NATION

PASSWORD

Bin Laden is dead Megathread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Noavak
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 100
Founded: Mar 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Noavak » Wed May 04, 2011 1:06 am

Vault 1 wrote:-snip-


Bullshit.

Do you understand that DNA tests has confirmed that OBL is dead? Yes or no?

Do you understand that USA wanted to avoid OBL's grave being enshrined by his supporters? Yes or no?

Do you understand that his family, allies, and even Al Qaeda have all confirmed that OBL is, in fact, dead? Yes or no?

Its generally demeaning to oneself to make blatant, false claims to an established truth, mmmkay? Mmmkay.
Noavak Federation (MT Factbook) - Federation of Noavak Colonies (FT Factbook) - Noavak Foreign Relations Program (MT)

Sorratsin wrote:It's just dick-waving, one of mankind's oldest political traditions.


Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:We've never entered into war lightly. We tend not to interfere in other people's squabbles. But we will damn well lay the smackdown on anyone who ends up proving they deserve it, and then some.


Sagatagan wrote:"'Here, young man, your hormones are raging. Let's go in this bedroom, and we'll engage in some homosexual acts. You'll find you like it.'"

User avatar
Vault 1
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1381
Founded: Sep 29, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Vault 1 » Wed May 04, 2011 1:10 am

Noavak wrote:Do you understand that DNA tests has confirmed that OBL is dead? Yes or no?

DNA tests don't test for death. They test for DNA matches or similarities. Obtaining a piece of DNA isn't the same as killing someone.


Noavak wrote:Do you understand that USA wanted to avoid OBL's grave being enshrined by his supporters? Yes or no?

Bullshit. A shrine to OBL, controlled by US, would be a good thing for the US. It's like a superhighway to Guantanamo Bay.


Noavak wrote:claims to an established truth

Truth is established when proof is presented. No proof has been presented. Zero.

User avatar
Noavak
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 100
Founded: Mar 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Noavak » Wed May 04, 2011 1:18 am

Vault 1 wrote:DNA tests don't test for death. They test for DNA matches or similarities. Obtaining a piece of DNA isn't the same as killing someone.


DNA taken from a dead body however, do, in fact prove that said individual is the aforementioned dead individual (admittedly, I worded that a bit screwy).

Bullshit. A shrine to OBL, controlled by US, would be a good thing for the US. It's like a superhighway to Guantanamo Bay.


Bullshit. No shrine at all is the best thing for the US. We need not live in constant hatred of the man and his memory is better forgotten to the annuals of history instead of being remembered constantly.

Truth is established when proof is presented. No proof has been presented. Zero.


Al Quaeda has vowed vengenece for the death of OBL. Key phrase: AL QUAEDA has vowed VENGENANCE FOR THE DEATH OF OBL!!!

An admission that OBL is dead by the very organization he led - holy shit. The mother fucker is dead and in hell.
Noavak Federation (MT Factbook) - Federation of Noavak Colonies (FT Factbook) - Noavak Foreign Relations Program (MT)

Sorratsin wrote:It's just dick-waving, one of mankind's oldest political traditions.


Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:We've never entered into war lightly. We tend not to interfere in other people's squabbles. But we will damn well lay the smackdown on anyone who ends up proving they deserve it, and then some.


Sagatagan wrote:"'Here, young man, your hormones are raging. Let's go in this bedroom, and we'll engage in some homosexual acts. You'll find you like it.'"

User avatar
Vault 1
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1381
Founded: Sep 29, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Vault 1 » Wed May 04, 2011 1:26 am

Noavak wrote:DNA taken from a dead body however, do, in fact prove that said individual is the aforementioned dead individual (admittedly, I worded that a bit screwy).

What proof has been presented that any DNA that has been taken, if any has been taken, was taken from a dead body? The source claiming this is the same source making all other claims.


Noavak wrote:Al Quaeda has vowed vengenece for the death of OBL. Key phrase: AL QUAEDA has vowed VENGENANCE FOR THE DEATH OF OBL!!!

So what? Anything that rallies people for a cause is good for the purpose. Of course their recruitment campaigns will use this to rally people. Then they might switch to "Osama is not dead", or might not.

User avatar
Florin and Atlantis
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 164
Founded: Apr 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Florin and Atlantis » Wed May 04, 2011 1:29 am

Vault 1 wrote:So what? Anything that rallies people for a cause is good for the purpose. Of course their recruitment campaigns will use this to rally people. Then they might switch to "Osama is not dead", or might not.

You really should check up on Al Qaeda's twitter

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Wed May 04, 2011 1:39 am

So.. various people have tried to report this as a crime, stating that "the soldiers killed an unarmed man in his home, ditched his body into the ocean, and proudly confessed this on tv".

Where does their reasoning fail ?
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Vault 1
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1381
Founded: Sep 29, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Vault 1 » Wed May 04, 2011 1:42 am

Florin and Atlantis wrote:You really should check up on Al Qaeda's twitter

Sorry, it's not my kind of read, even if it has nothing to do with Al Qaeda.

User avatar
Florin and Atlantis
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 164
Founded: Apr 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Florin and Atlantis » Wed May 04, 2011 1:47 am

The Alma Mater wrote:So.. various people have tried to report this as a crime, stating that "the soldiers killed an unarmed man in his home, ditched his body into the ocean, and proudly confessed this on tv".

Where does their reasoning fail ?


It fails because they are questioning the good old USA, that's why! USA! USA! USA! WOOO! We all know that everything the USA ever does is legal, that the US government is above the law, that if this had happened on US soil by another country to one of our leaders/celebrities/defectors from other countries it would be a terrorist attack and a declaration of war, and that this country was founded on being awesome or something like that. So, what happened on the Celebrity Apprentice the other night besides Obama rudely interrupting it?

User avatar
Christmahanikwanzikah
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12073
Founded: Nov 24, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Christmahanikwanzikah » Wed May 04, 2011 2:26 am

The Alma Mater wrote:So.. various people have tried to report this as a crime, stating that "the soldiers killed an unarmed man in his home, ditched his body into the ocean, and proudly confessed this on tv".

Where does their reasoning fail ?


a) He (apparently) resisted capture, and
b) He's a man known to have had a hand in the deaths of hundreds, if not thousands, of civilians.

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Wed May 04, 2011 2:43 am

Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:So.. various people have tried to report this as a crime, stating that "the soldiers killed an unarmed man in his home, ditched his body into the ocean, and proudly confessed this on tv".

Where does their reasoning fail ?


a) He (apparently) resisted capture, and
b) He's a man known to have had a hand in the deaths of hundreds, if not thousands, of civilians.


a. is not an argument. It was not the police with a warrant; it was men with guns breaking into his home. Men with explicit orders to kill him.
b. can we kill all massmurderers without a trial ? Can we ? Please ?
Last edited by The Alma Mater on Wed May 04, 2011 2:44 am, edited 2 times in total.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Cameroi
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15788
Founded: Dec 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Cameroi » Wed May 04, 2011 2:48 am

was it JUST pakistan who might have known all along where he was? or was it not the u.s. as well?

this is pure speculation of course, but isn't it possible bush knew where bin laden was from the beginning, and passed that along to obama when he took office too?
isn't it not only possible but probable, that al quida was created as political fodder from jump, as an excuse for the erosion of political and civil rights in america, and their prevention elsewhere, as a convenience to mindless, conscienceless, economic interests?

i honestly do not believe the events of 9-11 2001 were planned outside of the circle of pseudo-conservative politico-economic interests within the u.s., however much this so called al quida, may have been the tool and the instrument that carried them out.
truth isn't what i say. isn't what you say. isn't what anybody says. truth is what is there, when no one is saying anything.

"economic freedom" is "the cake"
=^^=
.../\...

User avatar
New Hayesalia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7454
Founded: Jul 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Hayesalia » Wed May 04, 2011 2:54 am

Cameroi wrote:was it JUST pakistan who might have known all along where he was? or was it not the u.s. as well?

this is pure speculation of course, but isn't it possible bush knew where bin laden was from the beginning, and passed that along to obama when he took office too?
isn't it not only possible but probable, that al quida was created as political fodder from jump, as an excuse for the erosion of political and civil rights in america, and their prevention elsewhere, as a convenience to mindless, conscienceless, economic interests?

i honestly do not believe the events of 9-11 2001 were planned outside of the circle of pseudo-conservative politico-economic interests within the u.s., however much this so called al quida, may have been the tool and the instrument that carried them out.


And the ultimate motive being...?

User avatar
Holy Marsh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5616
Founded: Nov 09, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Holy Marsh » Wed May 04, 2011 3:06 am

New Hayesalia wrote:
Cameroi wrote:was it JUST pakistan who might have known all along where he was? or was it not the u.s. as well?

this is pure speculation of course, but isn't it possible bush knew where bin laden was from the beginning, and passed that along to obama when he took office too?
isn't it not only possible but probable, that al quida was created as political fodder from jump, as an excuse for the erosion of political and civil rights in america, and their prevention elsewhere, as a convenience to mindless, conscienceless, economic interests?

i honestly do not believe the events of 9-11 2001 were planned outside of the circle of pseudo-conservative politico-economic interests within the u.s., however much this so called al quida, may have been the tool and the instrument that carried them out.


And the ultimate motive being...?



powermoneyevil.

Get with the lunatic program already.
Friend of Kraven, 2005-2023
18 years of stories deleted
Kraven Prevails!

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41634
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed May 04, 2011 3:21 am

The Alma Mater wrote:So.. various people have tried to report this as a crime, stating that "the soldiers killed an unarmed man in his home, ditched his body into the ocean, and proudly confessed this on tv".

Where does their reasoning fail ?

It's not exactly like he was just a local meth dealer or something. The only real thing that separates him from a traditional enemy is a recognized set of borders. Does he get a pass because he had an unconventional army? You can't shoot back if he doesn't put on a costume? He didn't rob the first national bank, he declared open war on the US and its allies. Now, granted if I did that at worst a man in a suit might show up and say, "No, you don't." But he actually successfully commanded an army that has attacked the US on its own soil as well as abroad. He was an enemy combatant and was dealt with as such. I've never heard of a restriction indicating you were not allowed to target leadership. He was an unconventional enemy, but that doesn't mean he automatically goes all the way down to 'common criminal.' I mean, it's a cute game to play, but really doesn't stand up.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Wed May 04, 2011 3:54 am

Vault 1 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Burial at sea was an obvious choice so as to not create a grave that could become a site of pilgrimage for his followers.

What's wrong with creating a site of pilgrimage for his followers? Just create it close enough to Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo Bay that you can save on gas hauling everyone coming there.


The same reason "We fight them over there so we don't have to fight them here" was such a spectacular success. Good luck arresting and extraditing every single individual who so much as wanders near the hypothetical Bin Laden shrine. Gitmo has only so much space, and I doubt black sites are spacy. Hell of an unneccessary financial drain even assuming Al'Qaeda or some other group doesn't make it a permanent shrine or base. And it sure as hell wouldn't be in a country friendly to the U.S. so good luck with the constant bombing attempts!
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Wed May 04, 2011 3:58 am

Rambhutan wrote:
Vault 1 wrote:Just a couple days ago, I actually thought that OBL might be dead. Not necessarily, but was willing to give it a good probability.

The "burial at sea" news have really caused me to laugh out loud. All doubt that this might not be a fake has vaporized. It's not like he is a sailor or something - there would be no serious reason for burial at sea.


Oh ffs, if that is your idea of all the evidence you need to conclude that all this is fake then you are a conspiracy nut. Burial at sea was an obvious choice so as to not create a grave that could become a site of pilgrimage for his followers.


And it is completely in line with Islamic rules for burying people who have many enemies that would be willing to defile the body.

Of course, they could have buried him on the Moon. Surely that would fit - the moon being a symbol of Islam and all.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Vader sama
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Apr 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vader sama » Wed May 04, 2011 4:03 am

well, easy come easy go...

User avatar
Andaluciae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5766
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Andaluciae » Wed May 04, 2011 4:39 am

Cameroi wrote:was it JUST pakistan who might have known all along where he was? or was it not the u.s. as well?

this is pure speculation of course, but isn't it possible bush knew where bin laden was from the beginning, and passed that along to obama when he took office too?
isn't it not only possible but probable, that al quida was created as political fodder from jump, as an excuse for the erosion of political and civil rights in america, and their prevention elsewhere, as a convenience to mindless, conscienceless, economic interests?

i honestly do not believe the events of 9-11 2001 were planned outside of the circle of pseudo-conservative politico-economic interests within the u.s., however much this so called al quida, may have been the tool and the instrument that carried them out.


No, and to contend that Al Qaida is something of a hyper-longevity false-flag operation is absurd. False flags tend to either be poorly constructed, turfgrass type of entities (think the swift boat folks) or one-off and structure free. Not only that, but creating Al Qaida would leave a trail: At least some evidence, other than what one cooks up in thought experiments, would exist. None of that describes Al Qaida, and the claim that they are can be categorically dismissed.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159050
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed May 04, 2011 4:44 am

This totally warrants another thread.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed May 04, 2011 4:46 am

Who cares, good luck, and the fact that they couldn't stop us.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Wed May 04, 2011 4:47 am

I imagine the circumstances are harder than we really understand. For example, was he reaching for a weapon? Was the woman he was with? Were the children? Did he try to push or grab something when he was told to stop?

We assume (also don't post big ass pics on posts) from some bare facts the reality of the case, when we really just don't know. In the heat of things, you're aren't being overly cautious, you are making sure you accomplish your mission, that your team and you live. I know it has become somewhat of a cliche in counter-terrorist shows, but they hold some truth in them. Accidents happen. But again, we really don't have enough details.

User avatar
Sea Captains Folly
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Sep 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sea Captains Folly » Wed May 04, 2011 4:47 am

I love how he was hiding in a $1,000,000 mansion. Now do we honestly think America didn't see it? A 1m compound right outside the perimeter of what looks like a favela. I mean lets be honest no one is that stupid. Precisley when this had been going for like 10 years. So I connect the dots with 400 terriosts escaping and the death of Osama. He could of kept hiding I don't know what was stopping America from just going in and killing him before (Besides Pakistans permission) buy I'll let you be creative but I believe that they agreed to release those 400 prisoners in exchange for the life of Osama. Its only logical (from the news I have heard thus far) that they have not recaptured or even chased down one (runaway terriost).
Last edited by Sea Captains Folly on Wed May 04, 2011 4:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
もたらす混乱。私はラインを通過するよう求めた、この瞬間を感じるように私の意志をフィード。手を差し伸べるランダムを包含する。
手を差し伸べる何が来るかもしれない包含する。
私は自分の欲望を受け入れる...私は自分の欲望を受け入れる...、リズムを感じる十分につながっていると感じると身を引くと未亡人のように泣き、インスピレーションを感じるように電源を理解するのに目撃者の美しさに、噴水で入浴するスパイラルでスイングするスパイラルでスイングする私たちの神性のスパイラルのスイングにはまだ人間である。地面に足では、私は音の間に自分自身を失い、インチ、それを吸うために広く開放私はそれが私の肌を越えて移動する感じ。私は達していると手を差し伸べる。私は、またはどのような私を混乱させるが、ランダムに手を伸ばしている何が私を混乱させるでしょう。そして、我々の意志と風を次の私たちは誰もされましたどこへ行く可能性があります。我々は、最後にスパイラルに乗るよただ、誰もされましたどこへ行く可能性があります。アウトスパイラル。行ってください。

User avatar
Andaluciae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5766
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Andaluciae » Wed May 04, 2011 4:49 am

Vault 1 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Oh ffs, if that is your idea of all the evidence you need to conclude that all this is fake then you are a conspiracy nut.

No, I'm not. Here in the internet, we have an expression: "pics or it didn't happen". There were no pics, and now the body has been mysteriously buried at sea. The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim - in this case, the claim that OBL has been killed. This burden has not been satisfied.


Rambhutan wrote:Burial at sea was an obvious choice so as to not create a grave that could become a site of pilgrimage for his followers.

What's wrong with creating a site of pilgrimage for his followers? Just create it close enough to Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo Bay that you can save on gas hauling everyone coming there.


So...is Hitler dead? How about Genghis Khan? No bodies, no pictures. They must still be alive.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54742
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed May 04, 2011 4:52 am

Ugly Ants wrote:Is it ethical to kill an unarmed man?

No. On the other hand, he was the leader of a criminal organization that declared "war" on both US and Pakistan (yeah, technically a criminally organization can't issue a formal declaration of war... but there you are). So, it's either "surrender or be shot on the spot" usually. Just as if you try to break and run through a police checkpost.

What if they killed the wrong guy?

It would have been a crime.

What if Bin Laden wasn’t that responsible for 911 but just a distant fan?

Evidence pointed to him, and he claimed responsibility. And not JUST for 9/11.

Who gave USA the authority to enter another country and just kill someone?

The fact that the Pakistani gov't exists because of US funding, I guess.

What if some Muslim president feels he can now order his intelligence service to execute some Bush jr?

I'd love to see them trying... both if they succeed or fail ;)

I would have liked it, if he was brought in front of a court. That’s how it works in a civilized society. Now, we are not much better than Muslim terrorists like Bin Laden.

I would have loved to see him dragged in front of a court. On the other hand, I don't find the killing of Bin Laden much regrettable. For sure, not more than the carpet-bombings carried out by US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Last edited by Risottia on Wed May 04, 2011 4:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Andaluciae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5766
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Andaluciae » Wed May 04, 2011 4:54 am

Sea Captains Folly wrote:I love how he was hiding in a $1,000,000 mansion. Now do we honestly think America didn't see it? A 1m compound right outside the perimeter of what looks like a favela. I mean lets be honest no one is that stupid. Precisley when this had been going for like 10 years. So I connect the dots with 400 terriosts escaping and the death of Osama. He could of kept hiding I don't know what was stopping America from just going in and killing him before (Besides Pakistans permission) buy I'll let you be creative but I believe that they agreed to release those 400 prisoners in exchange for the life of Osama. Its only logical (from the news I have heard thus far) that they have not recaptured or even chased down one (runaway terriost).


As a former employee of the defense establishment: Are you fucking kidding me? I'm flatters you think so much of our skills, but your expectations are severely misplaced.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bahrimontagn, Barsedia, Cuba 2022 RP, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Ifreann, Immoren, Lord Dominator, Not Gagium, Ostroeuropa, Rary, Reich of the New World Order, Stellar Colonies, The Jamesian Republic, The North Polish Union, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads