NationStates

Smunkeeville wrote:

JarVik wrote: How come?

Her cum.

I assume.

Kusatsu wrote:

Saint Clair Island wrote:

Kusatsu wrote:Mhm, thought so.

Wasn't talking dictionary decisions. That's just the image I get when people mention being asexual. "Oh, you are? Do you release spores into the atmosphere, or just bud children off after getting fertilized by bees?"

Well fine, give me the word you would use for me and I'll start referring to myself as that instead.

Maurepas wrote:I would say that it would require both Sexuality and Nonsexuality considering that both are a part of Human Nature...

I'm no expert on human nature, oftentimes I pretend no such thing exists because I lack some of the essential components of it (ie: sexual desire). But meh, I don't need to fight to be recognized as a new species... yet.

Saint Clair Island wrote:There's no such thing as human nature. There's just individual nature. One can predict how large groups of people behave, but extrapolating conclusions on how "humans in general" behave from those predictions is fallacious.

Saint Clair Island wrote:I'm rather fond of "weirdo" or "freak", myself.

If you insist, though, "nonsexual" makes more sense... since asexuality is as much a sexual orientation as atheism is a religion.

Saint Clair Island wrote:There's no such thing as human nature. There's just individual nature. One can predict how large groups of people behave, but extrapolating conclusions on how "humans in general" behave from those predictions is fallacious.

Kusatsu wrote:

JarVik wrote:

Kusatsu wrote:
The way I see it, sex is just a waste of time. Other than offspring, I get absolutely nothing out of it. Plus its a bit discomforting of an experience too.

Sex is one of the best wastes of time, and other than offspring your supposed to get off on it.

Discomforting? Seriously? are you sure your doing it right?

Do get me wrong, Its not like I'm saying you should go full turbo slut or manwhore but it is a pleasureable activity when your ready for it.

Well of course it is a waste of time, hell, using the Nation States forums right now is a waste of time. However, being that these forums are entertaining to me, I don't see it as a waste of time. I get something out of it, and that is entertainment.

I simply don't understand why people like sex, and gave up on figuring it out ages ago.

La Habana wrote:Hows about a step beyond anal sex: Felching.

La Habana wrote:Hows about a step beyond anal sex: Felching.

Maerngau wrote:
Believe me, I'm disappointed too I'm glad this topic, uh, came up though so more people know about the risks.

Maurepas wrote:

Saint Clair Island wrote:There's no such thing as human nature. There's just individual nature. One can predict how large groups of people behave, but extrapolating conclusions on how "humans in general" behave from those predictions is fallacious.

I would say there is a such thing as human nature, which I would define as things humans do...

La Habana wrote:Hows about a step beyond anal sex: Felching.

Or a step beyond even that: Snowballing.

Maerngau wrote:

Let's see. . .
http://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/ ... ancer-rise

uly 29, 2009 - Changing sexual practices have led to a dramatic rise in throat cancer in the United States over the past two decades, and experts say they fear an epidemic of the disease.

The comments were made Wednesday at a news conference held by the American Association for Cancer Research to discuss research into the role of the sexually transmitted human papilloma virus ( HPV) in head and neck cancer.

Increasing rates of HPV infection, spread through oral sex, is largely driving the rapid rise in oropharyngeal cancers, which include tumors of the throat, tonsils, and base of the tongue, said Scott Lippman, MD, who chairs the thoracic department at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Studies of oropharyngeal tumor tissue stored 20 years ago show that only around 20% are HPV positive, Lippman said. Today it is estimated that 60% of patients are infected with the virus.

“The percentage of oropharyngeal cancers that are HPV positive is much higher now than it was 20 years ago,” he said. “This is a real trend, and that is why there is concern of an epidemic given that fact that oropharyngeal cancer is increasing at an alarming rate.”
Changing Face of Throat Cancer

Smoking and alcohol abuse were once considered the only major risk factors for these cancers, but this is no longer the case.

American Cancer Society Chief Medical Officer Otis Brawley, MD, said as many as half of the oropharyngeal cancers diagnosed today appear to be caused by HPV infection.

“Changing sexual practices over the last 20 years, especially as they relate to oral sex, are increasing the rate of head and neck cancers and may be increasing the rates of other cancers as well,” he said.

He added that there is some evidence that oral HPV infection is also a risk factor for a type of cancer of the esophagus.

“The paradigm is changing,” Lippman said. “The types of patients we are seeing now with oropharyngeal cancers are not the patients we have classically seen who were older, smokers, and have lots of other problems. These are young people, executives, a whole different population.”
Oral Sex Not Safe Sex

The experts agreed that it is critical for the public to understand that oral sex doesn’t equal safe sex.

The message was unofficially promoted in the early days of the HIV epidemic and it is still widely believed by many, especially teens.

Studies suggest that teens are often unaware of the risks associated with unprotected oral sex, including the transmission of HPV, chlamydia, and gonorrhea.

“There is a huge public health message here,” Brawley said.

Believe me, I'm disappointed too I'm glad this topic, uh, came up though so more people know about the risks.

Parthenon wrote:I have shit to do. I am not going to waste a few hours of my day just rolling around in bed or talking about her feelings when I could be preparing for a presentation at work, studying for class, drinking beer, or hitting on her other sorority sisters. I finish, give her ample time to, then sleep or leave. Its not easy being a publicly traded commodity with a high stock value.

Maerngau wrote: I can think of a few medical reasons - oral performed on a woman can increase the performer's incidence of throat cancer. Which is a shame

New Central Europe wrote:Why would you do Anal Sex or Oral Sex

Maurepas wrote:

Maerngau wrote:
Believe me, I'm disappointed too I'm glad this topic, uh, came up though so more people know about the risks.

Yeah, but I would say that is due to the increase in HPV not to the act itself...Oral sex is just one way it spreads, the act itself doesnt give you cancer, its the avenue of the virus...

just like sneezing doesnt give you a cold, its the virus that spreads from it...That doesnt mean you shouldnt sneeze, however,

Heinleinites wrote:

Parthenon wrote:I have shit to do. I am not going to waste a few hours of my day just rolling around in bed or talking about her feelings when I could be preparing for a presentation at work, studying for class, drinking beer, or hitting on her other sorority sisters. I finish, give her ample time to, then sleep or leave. Its not easy being a publicly traded commodity with a high stock value.

Tucker Max and Maddox are your idols aren't they? Lord know, nobody is ever going to confuse me with The Sensitive Guy, but even I think this tips the asshole scale a little.

Maerngau wrote: I can think of a few medical reasons - oral performed on a woman can increase the performer's incidence of throat cancer. Which is a shame

I'm going to have to go ahead and call bullshit on that one.

Smunkeeville wrote:meh.

Saint Clair Island wrote:

Maurepas wrote:

Saint Clair Island wrote:There's no such thing as human nature. There's just individual nature. One can predict how large groups of people behave, but extrapolating conclusions on how "humans in general" behave from those predictions is fallacious.

I would say there is a such thing as human nature, which I would define as things humans do...

But there is nothing "humans" do; there are things a human does, and there are even things a majority of humans do, but there's nothing all humans do. Except breathe, eat and drink, excrete, and sleep, and you can hardly argue that those things make up the human nature to which all those political, philosophical, and religious arguments appeal.

JarVik wrote:

So, that vacine the've been working on for preventing cervical cancer would work here too? So I can have my Pie and eat it too..?

Heinleinites wrote:Tucker Max and Maddox are your idols aren't they? Lord know, nobody is ever going to confuse me with The Sensitive Guy, but even I think this tips the asshole scale a little.

Maerngau wrote:

Maurepas wrote:

Maerngau wrote:
Believe me, I'm disappointed too I'm glad this topic, uh, came up though so more people know about the risks.

Yeah, but I would say that is due to the increase in HPV not to the act itself...Oral sex is just one way it spreads, the act itself doesnt give you cancer, its the avenue of the virus...

just like sneezing doesnt give you a cold, its the virus that spreads from it...That doesnt mean you shouldnt sneeze, however,

Granted - no argument here. The gist remains the same though - going down on a lady is riskier than it used to be.

Maerngau wrote:

Maurepas wrote:

Maerngau wrote:
Believe me, I'm disappointed too I'm glad this topic, uh, came up though so more people know about the risks.

Yeah, but I would say that is due to the increase in HPV not to the act itself...Oral sex is just one way it spreads, the act itself doesnt give you cancer, its the avenue of the virus...

just like sneezing doesnt give you a cold, its the virus that spreads from it...That doesnt mean you shouldnt sneeze, however,

Granted - no argument here. The gist remains the same though - going down on a lady is riskier than it used to be.

Kusatsu wrote:I'm no expert on human nature, oftentimes I pretend no such thing exists because I lack some of the essential components of it (ie: sexual desire).