And for whatever reason we're sending them money. I think we'd be better off cutting them out, and getting in with the Indians, personally.
Advertisement

by Andaluciae » Wed May 04, 2011 5:56 am
Ugly Ants wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
Yes, he was unarmed, big fucking deal. Did you not read what I said earlier? How do you know he wasn't grabbing for something? How do you know somebody else in the house or even in the room wasn't armed? Yes, ignoring the ISI and the 12 yr. old girl's comments.
Oh right, I forgot. When you storm a compound in a hostile area looking after a guy who is responsible for the death of at least 3,000 civilians, you gently burst into a room, though not too hard since you obviously don't want to startle anyone or damage anything; followed by a search of the room, once you gain the written consent of those inside; and after spending about two and a half hours doing this, then you go into "serious" mode and start shooting everybody. That's not how it happens or works. I repeat "NOT HOW IT HAPPENS."
Imagine you are a navy seal, landing in a compound, you are moving through a dark hallway, you hear noises, shots are fired, you shoot back, you burst into a room and you see the target, he looks like he's grabbing for something, you are unclear of what, so you take the shot knowing that if it's a gun or bomb, it's going to be you.
That's how it happens. Okay? It's not some gentle, take your time kind of shit. It's quick, it's stressful, and you don't take a chance, especially with a guy like this. Because you don't know what he is going to do.
On one side, you have an unarmed old sick man, on the other side a well trained team of Navy Seals, specialised in all kind of combat techniques.
IMHO, it isn't that hard to immobilize the bastard, whatever he’s trying and alive.
They could have shot in his legs, by instance. If you ask me, they didn't want to capture him alive. You'll see that when the cheering is over, questions will raise.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

by Rowandel » Wed May 04, 2011 6:00 am

by Rowandel » Wed May 04, 2011 6:01 am


by Maurepas » Wed May 04, 2011 6:03 am
Rowandel wrote:Maurepas wrote:And for whatever reason we're sending them money. I think we'd be better off cutting them out, and getting in with the Indians, personally.
As much as I agree, there's no way in HELL we can do that NOW. We just stormed into their country, raped shit up, and left, THEN told them... We CAN'T cut ties with them.

by Rowandel » Wed May 04, 2011 6:05 am
Maurepas wrote:Rowandel wrote:
As much as I agree, there's no way in HELL we can do that NOW. We just stormed into their country, raped shit up, and left, THEN told them... We CAN'T cut ties with them.
Actually, we haven't done that to Pakistan. And, honestly, what's Afghanistan gonna do if we did that to them? Nothing. Vietnam had a more organized military and good reason to hate us as well: They're one of our bigger trading partners today.

by Ashmoria » Wed May 04, 2011 7:02 am
Andaluciae wrote:Sea Captains Folly wrote:I love how he was hiding in a $1,000,000 mansion. Now do we honestly think America didn't see it? A 1m compound right outside the perimeter of what looks like a favela. I mean lets be honest no one is that stupid. Precisley when this had been going for like 10 years. So I connect the dots with 400 terriosts escaping and the death of Osama. He could of kept hiding I don't know what was stopping America from just going in and killing him before (Besides Pakistans permission) buy I'll let you be creative but I believe that they agreed to release those 400 prisoners in exchange for the life of Osama. Its only logical (from the news I have heard thus far) that they have not recaptured or even chased down one (runaway terriost).
As a former employee of the defense establishment: Are you fucking kidding me? I'm flatters you think so much of our skills, but your expectations are severely misplaced.

by Ashmoria » Wed May 04, 2011 7:03 am
Ugly Ants wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:I imagine the circumstances are harder than we really understand. For example, was he reaching for a weapon? Was the woman he was with? Were the children? Did he try to push or grab something when he was told to stop?
We assume (also don't post big ass pics on posts) from some bare facts the reality of the case, when we really just don't know. In the heat of things, you're aren't being overly cautious, you are making sure you accomplish your mission, that your team and you live. I know it has become somewhat of a cliche in counter-terrorist shows, but they hold some truth in them. Accidents happen. But again, we really don't have enough details.
The 12 year old daughter of Bin Laden said on TV station Al Arabiya that her father was captured alive and shot a few minutes later.
The Pakistani security services also said that there were no weapons in the house and that no one shoot to the American forces.
If you ask me, this is just an execution. It doesn't matter if Bin Laden was guilty or not. Probably he was, but the whole thing looks dirty.

by Vault 1 » Wed May 04, 2011 7:07 am
Andaluciae wrote:So...is Hitler dead? How about Genghis Khan? No bodies, no pictures. They must still be alive.

by EnragedMaldivians » Wed May 04, 2011 7:09 am
Andaluciae wrote:Sea Captains Folly wrote:I love how he was hiding in a $1,000,000 mansion. Now do we honestly think America didn't see it? A 1m compound right outside the perimeter of what looks like a favela. I mean lets be honest no one is that stupid. Precisley when this had been going for like 10 years. So I connect the dots with 400 terriosts escaping and the death of Osama. He could of kept hiding I don't know what was stopping America from just going in and killing him before (Besides Pakistans permission) buy I'll let you be creative but I believe that they agreed to release those 400 prisoners in exchange for the life of Osama. Its only logical (from the news I have heard thus far) that they have not recaptured or even chased down one (runaway terriost).
As a former employee of the defense establishment: Are you fucking kidding me? I'm flatters you think so much of our skills, but your expectations are severely misplaced.

by Ashmoria » Wed May 04, 2011 7:11 am
Vault 1 wrote:Andaluciae wrote:So...is Hitler dead? How about Genghis Khan? No bodies, no pictures. They must still be alive.
There have been multiple witness accounts on Hitler's death.
All we know here is that US stormed a compound, shot some Arab, then said it's OBL. The last time they at least bothered with pics. It may well be that they were actually going after OBL, got someone else, then decided to say it's OBL anyway. Doesn't matter.
When they got Hussein, it was all public, in the open, with video coverage, and he was buried in the ground, no bullshit. And Saddam definitely had more supporters than Osama, which are still fighting in Iraq; no one doubts the latter is or was a bad guy. This whole coverup just doesn't smell right and I'm not eating it.

by Vault 1 » Wed May 04, 2011 7:26 am
Ashmoria wrote:it would be stupid on a massive scale to pretend to kill a man who could then come foward at any time to prove the president a liar.

by Utopia FTW » Wed May 04, 2011 7:31 am

by The Alma Mater » Wed May 04, 2011 7:32 am
Ashmoria wrote:what doesnt smell right is that a DEMOCRAT got the most wanted man in the world.

by Ashmoria » Wed May 04, 2011 7:32 am
Vault 1 wrote:Ashmoria wrote:it would be stupid on a massive scale to pretend to kill a man who could then come foward at any time to prove the president a liar.
Obama is known to be a habitual liar as it is, what's one more time?
Even so, that's only a factor if we are to assume Osama is still alive and well. Nothing has been heard from him in a LONG while. In the case that he is alive, him coming out will certainly get him killed for real. Actually, if that happens, I'll applaud Obama's ingenuity in getting his namesake.

by Andaluciae » Wed May 04, 2011 7:39 am
All we know here is that US stormed a compound, shot some Arab, then said it's OBL. The last time they at least bothered with pics. It may well be that they were actually going after OBL, got someone else, then decided to say it's OBL anyway. Doesn't matter.
When they got Hussein, it was all public, in the open, with video coverage, and he was buried in the ground, no bullshit. And Saddam definitely had more supporters than Osama, which are still fighting in Iraq; no one doubts the latter is or was a bad guy. This whole coverup just doesn't smell right and I'm not eating it.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

by Vault 1 » Wed May 04, 2011 7:45 am
Andaluciae wrote:That's definitely more than we have for Hitler.
Andaluciae wrote:Regardless of the very real differences in the circumstances surrounding capture of Hussein and bin Laden:
Andaluciae wrote:Hussein: Legal environment certain--to be tried in Iraq, bin Laden: What the fuck do we do with this guy?

by Andaluciae » Wed May 04, 2011 8:02 am
Andaluciae wrote:Regardless of the very real differences in the circumstances surrounding capture of Hussein and bin Laden:
Yes, regardless of the very different circumstances, the refusal to show the body or a picture of it to anyone is a pretty clear sign that something isn't right.
Andaluciae wrote:Hussein: Legal environment certain--to be tried in Iraq, bin Laden: What the fuck do we do with this guy?
US currently operates more c-camps than any other nation, so the same as what's being done with captured terrorist suspects. It's not like US ever cared for jurisdictional issues.
[/quote]
So?
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

by Andaluciae » Wed May 04, 2011 8:10 am
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

by Vault 1 » Wed May 04, 2011 8:17 am
Andaluciae wrote:Besides the fact that the President of the United States seems a substantially more credible witness than just some random Nazi fuckwads?
Andaluciae wrote:Regardless, there's other evidence floating around, including the information that the SEALS seized, the Tweeter who saw this happen, the cohabitants of the building, the courier...
Andaluciae wrote:This is Osama bin Laden we're talking about
Andaluciae wrote:And c-camps? Do you stutter when you type or something?
Andaluciae wrote:Image and perception, while important for all politicians, were exceptionally important for President Bush,

by Andaluciae » Wed May 04, 2011 8:41 am
Andaluciae wrote:Regardless, there's other evidence floating around, including the information that the SEALS seized, the Tweeter who saw this happen, the cohabitants of the building, the courier...
All anyone has seen - at least anyone who came out publicly - is US forces storming a home and killing some Arabs.
Andaluciae wrote:This is Osama bin Laden we're talking about
Big deal. A retired terrorist leader famous mostly for one act.
Andaluciae wrote:And c-camps? Do you stutter when you type or something?
Shorthand for concentration. I don't use the term because of the analogy, but in function, this is what they are, camps serving for collecting suspects.
Andaluciae wrote:Image and perception, while important for all politicians, were exceptionally important for President Bush,
Much less so than for Obama. He's ultra-populist, he's a professional speaker, he's constantly trying to appear to cater to everyone.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

by UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Wed May 04, 2011 8:55 am

by Vault 1 » Wed May 04, 2011 9:03 am
Andaluciae wrote:Eh? The US has claimed to have killed bin Laden before?
And the surrounding circumstances, of a house with an abnormally high, razor-wire topped wall...
Further, Osama bin Laden wasn't "a retired terrorist leader" in any possible comprehension of the word retired. He remained fully active within the leadership of Al Qaeda as the spiritual guide and primary provider of legitimacy.

by Andaluciae » Wed May 04, 2011 9:12 am
And the surrounding circumstances, of a house with an abnormally high, razor-wire topped wall...
Could be expected of a lot of people that have enemies. Chances are, even actually a terrorist supporter.
What most likely happened is that US got intel that Osama is dead, so the government won't be embarrassed the second time. They raided someone, likely actually linked to Al Qaeda or a part of it. Then shot him up beyond recognition, dumped into the sea, and claimed they killed Osama.
I mean, I'd do the same thing in Obama's shoes. Can't have terrorists celebrating the 10th Anniversary and Osama's victory.
Further, Osama bin Laden wasn't "a retired terrorist leader" in any possible comprehension of the word retired. He remained fully active within the leadership of Al Qaeda as the spiritual guide and primary provider of legitimacy.
Nothing has been heard of him or from him for years. Much unlike his very public presence before.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bahrimontagn, Barsedia, Cuba 2022 RP, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Ifreann, Lord Dominator, Ostroeuropa, Rary, Reich of the New World Order, Stellar Colonies, The Jamesian Republic, The North Polish Union, Zurkerx
Advertisement