And that is why religions don't get to claim to be logical when they aren't. That still isn't a reason to not rip everything that they say apart.
Advertisement

by Salandriagado » Fri May 20, 2011 1:51 pm

by Norstal » Fri May 20, 2011 1:51 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Brandenburg-Altmark » Fri May 20, 2011 1:52 pm

by Conserative Morality » Fri May 20, 2011 1:53 pm
Norstal wrote:What did you find on pro-atheist websites?

by Samuraikoku » Fri May 20, 2011 1:53 pm

by Norstal » Fri May 20, 2011 1:55 pm

Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by -St George » Fri May 20, 2011 1:55 pm

by Conserative Morality » Fri May 20, 2011 1:57 pm
-St George wrote:Or quotes from the Bible taken out of context, or quotes from Bible versions whereby certain phrases have been written. The latter, of course, isn't the fault of said websites, but when they try to use said quotes as representing Christianity as a whole, then they are lying.

by Freelanderness » Fri May 20, 2011 1:59 pm
Salandriagado wrote:Ahem?
As I said - the basis of Christianity openly advocates bigotry. I suggest reading the bible some time.
Salandriagado wrote:First you said
But then you said
Isn't that somewhat of a paradox?
Not in the slightest - you are free to believe whatever you like, but you are not in any way free to impose it on others or claim some kind of special exception from being ripped apart, analysed and otherwise abused. Every single scientific theory gets that, every idea receives it. You don't get an exception from this rule.
Salandriagado wrote:
The principle of religion is to believe in a God.
The principle of religion is to accept a positive claim (the existence of a god) in the absence of positive evidence.
. ♕ I am your LORD and saviour, for I am Jesus Christina Confess your sins, and ye shall be forgiven. ❤ .
One of Le Sexiest NSers 2013. Call me ₭¡††¥. Now a fascist because rape is bad, mmkay.
Meet the TET Pantheon"What I hope most of all is that you understand what I mean when I tell you that, even though I do not know you, and even though I may never meet you, laugh with you cry with you or kiss you, I love you." - Evey (V for Vendetta)

by Samuraikoku » Fri May 20, 2011 2:01 pm

by Norstal » Fri May 20, 2011 2:02 pm

Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Norstal » Fri May 20, 2011 2:03 pm
-St George wrote:Or quotes from the Bible taken out of context, or quotes from Bible versions whereby certain phrases have been written. The latter, of course, isn't the fault of said websites, but when they try to use said quotes as representing Christianity as a whole, then they are lying.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by -St George » Fri May 20, 2011 2:07 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:-St George wrote:Or quotes from the Bible taken out of context, or quotes from Bible versions whereby certain phrases have been written. The latter, of course, isn't the fault of said websites, but when they try to use said quotes as representing Christianity as a whole, then they are lying.
So what you're saying is that the Bible does not advocate bigotry at all.
Really?

by Freelanderness » Fri May 20, 2011 2:17 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:-St George wrote:Or quotes from the Bible taken out of context, or quotes from Bible versions whereby certain phrases have been written. The latter, of course, isn't the fault of said websites, but when they try to use said quotes as representing Christianity as a whole, then they are lying.
So what you're saying is that the Bible does not advocate bigotry at all.
Really?

. ♕ I am your LORD and saviour, for I am Jesus Christina Confess your sins, and ye shall be forgiven. ❤ .
One of Le Sexiest NSers 2013. Call me ₭¡††¥. Now a fascist because rape is bad, mmkay.
Meet the TET Pantheon"What I hope most of all is that you understand what I mean when I tell you that, even though I do not know you, and even though I may never meet you, laugh with you cry with you or kiss you, I love you." - Evey (V for Vendetta)

by Salandriagado » Fri May 20, 2011 2:17 pm
Or quotes from the Bible taken out of context, or quotes from Bible versions whereby certain phrases have been written. The latter, of course, isn't the fault of said websites, but when they try to use said quotes as representing Christianity as a whole, then they are lying.
No, it doesn't. I suggest you try actually reading the Bible, and not what you find on pro-atheist websites.

by Galga tha » Fri May 20, 2011 2:19 pm

by Norstal » Fri May 20, 2011 2:22 pm
Galga tha wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:To quote the amazing book, The Kite Runner, there is but one sin: The sin of thievery. And he has just stolen the judgement that is gifted to God and God alone.
From everything you've said, books are lies. You can't quote a lie, that's just embracing a lie. Ans yes, you'll say God is a lie, but you can say whatever you want. I don't mind. It's your life, do what you want with it.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Conserative Morality » Fri May 20, 2011 2:22 pm
Freelanderness wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:So what you're saying is that the Bible does not advocate bigotry at all.
Really?
The Bible actually specifically condemns bigotry
Do not judge, so that you may not be judged. For with the judgment you make you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get. Why do you see the speck in your neighbor's eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye? Or how can you say to your neighbor, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' while the log is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your neighbor's eye. (NRSV, Matthew 7:1-5)
Then Jesus told this story to some who had great self-confidence and scorned everyone else: "Two men went to the Temple to pray. One was a Pharisee, and the other was a dishonest tax collector. The proud Pharisee stood by himself and prayed this prayer: 'I thank you, God, that I am not a sinner like everyone else, especially like that tax collector over there! For I never cheat, I don't sin, I don't commit adultery, I fast twice a week, and I give you a tenth of my income.' But the tax collector stood at a distance and dared not even lift his eyes to heaven as he prayed. Instead, he beat his chest in sorrow, saying, 'O God, be merciful to me, for I am a sinner.' I tell you, this sinner, not the Pharisee, returned home justified before God. For the proud will be humbled, but the humble will be honored." (NLT, Luke 18:9-14)
You have heard that the law of Moses says, "Love your neighbor and hate your enemy." But I say, love your enemies! Pray for those who persecute you! In that way, you will be acting as true children of your Father in heaven. For he gives his sunlight to both the evil and the good, and he sends rain on the just and on the unjust, too. If you love only those who love you, what good is that? Even corrupt tax collectors do that much. If you are kind only to your friends, how are you different from anyone else? Even pagans do that. But you are to be perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect. (NLT, Matthew 5:43-48)
Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for he who loves his fellowman has fulfilled the law. The commandments, "Do not commit adultery," "Do not murder," "Do not steal," "Do not covet," and whatever other commandment there may be, are summed up in this one rule: "Love your neighbor as yourself." Love does no harm to its neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law. (NIV, Romans 13:8-10)
And my personal favourite:
We love because he first loved us. Those who say, "I love God," and hate their brothers or sisters, are liars; for those who do not love a brother or sister whom they have seen, cannot love God whom they have not seen. The commandment we have from him is this: those who love God must love their brothers and sisters also. (NRSV, 1 John 4:19-21)

by Samuraikoku » Fri May 20, 2011 2:22 pm


by Salandriagado » Fri May 20, 2011 2:27 pm
Not at all. In several places, especially in the Old Testament, the Bible advocates Bigotry. I am saying that the teachings of Christ, and the main message of the New Testament, summed up in Mathew 5:43-44: "You have heard that it was said, "Love your neighbor and hate your enemy." But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you", are more important than "God's" set of rules for Jewish Priests (Leviticus) or the Pseudo-Histories of Genesis, Exodus, etc.
The Bible is not 100% right (and some would question whether it is even 1% right, but that's another matter entirely, one can find relevant verses to back up almost every viewpoint), and Christians and Non-Christians alike should question the Bible and the actions of those who claim to be the successors of St Peter etc.
Christianity /=/ Following the Bible word for word.
Also I suggest you read the Bible sometime. The basis of Christianity is love.
Religion is a personal belief. So long as someone isn't trying to tell you that it's the truth for everyone and you have to follow it, I don't see why you would tear it apart. As for the people trying to get Creationism, go after them already! Nobody likes pushy kinds of people like that. Just don't equate them with every other Christian.
And how is that slavery?
From everything you've said, books are lies. You can't quote a lie, that's just embracing a lie. Ans yes, you'll say God is a lie, but you can say whatever you want. I don't mind. It's your life, do what you want with it.

by Ceannairceach » Fri May 20, 2011 2:28 pm
Galga tha wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:To quote the amazing book, The Kite Runner, there is but one sin: The sin of thievery. And he has just stolen the judgement that is gifted to God and God alone.
From everything you've said, books are lies. You can't quote a lie, that's just embracing a lie. Ans yes, you'll say God is a lie, but you can say whatever you want. I don't mind. It's your life, do what you want with it.

by Sociobiology » Fri May 20, 2011 2:37 pm
Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:Dyakovo wrote:How is "lacking belief in a deity" as much of an assertion as theism?
It's the position that something is inherently false while admitting it is unfalsifiable and unverifiable. Personally, I'm still ready to accept a religion the moment it can prove to me it isn't just BS. The moment the Christian God comes down from the sky and says "Hey, believe in me!" is the moment I'll agree he exists.

by Bluth Corporation » Fri May 20, 2011 2:38 pm
Salandriagado wrote:Or quotes from the Bible taken out of context, or quotes from Bible versions whereby certain phrases have been written. The latter, of course, isn't the fault of said websites, but when they try to use said quotes as representing Christianity as a whole, then they are lying.No, it doesn't. I suggest you try actually reading the Bible, and not what you find on pro-atheist websites.
Leviticus 20:13, Deuteronomy 22:5, Exodus 22:18
1 Peter 3:1, Jude 1:5, Hebrews 3:12 (and 11:6 for another interesting point), Titus 3:10-11, 2 Timothy 2:16, 1 Thessalonians 2:15, Galatians 1:8-9, 2 Corinthians 10:5, Romans 1:31-32,
Luke 19:22-27

by Sociobiology » Fri May 20, 2011 2:44 pm
Freelanderness wrote:First you saidSalandriagado wrote:No. We are saying that because a viewpoint exists, it should be torn apart, analysed down to its roots and thoroughly abused. If the opinion can't survive this, there was something wrong with it from the start.
But then you saidSalandriagado wrote:No, no, no, no, no. You are entirely free to believe in a religion.
Isn't that somewhat of a paradox?:S Slaves are men too, and women. By that logic following any major ideas, like capitalism, democracy, any scientific discoveries also means you're a slave.Salandriagado wrote:False equivalence. Whilst it is arguable that capitalism forces a form of slavery in some forms of capitalism (I said arguable, mind you, ancap people), the principle of democracy is to allow people to lead themselves (albeit usually indirectly) and the point of scientific discoveries is that you can check them.
The principle of religion is to believe in a God.

by Samuraikoku » Fri May 20, 2011 2:44 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Breizh-Veur, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Gun Manufacturers, Hurdergaryp, Ostroeuropa, Reich of the New World Order, Tarsonis, The Selkie, The United Penguin Commonwealth
Advertisement