Advertisement

by Auremena » Mon May 09, 2011 12:30 pm

by Soviet Commu-Facism » Mon May 09, 2011 12:30 pm
Nulono wrote:Do you support other painless killings as well?Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Just so everyone remembers, I slightly support abortion, but only because I believe that children have the right to a painless death, and the fact that a woman was raped makes a very gray region in my eyes. But as for the principle of "woman's choice"? It's sick to say that an individual has the right to murder under certain circumstances. With the death penalty, it is an execution being carried out by "society" or in the best interests of it (hopefully).

by Flameswroth » Mon May 09, 2011 12:30 pm
Gauthier wrote:Nulono wrote:Except it's an ad hominem and factually inaccurate, seeing as so many women are pro-life.
You just love threadjacking don't you? Didn't even bother reading the OP, just love to go on your Operation Rescue sponsored tirades in favor of pregnancy-related fatalities and overpopulation.
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?
Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.
That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.

by Dakini » Mon May 09, 2011 12:32 pm
Norstal wrote:Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Wow, you are sad. Your just like those American right-wing or left-wing nutters. I hate the US government and its society, but not the people. To hate the US people, I would hate some of my cousins. I LOVE my cousins, ergo I could not hate Americans, ergo I do not hate all life, ergo I am not pro-genocide, ergo you are the foolish one. And I'm not pro-life or pro-choice; I am who I am, ergo I have my own beliefs and values based on actual LOGIC and my own personal faith (religious) beliefs. I cannot have my faith without the logic to back it up, which I hope everyone can learn to do.
What a bloody liar. You just said that you wanted to kill women who just had an abortion. You realize just how fucking idiotic and stupid that is right? That is stupid on an imaginable scale. That is so stupid, this universe can't contain it alone.
Ergo, you hate people because you want people to DIE after abortion. Which means, you hate people. Again, as a pro-lifer, politicians or not, you have to want everyone to live. Even the U.S government.
Your hypocrisy is astounding.

by Esoterias » Mon May 09, 2011 12:32 pm
John Lennon wrote:When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy’. They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life.

by Nulono » Mon May 09, 2011 12:33 pm
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Nulono wrote:Do you support other painless killings as well?
When I know that someone is going to die regardlessly, I might. I only support abortion though because I do not want babies to killed in a horrible and painful way. It would be illogical to believe that you could stop all infanticide, not unless the whole of a society changed the whole way it thought.
Gauthier wrote:Nulono wrote:Except it's an ad hominem and factually inaccurate, seeing as so many women are pro-life.
You just love threadjacking don't you? Didn't even bother reading the OP, just love to go on your Operation Rescue sponsored tirades in favor of pregnancy-related fatalities and overpopulation.
The Nuclear Fist wrote:If all it it takes to count as a five star hotel in America is having air conditioning and not letting those who reside in it die of hyperthermia, you have shitty hotels.
Republika Jugoslavija wrote:Actually nuclear war is not the world ending scenario that many would have folks believe.

by Soviet Commu-Facism » Mon May 09, 2011 12:33 pm
Dakini wrote:Norstal wrote:What a bloody liar. You just said that you wanted to kill women who just had an abortion. You realize just how fucking idiotic and stupid that is right? That is stupid on an imaginable scale. That is so stupid, this universe can't contain it alone.
Ergo, you hate people because you want people to DIE after abortion. Which means, you hate people. Again, as a pro-lifer, politicians or not, you have to want everyone to live. Even the U.S government.
Your hypocrisy is astounding.
Uh... even when we think people are wrong, flaming is still not condoned.

by Gauthier » Mon May 09, 2011 12:34 pm

by Dakini » Mon May 09, 2011 12:35 pm
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Dakini wrote:Uh... even when we think people are wrong, flaming is still not condoned.
Ah, he was flaming too? Sorry, but I'm still a bit of a newb on the net, but I am learning. However, his anger certainly has not supported him and his argument, so I don't take as much offence.

by Soviet Commu-Facism » Mon May 09, 2011 12:36 pm
Nulono wrote:Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:When I know that someone is going to die regardlessly, I might. I only support abortion though because I do not want babies to killed in a horrible and painful way. It would be illogical to believe that you could stop all infanticide, not unless the whole of a society changed the whole way it thought.
So you're for infanticide?Gauthier wrote:
You just love threadjacking don't you? Didn't even bother reading the OP, just love to go on your Operation Rescue sponsored tirades in favor of pregnancy-related fatalities and overpopulation.
I'm for life-saving abortions. I'm not for overpopulation.

by Soviet Commu-Facism » Mon May 09, 2011 12:36 pm
Dakini wrote:Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Ah, he was flaming too? Sorry, but I'm still a bit of a newb on the net, but I am learning. However, his anger certainly has not supported him and his argument, so I don't take as much offence.
Generally saying that someone's argument is "fucking idiotic and stupid" and "stupid on an unimaginable scale" is pretty flamey.

by Soviet Commu-Facism » Mon May 09, 2011 12:39 pm
Belkaros wrote:Wow, you are actually too stupid to argue with. None of what you just said is remotely accurate, other than the debt to China. I am done arguing with someone so completely ignorant.

by Norstal » Mon May 09, 2011 12:39 pm
Dakini wrote:Norstal wrote:What a bloody liar. You just said that you wanted to kill women who just had an abortion. You realize just how fucking idiotic and stupid that is right? That is stupid on an imaginable scale. That is so stupid, this universe can't contain it alone.
Ergo, you hate people because you want people to DIE after abortion. Which means, you hate people. Again, as a pro-lifer, politicians or not, you have to want everyone to live. Even the U.S government.
Your hypocrisy is astounding.
Uh... even when we think people are wrong, flaming is still not condoned.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Norstal » Mon May 09, 2011 12:42 pm
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Norstal wrote:What a bloody liar. You just said that you wanted to kill women who just had an abortion. You realize just how fucking idiotic and stupid that is right? That is stupid on an imaginable scale. That is so stupid, this universe can't contain it alone.
Ergo, you hate people because you want people to DIE after abortion. Which means, you hate people. Again, as a pro-lifer, politicians or not, you have to want everyone to live. Even the U.S government.
Your hypocrisy is astounding.
What? Where did I say ANYWHERE that woman who get an abortion should be killed? I did NOT say that. Once more, I'm not a pro-lifer, I am an individual who uses logic and who makes decisions that suit certain situations. Which is why I somewhat support abortion. But please, find where I said that women who abort should be killed, because I know I would not have said something that stupid.

Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Norstal » Mon May 09, 2011 12:43 pm
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:No. I am for peaceful death for innocent babies. They don't deserve the pain of some moron butchering them or drowning them because they didn't want a baby. And yes, that has happened. Too many times.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Norstal » Mon May 09, 2011 12:44 pm
Dakini wrote:Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:Ah, he was flaming too? Sorry, but I'm still a bit of a newb on the net, but I am learning. However, his anger certainly has not supported him and his argument, so I don't take as much offence.
Generally saying that someone's argument is "fucking idiotic and stupid" and "stupid on an unimaginable scale" is pretty flamey.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Nulono » Mon May 09, 2011 12:44 pm
Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:
No. I am for peaceful death for innocent babies. They don't deserve the pain of some moron butchering them or drowning them because they didn't want a baby. And yes, that has happened. Too many times.
The Nuclear Fist wrote:If all it it takes to count as a five star hotel in America is having air conditioning and not letting those who reside in it die of hyperthermia, you have shitty hotels.
Republika Jugoslavija wrote:Actually nuclear war is not the world ending scenario that many would have folks believe.

by Bitchkitten » Mon May 09, 2011 1:02 pm
Nulono wrote:Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:No. I am for peaceful death for innocent babies. They don't deserve the pain of some moron butchering them or drowning them because they didn't want a baby. And yes, that has happened. Too many times.
So we should make it legal to kill people so that they'll be killed "peacefully"?

by Dakini » Mon May 09, 2011 1:07 pm

by DaWoad » Mon May 09, 2011 2:06 pm

by Dakini » Mon May 09, 2011 2:12 pm

by Katganistan » Mon May 09, 2011 2:28 pm
Flameswroth wrote:Gauthier wrote:
You just love threadjacking don't you? Didn't even bother reading the OP, just love to go on your Operation Rescue sponsored tirades in favor of pregnancy-related fatalities and overpopulation.
How many more Gauthier's and Nulono's will be born into the world if we ban abortions? We must save future generations from this fate, and be pro-choice!
...that's a bit long for a slogan though...

by DaWoad » Mon May 09, 2011 2:31 pm

by Katganistan » Mon May 09, 2011 2:34 pm
Norstal wrote:Soviet Commu-Facism wrote:????? lol wut? I don't hate people, I hate the US and the society that it has created. I have no problem with people and I want to help as many as possible, but the US is the largest consumer nation in the world and only has a few hundred million people living in it. Compare that to Indian and China, each with populations in the billions and, and the fact that they still consume less then the US becomes disturbing.
You do hate the people living the U.S. Ergo, you hate people. To support pro-life, you have to support ALL lives, even the people who lives in the U.S. Differentiating between those who live in the U.S and those who aren't is not pro-life, but utter discrimination and hatred.
Ergo, you are pro-genocide. Not pro-life. So, again, check your moral compass (if you even have any) and remove yourself from this thread because you look like an utter fucking moron.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Celritannia, Dakran, Dimetrodon Empire, DutchFormosa, Gun Manufacturers, Kehlstein, La Xinga, Nilokeras, Terra dei Cittadini, The Black Forrest, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic
Advertisement