is still not condoned.

It's not flaming. If I say "you are an utter fucking moron" that's flaming. If I say, "you'll look like an utter fucking moron", that's not flaming.

If the mods charge me for this, then meh. This has happened in the past.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Mon May 09, 2011 12:42 pm

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:
Norstal wrote:What a bloody liar. You just said that you wanted to kill women who just had an abortion. You realize just how fucking idiotic and stupid that is right? That is stupid on an imaginable scale. That is so stupid, this universe can't contain it alone.

Ergo, you hate people because you want people to DIE after abortion. Which means, you hate people. Again, as a pro-lifer, politicians or not, you have to want everyone to live. Even the U.S government.

Your hypocrisy is astounding.

What? Where did I say ANYWHERE that woman who get an abortion should be killed? I did NOT say that. Once more, I'm not a pro-lifer, I am an individual who uses logic and who makes decisions that suit certain situations. Which is why I somewhat support abortion. But please, find where I said that women who abort should be killed, because I know I would not have said something that stupid.

So why did you compare it to the death penalty then. Aren't you implying that? :eyebrow:
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Mon May 09, 2011 12:43 pm

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:No. I am for peaceful death for innocent babies. They don't deserve the pain of some moron butchering them or drowning them because they didn't want a baby. And yes, that has happened. Too many times.

Yet somehow, abortion is not peaceful enough. You have to drag them out of the woman's vagina and have them die that way. Astounding.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Mon May 09, 2011 12:44 pm

Dakini wrote:
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Ah, he was flaming too? Sorry, but I'm still a bit of a newb on the net, but I am learning. However, his anger certainly has not supported him and his argument, so I don't take as much offence.

Generally saying that someone's argument is "fucking idiotic and stupid" and "stupid on an unimaginable scale" is pretty flamey.

"Attack the argument, not the poster". I attacked his argument. Not the poster.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Nulono
Senator
 
Posts: 3805
Founded: Jun 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Nulono » Mon May 09, 2011 12:44 pm

Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:
Nulono wrote:So you're for infanticide?



I'm for life-saving abortions. I'm not for overpopulation.

No. I am for peaceful death for innocent babies. They don't deserve the pain of some moron butchering them or drowning them because they didn't want a baby. And yes, that has happened. Too many times.

So we should make it legal to kill people so that they'll be killed "peacefully"?
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
Numbers written with an apostrophe are in dozenal unless otherwise noted.
For example, 0'3 = 0.25, and 100' = 144.

Ratios are measured in perunums instead of percent.
1 perunum = 100 percent = 84' percent

The Nuclear Fist wrote:If all it it takes to count as a five star hotel in America is having air conditioning and not letting those who reside in it die of hyperthermia, you have shitty hotels.

Republika Jugoslavija wrote:Actually nuclear war is not the world ending scenario that many would have folks believe.

User avatar
Bitchkitten
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1438
Founded: Dec 29, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Bitchkitten » Mon May 09, 2011 1:02 pm

Nulono wrote:
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:No. I am for peaceful death for innocent babies. They don't deserve the pain of some moron butchering them or drowning them because they didn't want a baby. And yes, that has happened. Too many times.

So we should make it legal to kill people so that they'll be killed "peacefully"?

Is't it? The state of Texas does it "peacefully" at least thirty times a year.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon May 09, 2011 1:07 pm

Norstal wrote:
Dakini wrote:Generally saying that someone's argument is "fucking idiotic and stupid" and "stupid on an unimaginable scale" is pretty flamey.

"Attack the argument, not the poster". I attacked his argument. Not the poster.

I'd suspect that it's skating a thin line...

User avatar
DaWoad
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9066
Founded: Nov 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby DaWoad » Mon May 09, 2011 2:06 pm

Dakini wrote:
Norstal wrote:"Attack the argument, not the poster". I attacked his argument. Not the poster.

I'd suspect that it's skating a thin line...

not at all. Attacking the poster is off limits their argument is not.
Official Nation States Trainer
Factbook:http://nationstates.wikia.com/wiki/User:Dawoad
Alliances:The Hegemony, The GDF, SCUTUM

Supporter of making [citation needed] the official NSG way to say "source?"

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon May 09, 2011 2:12 pm

DaWoad wrote:
Dakini wrote:I'd suspect that it's skating a thin line...

not at all. Attacking the poster is off limits their argument is not.

I don't know that attacking the argument that way is entirely fine though. I have would suspected not, but I guess since no modly action has come down, calling an argument fucking stupid is fine?
Last edited by Dakini on Mon May 09, 2011 2:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35919
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Mon May 09, 2011 2:28 pm

Flameswroth wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
You just love threadjacking don't you? Didn't even bother reading the OP, just love to go on your Operation Rescue sponsored tirades in favor of pregnancy-related fatalities and overpopulation.

How many more Gauthier's and Nulono's will be born into the world if we ban abortions? We must save future generations from this fate, and be pro-choice!

...that's a bit long for a slogan though...

That's also flaming. So, *** warned for flaming ***,

User avatar
DaWoad
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9066
Founded: Nov 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby DaWoad » Mon May 09, 2011 2:31 pm

Dakini wrote:
DaWoad wrote:not at all. Attacking the poster is off limits their argument is not.

I don't know that attacking the argument that way is entirely fine though. I have would suspected not, but I guess since no modly action has come down, calling an argument fucking stupid is fine?

yep. unless it gets into the trolling/flamebait/inappropriate for pg13 area
Official Nation States Trainer
Factbook:http://nationstates.wikia.com/wiki/User:Dawoad
Alliances:The Hegemony, The GDF, SCUTUM

Supporter of making [citation needed] the official NSG way to say "source?"

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35919
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Mon May 09, 2011 2:34 pm

Norstal wrote:
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:????? lol wut? I don't hate people, I hate the US and the society that it has created. I have no problem with people and I want to help as many as possible, but the US is the largest consumer nation in the world and only has a few hundred million people living in it. Compare that to Indian and China, each with populations in the billions and, and the fact that they still consume less then the US becomes disturbing.

You do hate the people living the U.S. Ergo, you hate people. To support pro-life, you have to support ALL lives, even the people who lives in the U.S. Differentiating between those who live in the U.S and those who aren't is not pro-life, but utter discrimination and hatred.

Ergo, you are pro-genocide. Not pro-life. So, again, check your moral compass (if you even have any) and remove yourself from this thread because you look like an utter fucking moron.

*** Warned for flaming ***

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Celritannia, Dakran, Dimetrodon Empire, DutchFormosa, Gun Manufacturers, Kehlstein, La Xinga, Nilokeras, Terra dei Cittadini, The Black Forrest, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic

Advertisement

Remove ads