Why Are People So Critical About Christian Beliefs

[Roman Cilicia]

If you were truly a scientist as you claim, you'd know that none of what you said is true, and your so-called treatments generally only cause real problems.

If you were truly a scientist, you wouldn't be parroting the opinions of the lower-class scientific consensus, which is all run and financed by the zionists.

Hence, I am certain that you are not of the scientific school.

[-St George]

O for fuck sake.

Homosexuality is not caused by a defect. It's not caused by anything! In the same way that heterosexuality isn't caused by anything.

The whole defect myth was entirely invented by bigots that wanted to make homosexuality seem 'wrong', and to repeat that piece of bullshit makes you just as much a bigot as those who invented this morally and factually wrong 'theory'.

While I'm not trying to say that homosexuality is wrong, it probably is some sort of defect. Sexuality exists for the purpose of reproduction. With homosexuality it doesn't work, which makes it pointless. There's a reason why only 1% of the population is gay.

Olawd. Aside from the disputed and discredited figure you're using, you mix up 'sexuality' with a more base, animalistic concept of wanting to reproduce, to do your bit for the pack/tribe etc.

[Georgism]

If you were truly a scientist as you claim, you'd know that none of what you said is true, and your so-called treatments generally only cause real problems.

If you were truly a scientist, you wouldn't be parroting the opinions of the lower-class scientific consensus, which is all run and financed by the zionists.

Hence, I am certain that you are not of the scientific school.

rofl

[Ceannairceach]

If you were truly a scientist as you claim, you'd know that none of what you said is true, and your so-called treatments generally only cause real problems.

If you were truly a scientist, you wouldn't be parroting the opinions of the lower-class scientific consensus, which is all run and financed by the zionists.

Hence, I am certain that you are not of the scientific school.

Trolling doesn't do you any favors, friend.

Though, rereading some of your posts, I now think you are New Nick under a new name.

[Roman Cilicia]

I was introduced to Nicsylvania recently, and he seems to me a trollish ruffian and a charlatan of the ED/4-chan school.

[Katganistan]

He could grow up and become leader of a nation... Just think of the positive benefit to mankind in that!

Create jobs ! Fight overpopulation ! Make the trains run on time !

The trains running on time was Mussolini.

[Katganistan]

O for fuck sake.

Homosexuality is not caused by a defect. It's not caused by anything! In the same way that heterosexuality isn't caused by anything.

The whole defect myth was entirely invented by bigots that wanted to make homosexuality seem 'wrong', and to repeat that piece of bullshit makes you just as much a bigot as those who invented this morally and factually wrong 'theory'.

While I'm not trying to say that homosexuality is wrong, it probably is some sort of defect. Sexuality exists for the purpose of reproduction. With homosexuality it doesn't work, which makes it pointless. There's a reason why only 1% of the population is gay.

If it exists for the purpose of reproduction then why are there so many people having sex and NOT having kids?
And what about same gender paired animals?

[Georgism]

If it exists for the purpose of reproduction then why are there so many people having sex and NOT having kids?
And what about same gender paired animals?

Satan did it

[Dyakovo]

While I'm not trying to say that homosexuality is wrong, it probably is some sort of defect. Sexuality exists for the purpose of reproduction. With homosexuality it doesn't work, which makes it pointless. There's a reason why only 1% of the population is gay.

You're right of course; I like to claim I am an accredited scientist on internet forums despite constantly demonstrating that I, in fact, have less knowledge of science then your average third graderand I can assure you, homosexuality is caused by both a mental imbalance in the brain, due to an accumulation of the sanguine and choleric humours, and the environment. Bloodletting and the administration of certain emetics have been proven to treat "homosexuality" of the first kind, while a simple harsh talk and psychological treatment cures the second.

Fixed

[Unilisia]

A real question would be "Why are people so critical about the belief's of Atheists ?"

[Big Jim P]

If it exists for the purpose of reproduction then why are there so many people having sex and NOT having kids?
And what about same gender paired animals?

Satan did it

Nope. Definitely not getting blamed for this one!

[Tekania]

While I'm not trying to say that homosexuality is wrong, it probably is some sort of defect. Sexuality exists for the purpose of reproduction. With homosexuality it doesn't work, which makes it pointless. There's a reason why only 1% of the population is gay.

If it exists for the purpose of reproduction then why are there so many people having sex and NOT having kids?
And what about same gender paired animals?

More importantly there are also many other pointless endeavors... Playing Call of Duty on a Xbox360 for example, or dining at fancy restaurants, and posting on internet forums (such as this one) that I am most sure, given the unnatural element of such and the pointlessness of the act that Scottish Workers is just as opposed to.

[Roman Cilicia]

Fixed

Truly, you miscontrue me.

For you see, my theory goes like this - the scientific consensuses of the past 2 millenia have been proven wrong, and any man who expresses the opinion, say, that the Earth is flat or that the square root of two must be rational is mocked endlessly in this time. Though many theories have come into vogue, they have almost all been refuted.

Yet what exactly makes our modern-day theories any more correct? For they are based upon the same inputs! In another century, they will laugh at us and call us idiots and troglodytes for embracing the theories that are currently popular. And in a hundred years, those ideas of the near future, too, will be criticized!

The theories that are in consensus today are all theoretical, though, not practical, unlike the tried and tested ideas of the past two centuries. Whence my belief that that was the time that science reached its peak, it's pinnacle - the modes of today are hardly more relevant, and will be put down just as soundly in the coming years.

And all in all, I prefer those theories that brings results: Phrenology, Humourism, Esotericism, etc.

[Dyakovo]

Fixed

Truly, you miscontrue have me spot on.

Fixed

[Terra Agora]

While I'm not trying to say that homosexuality is wrong, it probably is some sort of defect. Sexuality exists for the purpose of reproduction. With homosexuality it doesn't work, which makes it pointless. There's a reason why only 1% of the population is gay.

You're right of course; I am an accredited scientist and I can assure you, homosexuality is caused by both a mental imbalance in the brain, due to an accumulation of the sanguine and choleric humours, and the environment. Bloodletting and the administration of certain emetics have been proven to treat "homosexuality" of the first kind, while a simple harsh talk and psychological treatment cures the second.

If your such an accredited scientist where is your Wikipedia page?

Yeah thats what I though...

[Roman Cilicia]

You're right of course; I am an accredited scientist and I can assure you, homosexuality is caused by both a mental imbalance in the brain, due to an accumulation of the sanguine and choleric humours, and the environment. Bloodletting and the administration of certain emetics have been proven to treat "homosexuality" of the first kind, while a simple harsh talk and psychological treatment cures the second.

If your such an accredited scientist where is your Wikipedia page?

---

Yeah thats what I though...

Accredited simply means you have a degree.

[Terra Agora]

If your such an accredited scientist where is your Wikipedia page?

---

Yeah thats what I though...

Accredited simply means you have a degree.

Meh different used of the word.

I would of thought it is more genetical. (sexuality)

[Ceannairceach]

If your such an accredited scientist where is your Wikipedia page?

---

Yeah thats what I though...

Accredited simply means you have a degree.

Ah, but if I am not mistaken, you also declared yourself famous.

[Roman Cilicia]

Accredited simply means you have a degree.

Ah, but if I am not mistaken, you also declared yourself famous.

When did I do that? Point me to a quote or other source.

[Ceannairceach]

Ah, but if I am not mistaken, you also declared yourself famous.

When did I do that? Point me to a quote or other source.

Hint: Roman Cilicia is a troll. He claimed to be a high level professional biologist, then later claimed he was actually a professional (and very famous) phrenologist with at least a few Nazi friends. Now he's changing his story again and trolling about mysticism.

I am all three of these things, being well-travelled as I am; I have not uselessly tied myself down to a single profession as madmen are wont to do.

It can be taken as you confirming to be famous, though I was mistaken; you never outright said it.

[Roman Cilicia]

I am all three of these things, being well-travelled as I am; I have not uselessly tied myself down to a single profession as madmen are wont to do.

It can be taken as you confirming to be famous, though I was mistaken; you never outright said it.

Well, last year I attended a Phrenology conference hosted by Basmanov and co. in Volgograd. I was the guest speaker. Pretty famous in that field.

So yes, I am well-known among the phrenology community, but not famous in general. Unfortunately, the modern media are too obsessed with Justin Bieber, the Beatles, etc. to pay attention to my pursuit of the truth!

[Ceannairceach]

It can be taken as you confirming to be famous, though I was mistaken; you never outright said it.

Well, last year I attended a Phrenology conference hosted by Basmanov and co. in Volgograd. I was the guest speaker. Pretty famous in that field.

So yes, I am well-known among the phrenology community, but not famous in general. Unfortunately, the modern media are too obsessed with Justin Bieber, the Beatles, etc. to pay attention to my pursuit of the truth!

I'm pretty sure, then, that you can source the conference and your name under a guest list of some sort?

[Unilisia]

Well, last year I attended a Phrenology conference hosted by Basmanov and co. in Volgograd. I was the guest speaker. Pretty famous in that field.

So yes, I am well-known among the phrenology community, but not famous in general. Unfortunately, the modern media are too obsessed with Justin Bieber, the Beatles, etc. to pay attention to my pursuit of the truth!

I'm pretty sure, then, that you can source the conference and your name under a guest list of some sort?

[Roman Cilicia]

Well, last year I attended a Phrenology conference hosted by Basmanov and co. in Volgograd. I was the guest speaker. Pretty famous in that field.

So yes, I am well-known among the phrenology community, but not famous in general. Unfortunately, the modern media are too obsessed with Justin Bieber, the Beatles, etc. to pay attention to my pursuit of the truth!

I'm pretty sure, then, that you can source the conference and your name under a guest list of some sort?

I'll gladly fax you the brochure and conference plans. May I ask your fax number? Feel free to telegram it to me.

[Unilisia]

I'm pretty sure, then, that you can source the conference and your name under a guest list of some sort?

I'll gladly fax you the brochure and conference plans. May I ask your fax number? Feel free to telegram it to me.

Or you can find it on the web, and post it here.